Current Androgen Deprivation Therapy Research Articles

The risk of fragility fractures in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is known to increase long-term fracture risk in men with prostate cancer (PCa), although the risk of fragility fractures remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the risk of fragility and malignancy-related fractures in men with PCa treated with ADT. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of men with PCa. Follow-up time was divided into 30-day intervals and exposure (current, past, or no-ADT use). Current ADT use was stratified by duration of ADT use (≤ 182days, 183-730days, and > 730days). Cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of fractures. We included 471 patients (mean age 70.5 (± 8.3) years). The mean follow-up time was 5.0 (± 1.7) years in patients who never started ADT, 3.4 (± 2.3) years and 4.1 (± 2.0) years in patients who started ADT at baseline and during follow-up, respectively. In total, 60 patients had a fracture, 48 (80%) fragility, and 12 (20%) malignancy-related fractures. Current ADT use was associated with a higher risk of all fractures (HR 5.10, 95% CI 2.34-11.13) and fragility fractures (HR 3.61, 95% CI 1.57-8.30). The association with malignancy-related fractures could not be studied due to no events during no-ADT use. There was an increased risk of all fractures with longer duration of ADT use. Current ADT use was associated with a higher risk of fragility fractures than no-ADT use. A higher fracture risk was observed within the first six months of ADT use and persisted for longer durations.

Imaging and therapy targeting PSMA receptors for enhanced vision and precise treatment

SummaryIn Europe, it is estimated that more than 65,000 men die each year from the consequences of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Currently, approximately 3.2 million European men are living with PCa. While the majority of PCa patients have favorable outcomes, the 5‑year relative survival rate for those with metastatic PCa is only 32%. Recent advances in the diagnosis of PCa have been boosted by the introduction of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), which might identify patients with the most aggressive form of the disease. Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) targeting PSMA receptors (PSMA-PET) has utterly revolutionized the diagnosis and staging of PCa; however, its application is still under debate. On the one hand, there has been little progress in recent years in surpassing the limitations of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the backbone of metastatic PCa treatment. Adding additional systemic therapy became standard in the last few decades. Current ADT is only transiently effective, and patients eventually progress during ADT treatment, a condition known as castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). On the other hand, radioligand therapy (RLT) targeting these PSMA receptors, most commonly used in the studies [177Lu]lutetium-PSMA-617, has been available for this cancer stage for nearly a decade and has been recently incorporated into the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines as a robust treatment option for patients with metastatic CRPC.

Oral chemotherapeutic agents in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Multiple oral chemotherapeutic agents for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) have been developed for conjugated use with conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report significant benefits in mHSPC patients. Therefore, we compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) benefits among considerable mHSPC oral chemotherapeutic agents. We investigated mHSPC treatment efficacy through a systematic RCT-trial literature review (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus). Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed bias risk in duplicate. We identified 18 RCTs (n=13,509). Concerning OS, ADT+abiraterone, ADT+abiraterone+docetaxel, ADT+apalutamide, ADT+bicalutamide, ADT+darolutamide+docetaxel, ADT+enzalutamide, ADT+orteronel, and ADT+rezvilutamide were more effective than the standard of care (SOC). Comparing PFS, most treatments were more effective than SOC, excluding ADT+bicalutamide, nilutamide, flutamide, ADT+bicalutamide+palbociclib, and ADT+nilutamide. ADT+docetaxel with androgen receptor targeted agent (ARTA) triplet therapy was not among the top three treatments determined through ranking analysis. Novel oral chemotherapeutic agent combination therapies must replace current ADT monotherapy and ADT+docetaxel SOC. Even so, ADT+docetaxel with ARTA triplet therapy still is not the best mHSPC treatment and requires further study.

Mapping European Association of Urology Guideline Practice Across Europe: An Audit of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use Before Prostate Cancer Surgery in 6598 Cases in 187 Hospitals Across 31 European Countries

