Reviewed by: Avatares de lo invisible: Espacio y subjetividad en los siglos de oro by Luis F. Avilés Aliza Levenson (bio) and Ana Laguna (bio) Luis F. Avilés. Avatares de lo invisible: Espacio y subjetividad en los siglos de oro. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert, 2017. 228 pp. ISBN: 978-84-16922-04-8. Luis Avilés's title, Avatares de lo invisible, alludes to the wide range of figurative and literal spaces that manifest their weight in the fluid subjectivities (racial, ethnic, and gendered) portrayed by Spanish Golden Age literature. If some loci are unsurprising in this spatial inquiry—the house, the court, the battlefield—the nuanced analysis of how selected texts position their subjects existentially, socially, and politically results in new and refreshing revelations. Avilés illustrates the experiential consequences of these spatial appropriations, demonstrating how both physical spaces and invisible liminalities shape literary characters and topoi in the early modern cultural tradition. The interwoven relationship between self and space is revealed in the idea of "amor distante y de oídas," explored in the first chapter. Avilés reads texts like Ibn Hazm de Córdoba's El Collar de la paloma, Razón de Amor, and Don Quijote, highlighting a spatially mediated concept of love that recalls classical referents like Cicero's De amicitia. In the second chapter, Avilés leaves love behind to focus on the view of the court presented by Antonio Guevara in his Menosprecio de corte y alabanza de aldea (1539). Here, he deconstructs the idea of self-fashioning through a granular exploration of how the court's public and private spaces determine the internal and external selves of courtly subjects, who are painfully aware of the official processes and "invisible" machinations that might approve of, support, or betray them. For Avilés, the weight of this pressured awareness is akin to a yoke, un yugo, that severely limits the subject's freedom of movement. Avilés reads a similar environment in Guevara's idea of aldea: an external space almost as threatening to one's internal self as the court, despite the apparently greater liberties that this rural escape affords. In his third chapter, Avilés complicates the idea of an external and "prescriptive" space of conflict by focusing on the Christian and Moorish frontier of Granada, which he reads as a hybrid space shaped as much by dialogue and exchange as by conflict and warfare. In El Abencerraje, those opposing forces are manifested in the warring antagonists, Abencerraje and Abindarráez, who, despite being formidable opponents, are able to craft—thanks to the erosion of war and the vulnerability of exile—an intimate space conducive to mutual understanding, and even kinship. Contrary to historical reality, and to Covarrubias's view of the borderland as a site of clear division between lands [End Page 206] and political jurisdictions (107), Avilés sees the frontier as a porous, liminal space full of varying possibilities for dialogue and cooperation. The last chapter explores, through Lazarillo de Tormes, a much different space: the domestic environment that signifies both a shelter and a social achievement (un buen puerto). Avilés insists on the shelter dimension, since the domestic space allows the early modern subject a place to hide, to remain invisible from the social pressures or external expectations that surround him. This notion that the subject is an aspiring, autonomous entity shaped in relation to others is supported by critics like Judith Butler and Nietzsche and correlated, on a purely literary level, to the anonymity of the novel. For Avilés, such anonymity is not coincidental, as it provides the author a larger narrative autonomy, and even shelter from social and moral constraints (157). Specialists and students of the Spanish Golden Age will appreciate the wide array of literary sources and theoretical approaches employed in Avilés analysis, which includes—besides Cicero, Butler, and Nietzsche, critics like Foucault and Claudio Guillén. Through this eclectic framework, the author provides an intriguing view of early modern subjectivity in constant dialogue with its surrounding spatial demarcation. Rather than presenting a world turned into a stage, Avilés uncovers the disparate worlds of separate stages that determine...