In this note, we will disprove the following conjecture raised by Exel–Loring: Let A be a C∗-algebra with trace τ and let det : U∞ → R/τ∗(K0(A)) be a determinant associated to τ . If φt : C(S3)→ A (0 ≤ t ≤ 1) is a continuous family of homomorphisms and b ∈ C(S3)⊗M2 is the canonical matrix valued function on S3 which represents the Bott element in K1(C(S)), then det(φ0(b)) = det(φ1(b)). It should be noticed that the conjecture has been proved by Exel–Loring for the case that φt is a smooth family of homomorphisms. Let bn, or simply b, denote the element of K∗(C(S)) (n ≥ 1) which has the Chern character equal to the fundamental class (i.e., the canonical generator of H(S)). We call b the Bott element. In [ExL], Exel–Loring tried to extend the concept of cohomology of topological spaces (commutative C∗-algebras) to general C∗-algebras and define a filtration of K∗(A) of any C∗-algebra A as the following: Definition 1. Let A be a unital C∗-algebra. The spherical filtration F∗K∗(A) of K∗(A) is defined by F0K0(A) = K0(A) , F1K1(A) = K1(A) , FnKn(A) = {x ∈ Kn(A); x = φ∗(b) for some φ ∈ Hom(C(S),Mk ⊗A)} . Exel-Loring proved that the cohomology Hn(X)⊗Q with rational coefficient of finite CW complex X can be recovered from the filtration of K∗(C(X)) by Hn(X)⊗Q = (FnK∗(C(X))) ⊗Q (Fn+2K∗(C(X))) ⊗Q . Also, they defined Hn(A) = FnK∗(A) Fn+2K∗(A) . It is easy to see that, for any C∗-algebra A, F2K∗(A) ⊂ ⋂ τ∈TA Ker τ∗, Received by the editors January 22, 1996 and, in revised form, March 18, 1996. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 46L80, 46M20, 19K56. c ©1997 American Mathematical Society
Read full abstract