BackgroundEvidence-practice gaps exist in urology. We previously surveyed European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for strong recommendations underpinned by high-certainty evidence that impact patient experience for which practice variations were suspected. The recommendation “Do not offer neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before surgery for patients with prostate cancer” was prioritised for further investigation. ADT before surgery is neither clinically effective nor cost effective and has serious side effects. The first step in improving implementation problems is to understand their extent. A clear picture of practice regarding ADT before surgery across Europe is not available. ObjectiveTo assess current ADT use before prostate cancer surgery in Europe. Design, setting, and participantsThis was an observational cross-sectional study. We retrospectively audited recent ADT practices in a multicentre international setting. We used nonprobability purposive sampling, aiming for breadth in terms of low- versus high-volume, academic, versus community and public versus private centres. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOur primary outcome was adherence to the ADT recommendation. Descriptive statistics and a multilevel model were used to investigate differences between countries across different factors (volume, centre type, and funding type). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with low, intermediate, and high risk, and for those with locally advanced prostate cancer. We also collected reasons for nonadherence. Results and limitationsWe included 6598 patients with prostate cancer from 187 hospitals in 31 countries from January 1, 2017 to May 1, 2020. Overall, nonadherence was 2%, (range 0–32%). Most of the variability was found in the high-risk subgroup, for which nonadherence was 4% (range 0–43%). Reasons for nonadherence included attempts to improve oncological outcomes or preoperative tumour parameters; attempts to control the cancer because of long waiting lists; and patient preference (changing one’s mind from radiotherapy to surgery after neoadjuvant ADT had commenced or feeling that the side effects were intolerable). Although we purposively sampled for variety within countries (public/private, academic/community, high/low-volume), a selection bias toward centres with awareness of guidelines is possible, so adherence rates may be overestimated. ConclusionsEAU guidelines recommend against ADT use before prostate cancer surgery, yet some guideline-discordant ADT use remains at the cost of patient experience and an additional payer and provider burden. Strategies towards discontinuation of inappropriate preoperative ADT use should be pursued. Patient summaryAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) is sometimes used in men with prostate cancer who will not benefit from it. ADT causes side effects such as weight gain and emotional changes and increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and osteoporosis. Guidelines strongly recommend that men opting for surgery should not receive ADT, but it is unclear how well the guidance is followed. We asked urologists across Europe how patients in their institutions were treated over the past few years. Most do not use ADT before surgery, but this still happens in some places. More research is needed to help doctors to stop using ADT in patients who will not benefit from it.

Immunotherapy in treatment of metastatic prostate cancer: An approach to circumvent immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.

Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States and the fifth worldwide. Most prostate cancer arises as an androgen-dependent tumor but eventually progresses into castration-resistance prostate cancer, incurable by the current androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy. The development of immunotherapy in cancer treatment has brought an exciting era of antiprostate cancer therapy through antitumor immune responses. Prostate cancer is recognized as a poorly immunogenic tissue with immunological ignorance showing low levels of antigen-presenting process and cytotoxic T-cell activation, high levels of immune checkpoint molecules and immunosuppressive cytokines/chemokines, and recruitment of immunosuppressive cells. Immunotherapies for prostate cancer have been developed to activate the innate and adaptive immune responses, such as vaccines and adoptive CAR-T cells, or to inhibit immunosuppressive molecules, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or antibodies. The U.S Food and Drug Administration has approved Sipuleucel-T for the treatment of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab for the treatment of all solid tumors, including prostate cancer, with impaired mismatch repair genes/microsatellite instability; however, the current clinical outcomes still need to be improved. As various immunosuppressive mechanisms coexist and cross-interact within the tumor microenvironment, different immunotherapy approaches may have to be combined and selected in a highly personalized way. It is hoped that this rapidly evolving field of immunotherapy will achieve successful treatment for mCRPC and will be applied to a wider range of prostate cancer patients.

Characterization of FGFR signaling in prostate cancer stem cells and inhibition via TKI treatment.

Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains uncurable and novel therapies are needed to better treat patients. Aberrant Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) signaling has been implicated in advanced prostate cancer (PCa), and FGFR1 is suggested to be a promising therapeutic target along with current androgen deprivation therapy. We established a novel in vitro 3D culture system to study endogenous FGFR signaling in a rare subpopulation of prostate cancer stem cells (CSCs) in the cell lines PC3, DU145, LNCaP, and the induced pluripotent iPS87 cell line. 3D-propagation of PCa cells generated spheroids with increased stemness markers ALDH7A1 and OCT4, while inhibition of FGFR signaling by BGJ398 or Dovitinib decreased cell survival and proliferation of 3D spheroids. The 3D spheroids exhibited altered expression of EMT markers associated with metastasis such as E-cadherin, vimentin and Snail, compared to 2D monolayer cells. TKI treatment did not result in significant changes of EMT markers, however, specific inhibition of FGFR signaling by BGJ398 showed more favorable molecular-level changes than treatment with the multi-RTK inhibitor Dovitinib. This study provides evidence for the first time that FGFR1 plays an essential role in the proliferation of PCa CSCs at a molecular and cellular level, and suggests that TKI targeting of FGFR signaling may be a promising strategy for AR-independent CRPC.

