In cyclosporine-based protocols, everolimus is more effective than azathioprine to reduce acute rejection. Ketoconazole may reduce cyclosporine and everolimus requirements. We compared kidney transplant patients treated with everolimus or azathioprine in a ketoconazole- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen. This open-label, prospective trial of low immunologic risk patients. Included one group ( n = 11) who received everolimus (target blood level, 3–8 ng/mL) and the other ( n = 11) azathioprine (2.0–2.5 mg/kg/d). Both received steroids, ketoconazole, and cyclosporine with C 0 targets (ng/mL) in the everolimus group of 200–250, 100–125, and 50–65 for months 1 and 2 and thereafter and in the azathioprine group of 250–300 in month 1, 200–250 in month 2, 180–200 until month 6, and 100–125 thereafter. Their baseline characteristics were similar. Two biopsy-proven acute rejections occurred in each group. Three-year graft and patient survival in both groups was 100%. Creatinine clearances at months 6, 12, 24, and 36 were 63.7 ± 25.4, 58.9 ± 24.9, 56.0 ± 22.9, and 57.0 ± 27.6 in the everolimus group versus 72.6 ± 20, 68.6 ± 21.3, 71.4 ± 23.2, and 68.4 ± 19.2 in the azathioprine group (NS for every comparison). Major complications were rare and similar in both groups. Five patients in the everolimus group received simvastatin versus 4 in the azathioprine cohort ( P = .53). The average cyclosporine doses to achieve targets were 0.8–1.2 mg/kg in the everolimus group and 1.6–2.2 mg/kg in the azathioprine group. The average everolimus dose after month 2 was 0.75–0.9 mg/d. We concluded that with cyclosporine, ketoconazole, and steroids, everolimus was as effective and safe as azathioprine. Cyclosporine reduction with everolimus did not influence graft survival or function at 3 years.
Read full abstract