The purpose of research — the comparative analysis of methods of an osteosynthesis, time of carrying out at patients with plural unilateral shaft fracture of the hip and leg associated with the trauma of the stomach and retro peritoneum. Methods. With 2006 on 2012 the author 93 patients with plural unilateral shaft fracture bones of the hip and leg associated with the trauma of the stomach and retro peritoneum were observed. Men — 79 (84,9%), women — 14 (15,1%). 76,3% of victims were able-bodied age (21–60 years). A principal cause of a trauma at 88 (94,6%) victims — road and transport incidents. Right-hand damage is marked at 51 (54,8%) victims, left-hand — at 42 (45,2%). The closed crises it is marked at 32 (34,4%) victims, crisis of a hip at 11 (11,8%), bones of a shin 21 (22,6%). Open crises it is marked at 61 (65,6%), from them a femur — at 19 (31,2%) victims, bones of a leg — at 42 (68,8%), were classified on scale Gustilo R. B., Anderson J. T. (1976). 36 patients were treated by a conservative method, 57 the operative osteosynthesis is made. Results. 6 patients it is made relaporotomy, at 4 patients because of early loading — a floor of a DCP plate on a hip which were it are removed, made reosteosynthesis by intramedullar nail and the frame apparatus, pin an osteomyelitis — 8 (5 hip, 3 leg), the delayed union of bones of a leg — 9, mixed contracture a knee joint — 12 (7 — operative, 5 — non-operative) patients. The remote results are appreciated on scale Jonner R., Wruhs O. (1983). At patients treated a skeletal extension method: excellent — 19, good — 9, satisfactory — 8 (an average estimation — 4,3). An operative osteosynthesis: excellent — 31, good — 7, satisfactory — 11, unsatisfactory — 8 (an average estimation — 4,1). Conclusions. Patients with plural unilateral shaft fracture bones of the of the bottom finitenesses, associated with the trauma of the stomach and retro peritoneum should be observed and treated in versatile hospitals or branches associated traumas, with the stipulated established posts. Where alongside with antishock treatment and surgical interventions, under vital indications, it is necessary to impose skeletal extension which is one of factors of antishock treatment and also an effective independent method of conservative treatment, and serves, necessarily, as preparation of the patient for the further operative osteosynthesis. From methods of an operative osteosynthesis a choice for metallic construction, allowing to receive a steady and stable osteosynthesis, early activity and development of movements in both segments from victims.
Read full abstract