Performance of FRAX in Men With Prostate Cancer: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.

The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) was created to predict major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and hip fractures in the general population. Whether FRAX accurately predicts fractures in men with prostate cancer is unknown. Our objective was to assess the performance of FRAX for predicting incident fractures in men with prostate cancer. Men from the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Registry (1996-2018) with prostate cancer diagnoses in the 3 years prior to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were identified. FRAX scores with and without BMD were calculated. From population-based healthcare data we identified incident MOF, hip fracture, any osteoporotic fracture and death from the date of BMD testing to March 31, 2018. Cox regression was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) per standard deviation increase in FRAX score. Observed 10-year probability (estimated with competing risk of mortality) was compared with 10-year FRAX-predicted fracture probability to assess calibration. The study population included 684 men with prostate cancer (mean age 74.6 years) and 8608 men without prostate cancer (mean age 65.5 years). FRAX stratified risk for MOF (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.48-2.45 with BMD; HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.43-2.69 without BMD) and hip fracture (HR 3.37, 95% CI 1.90-6.01 with BMD; HR 4.58, 95% CI 2.17-9.67 without BMD) in men with prostate cancer. There was no effect modification observed with prostate cancer status or current androgen deprivation therapy. Observed 10-year fracture probability in men with prostate cancer showed good agreement with FRAX with and without BMD included in the calculation (observed/predicted calibration ratios MOF 0.97, hip 1.00 with BMD; MOF 0.92, hip 0.93 with BMD). In conclusion, FRAX reliably predicts incident fractures in men with prostate cancer. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

The Prospect of Identifying Resistance Mechanisms for Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Circulating Tumor Cells: Is Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition a Key Player?

Prostate cancer (PCa) is initially driven by excessive androgen receptor (AR) signaling with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) being a major therapeutic approach to its treatment. However, the development of drug resistance is a significant limitation on the effectiveness of both first-line and more recently developed second-line ADTs. There is a need then to study AR signaling within the context of other oncogenic signaling pathways that likely mediate this resistance. This review focuses on interactions between AR signaling, the well-known phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/AKT pathway, and an emerging mediator of these pathways, the Hippo/YAP1 axis in metastatic castrate-resistant PCa, and their involvement in the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a feature of disease progression and ADT resistance. Analysis of these pathways in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may provide an opportunity to evaluate their utility as biomarkers and address their importance in the development of resistance to current ADT with potential to guide future therapies.

Targeting the signalling pathways regulated by deubiquitinases for prostate cancer therapeutics.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer diagnosed and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in men worldwide. The current androgen deprivation therapy for PCa cannot fully cure this disease. Moreover, androgen receptor gene amplification and mutation are associated with PCa to develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This review focuses on the deubiquitinases (DUBs) involved in PCa development and progression. For PCa development and progression, several cellular pathways are regulated by specific DUBs which are also highlighted in here. The ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs), a family member of DUBs mostly involved in the regulation of cellular pathways for PCa development, and the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases (UCHs), another family member of DUBs, are responsible for PCa metastasis. Small molecular inhibitors against DUBs can inhibit or reduce the level of specific DUBs through the regulation of cellular pathway to treat this disease. Some small molecular inhibitors are already identified against some of the DUBs, but very few of them are clinically proved in PCa. So, to find out other DUBs involving in the regulation of PCa-related pathways and to develop more effective small molecule inhibitors with greater potency would be a great idea to target PCa cells for future therapeutics and drug development with or without the combination of other anticancer drugs. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY: This review is targeting DUB proteins which are responsible for PCa induction, proliferation, and metastasis by highlighting their signalling pathway so that the readers can get information about other mechanisms for PCa besides androgen receptor pathway and helps to find other oncogenic DUBs involving in these signalling pathways. This review also hopes to find other oncogenic DUBs involving in PCa-related signalling pathways or to find the DUBs that can regulate multiple oncogenic signalling pathways which might be a good target for PCa therapeutics. In addition, there are some small molecule inhibitors that can inhibit the oncogenic DUBs and thus able to control the oncogenic pathways which would be a novel strategy to treat CRPC by using DUB inhibitor combined with or without other anticancer drugs.

