Monolithic 3D-IC is one of the solutions to relieve Moore’s law with vertically integrating circuits for sub-1nm technology nodes. Therefore, thin-film transistors (TFTs) play an important role in this trend because of their low fabrication temperature to realize back-end circuits. On the other hand, 3D integrating filter, duplexer, switch, and so on is necessary as antennas array requirements increase in 5G or beyond. Consequently, it is foreseeable to adopt TFTs to implement radio frequency (RF) devices. Fig. 1 shows the schematic ideal 3D SoC for sub-1nm technology. Our previous research tried to demonstrate high-frequency back-end devices based on the gate-all-around stacked nanosheet low-temperature polycrystalline silicon channel (GAA NS LTPS). Fig.2 shows the current-voltage transfer characteristics of different width designs of LTPS and α-IGZO devices. The only way to enhance GAA NS LTPS RF devices with the same process is by increasing channels. However, it leads to a larger footprint, and the frequency doesn’t boost with increasing channels in proportion because of the capacitance between the multiple channels. In the meantime, the LTPS gate controllability becomes poor, and threshold voltage shifts significantly when the drive current is improved by widening channel width. Consequently, a-IGZO is adopted as the channel material of RF devices to solve the problem mentioned above. The a-IGZO film is back-end compatible and has transparency and high uniformity. The most important is that the gate controllability decay phenomenon is negligible no matter what the channel width is, which is helpful for different width designs. In contrast, IGZO devices can keep their threshold voltage and have ultra-low leakage current due to a large bandgap. According to the system on panel (SoP) trend, we attempt to integrate RFIC with the peripheral circuit on a substrate. Therefore, a-IGZO is also introduced as a pull-down transistor in a CMOS for power reduction and process simplicity. To further minimize the footprint, the a-IGZO devices are nanoscale and stacked on the p-type LTPS as the defined heterogeneous CFET (HCFET), which is demonstrated in the previous study [1]. In this talk, we will discuss HCFET architecture in detail. We compared junctionless mode (JL) and inversion mode (IM) for bottom p-type LTPS in HCFET. In our results, IM is better than JL as the junction structure for bottom PMOS because the requirement of the bottom channel in a HCFET is thin and width flexible for design. In addition, a trench gate of the bottom device plays an important role in HCFET. The trench tri-gate structure can avoid gate dielectric damage by plasma in the etching process, keep the top IGZO layer continuously and enhance performance compared to the general tri-gate structure. On the other hand, the gate of top n-type IGZO can be bottom gate only or dual gate for different requirements. Finally, HCFET can significantly reduce the distance between IGZO and p-type LTPS channels to save power and lower latency in the circuit.[1] S. -W. Chang et al., "First Demonstration of Heterogeneous IGZO/Si CFET Monolithic 3-D Integration With Dual Work Function Gate for Ultralow-Power SRAM and RF Applications," in IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2101-2107, April 2022, doi: 10.1109/TED.2021.3138947. Figure 1