Patients with prostate cancer and androgen deprivation therapy have increased risk of fractures\u2014a study from the fractures and fall injuries in the elderly cohort (FRAILCO)

SummaryOsteoporosis is a common complication of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In this large Swedish cohort study consisting of a total of nearly 180,000 older men, we found that those with prostate cancer and ADT have a significantly increased risk of future osteoporotic fractures.IntroductionAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with prostate cancer is associated to increased risk of fractures. In this study, we investigated the relationship between ADT in patients with prostate cancer and the risk of incident fractures and non-skeletal fall injuries both compared to those without ADT and compared to patients without prostate cancer.MethodsWe included 179,744 men (79.1 ± 7.9 years (mean ± SD)) from the Swedish registry to which national directories were linked in order to study associations regarding fractures, fall injuries, morbidity, mortality and medications. We identified 159,662 men without prostate cancer, 6954 with prostate cancer and current ADT and 13,128 men with prostate cancer without ADT. During a follow-up of approximately 270,300 patient-years, we identified 10,916 incident fractures including 4860 hip fractures.ResultsIn multivariable Cox regression analyses and compared to men without prostate cancer, those with prostate cancer and ADT had increased risk of any fracture (HR 95% CI 1.40 (1.28–1.53)), hip fracture (1.38 (1.20–1.58)) and MOF (1.44 (1.28–1.61)) but not of non-skeletal fall injury (1.01 (0.90–1.13)). Patients with prostate cancer without ADT did not have increased risk of any fracture (0.97 (0.90–1.05)), hip fracture (0.95 (0.84–1.07)), MOF (1.01 (0.92–1.12)) and had decreased risk of non-skeletal fall injury (0.84 (0.77–0.92)).ConclusionsPatients with prostate cancer and ADT is a fragile patient group with substantially increased risk of osteoporotic fractures both compared to patients without prostate cancer and compared to those with prostate cancer without ADT. We believe that this must be taken in consideration in all patients with prostate cancer already at the initiation of ADT.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy and the Risk of Anemia in Men with Prostate Cancer.

The use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer may be associated with an increased risk of anemia, but the evidence remains limited. This study aimed to determine if androgen deprivation is associated with increased risk of anemia in patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. This was a population-based cohort study using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics repository. The cohort consisted of 10,364 men newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between 1 April 1998 and 30 September 2015. We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for anemia (hemoglobin <130 g/L) associated with current and past use of androgen deprivation therapy, compared with nonuse. There were 3,651 incident anemia events during 31,574 person-years of follow-up (rate: 11.6/100 person-years). Current androgen deprivation therapy use was associated with a nearly three-fold increased hazard of anemia, compared with nonuse (23.5 vs. 5.9 per 100 person-years, respectively; HR: 2.90, 95% CI: 2.67, 3.16). The HR was elevated in the first 6 months of use (HR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.95, 2.48) and continued to be elevated with longer durations of use. Past androgen deprivation therapy use was associated with a lower estimate (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.43), which returned closer to the null ≥25 months after treatment discontinuation (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.15). The use of androgen deprivation therapy is associated with increased risk of anemia, which reverses upon treatment discontinuation.

Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer and the risk of hospitalisation for community-acquired pneumonia

BackgroundAndrogens have been shown to influence both the immune system and lung tissue, raising the hypothesis that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer may increase the risk of pneumonia....

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPCa) increased the neighboring PCa chemoresistance via altering the PTHrP/p38/Hsp27/androgen receptor (AR)/p21 signals.

Prostatic neuroendocrine cells (NE) are an integral part of prostate cancer (PCa) that are associated with PCa progression. As the current androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with anti-androgens may promote the neuroendocrine PCa (NEPCa) development, and few therapies can effectively suppress NEPCa, understanding the impact of NEPCa on PCa progression may help us to develop better therapies to battle PCa. Here we found NEPCa cells could increase the docetaxel-resistance of their neighboring PCa cells. Mechanism dissection revealed that through secretion of PTHrP, NEPCa cells could alter the p38/MAPK/Hsp27 signals in their neighboring PCa cells that resulted in increased androgen receptor (AR) activity via promoting AR nuclear translocation. The consequences of increased AR function might then increase docetaxel-resistance via increasing p21 expression. In vivo xenograft mice experiments also confirmed NEPCa could increase the docetaxel-resistance of neighboring PCa, and targeting this newly identified PTHrP/p38/Hsp27/AR/p21 signaling pathway with either p38 inhibitor (SB203580) or sh-PTHrP may result in improving/restoring the docetaxel sensitivity to better suppress PCa.

Targeting fatty acid synthase with ASC-J9 suppresses proliferation and invasion of prostate cancer cells.

Fatty acid synthase (FASN) is the key enzyme for the control of fatty acid synthesis that contributes significantly to the prostate cancer (PCa) progression. It was reported that androgens were able to induce FASN expression in PCa, and addition of the anti-androgen Casodex might suppress the androgen-induced FASN expression. However, here we found androgen-deprivation-therapy (ADT) with anti-androgens Bicalutamide (Casodex) or Enzalutamide (MDV3100) had little effect to suppress FASN expression and FASN-mediated cell growth and invasion during the castration resistant stage when the androgen concentration is 1 nM DHT (dihydrotestosterone). In contrast, the newly developed androgen receptor (AR) degradation enhancer ASC-J9® suppressed FASN expression and FASN-mediated cell growth and invasion in various PCa cell lines at 1 nM DHT. Mechanism dissection found ASC-J9® could suppress significantly the FASN expression and FASN-mediated PCa progression via the AR-dependent pathway involving AR→SREBP-1→FASN signaling in AR-positive C4-2 and LNCaP cells and via the AR-independent pathway involving the modulation of PI3K/AKT→SREBP-1→FASN signaling in AR-negative PC-3 and DU145 cells. Together, these results suggest that FASN is one of the important mechanism why the current ADT eventually fails. ASC-J9® might represent a new potential therapeutic approach to suppress FASN-mediated PCa progression via both AR-dependent and AR-independent pathways during the castration resistant stage of PCa. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Vasomotor symptoms in prostate cancer survivors undergoing androgen deprivation therapy

Objective Hot flushes and night sweats (HFNS) are common but under-researched in prostate cancer survivors undergoing androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). We aimed to examine subjective reports and physiological measures of HFNS, and the influence of sociodemographic, clinical and psychological factors on HFNS in men undergoing ADT.Methods Sixty-eight men undergoing ADT for prostate cancer attended an assessment interview, completed questionnaires (assessing HFNS frequency and problem-rating, mood, stress, optimism, somatosensory amplification, HFNS beliefs/behaviors) and wore an ambulatory sternal skin conductance (SSC) monitor for 48 h.Results The sample had a mean age of 69.76 (standard deviation, SD = 8.04) years, were on average 27.24 (SD = 28.53) months since cancer diagnosis and had been on their current ADT regime for 16 months (range 2–74 months). The men reported frequent (weekly mean 51.04, SD = 33.21) and moderately problematic HFNS. Overall, 294 (20%) of the SSC-defined HFNS were concordant with prospective frequency (event marker), while 63% were under-reported and 17% were over-reported, under-reporting being more common than over-reporting. There were no significant predictors of HFNS frequency (subjective or physiological measures), but psychological variables (HFNS beliefs and behaviors (β = 0.56, p < 0.03), anxiety (β = 0.24, p < 0.01) and somatic amplification (β = 0.76, p < 0.04) were the main predictors of problematic HFNS, i.e. troublesome symptoms.Conclusions These results are consistent with those of studies of women during menopause and breast cancer survivors, i.e. subjective and physiological measures appear to identify different HFNS dimensions. Psychological variables (HFNS beliefs and behaviors, anxiety and somatic amplification) can be targeted, using cognitive behavior therapy, for symptom relief.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

BackgroundFew observational studies have investigated the association between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). ObjectiveTo determine whether the use of different types of ADT in patients with PCa is associated with an increased incidence of VTE. Design, setting, and participantsA population-based cohort study was conducted using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics repository. The cohort consisted of men newly diagnosed with PCa between April 1, 1998, and March 31, 2014. Outcome measures and statistical analysisCox proportional hazards models with a time-varying exposure definition were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of patients hospitalized for VTE associated with current and past ADT use compared with nonuse. A secondary analysis was conducted to assess the risk with current use of specific types of ADT. Results and limitationsThe cohort included 21 729 patients, of whom 609 were hospitalized for VTE during follow-up. Current ADT use was associated with an 84% increased risk of VTE (incidence rates: 10.1 vs 4.8 per 1000 person-years; HR: 1.84; 95% CI, 1.50–2.26), whereas there was no association with past use (HR: 1.07; 95% CI, 0.81–1.42). In the secondary analysis, most types of ADT were associated with a high risk of VTE. Residual confounding is possible given the observational nature of the study. ConclusionsThe use of ADT was associated with an overall 84% increased risk of VTE, with the risk elevated for most ADT types. Patient summaryIn this study, we investigated whether androgen deprivation therapy was associated with the risk of blood clots in a cohort of patients with prostate cancer. We observed that the risk was nearly doubled in patients who used ADT compared with those who never used it. This treatment should be reserved for patients for whom the benefits outweigh the risks.

Androgen deprivation therapy use and the risk of venous thromboembolism.

e16131 Background: The use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with prostate cancer, but data remain limited. Methods: A population-based cohort of 21,729 men newly-diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1998 and 2014 was identified using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of hospitalized VTE associated with current and past ADT use, compared with non-use. A secondary analysis was conducted to assess the risk with current use of specific types of ADT. Results: During a mean follow-up of 4.1 years, there were a total of 609 hospitalized incident VTEs. Compared with non-use, current ADT use was associated with a two-fold increased risk of VTE (incidence rates: 10.1 vs 4.8 per 1000 persons per year; HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1...

What is the next generation therapeutic strategy for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in the world. Since androgen receptor (AR) signal plays key roles in the PCa progression, targeting androgens via the current androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the main therapeutic strategy for advanced PCa. However, most patients who receive ADT, including the second generation anti-androgens enzalutamide (also known as MDV3100) may finally develop the castration (or anti-androgen) resistance after 12–24 months treatment. In the manuscript by Asangani et al., the authors demonstrated that targeting the amino-terminal bromodomains of BRD4 could preferentially suppress human castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cell lines. While further studies are required to understand the full impact of their findings, the innovative approach provides a potential novel epigenetic approach for the concerted blockade of oncogenic drivers in CRPC.

Zeb1 promotes androgen independence of prostate cancer via induction of stem cell-like properties.

Current androgen deprivation therapy often leads to androgen independence. However, mechanism of the therapeutic failure is still not well understood. Here, we demonstrate elevated expression of Zeb1 in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells and prostate tumors of castrated PTEN conditional knockout mice. While Zeb1 shRNA resulted in a sensitization of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells, forced Zeb1 expression caused androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells to be more resistant to androgen deprivation. Moreover, such effects appeared to be mediated by induction of pluripotent genes or stem cell-like properties. Collectively, these findings suggest that inhibition of Zeb1 might be a potential therapeutic strategy for treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Patient time and out-of-pocket costs for long-term prostate cancer survivors in Ontario, Canada

Time and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs can represent a substantial burden for cancer patients but have not been described for long-term cancer survivors. We estimated these costs, their predictors, and their relationship to financial income, among a cohort of long-term prostate cancer (PC) survivors. A population-based, community-dwelling, geographically diverse sample of long-term (2-13 years) PC survivors in Ontario, Canada, was identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry and contacted through their referring physicians. We obtained data on demographics, health care resource use, and OOP costs through mailed questionnaires and conducted chart reviews to obtain clinical data. We compared mean annual time and OOP costs (2006 Canadian dollars) across clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and examined the association between costs and four groups of predictors (patient, disease, system, symptom) using two-part regression models. Patients' (N = 585) mean age was 73 years; 77 % were retired, and 42 % reported total annual incomes less than $40,000. Overall, mean time costs were $838/year and mean OOP costs were $200/year. Although generally low, total costs represented approximately 10 % of income for lower income patients. No demographic variables were associated with costs. Radical prostatectomy, younger age, poor urinary function, current androgen deprivation therapy, and recent diagnosis were significantly associated with increased likelihood of incurring any costs, but only urinary function significantly affected total amount. Time and OOP costs are modest for most long-term PC survivors but can represent a substantial burden for lower income patients. Even several years after diagnosis, PC-specific treatments and treatment-related dysfunction are associated with increased costs. Time and out-of-pocket costs are generally manageable for long-term PC survivors but can be a significant burden mainly for lower income patients. The effects of PC-specific, treatment-related dysfunctions on quality of life can also represent sources of expense for patients.