800 Reviews that this is a work of reinterpretation, employing English-related examples which are already familiar to scholars. However, as Saygin wishes to read more nuanced messages into these case studies than did Sammut or Roberto Weiss earlier, so she requires increased precision from her sources. Unfortunately, the evidence is rarely so helpful, and in some cases it is downright awkward. To give one example, Saygin's analysis of one set of humanists' contacts with Humfrey is based on the assertion that those contacts were confined to 1437 (Chapter 13, especially p. 160). However, in the case of one of those humanists, Antonio Pacini, the evidence for his link with Humfrey is a presentation manuscript (Oxford, Magdalen College, MS 37(A)) that cannot date from earlier than mid-1439. Such matters of detail do not, of course, upset her theoretical framework; they are, however, all the more problematic in her firstsection, on Humfrey himself. In Saygin's interpretation, Humfrey's career provides the archetype for the sort of 'integrative approach' she advocates: his cultural and political activities are said to have existed in 'a dialectic relationship' (p. 17) in which the Duke consciously linked the patronage of particular texts with specific events. Yet this is often, at best, case not proven: a work like The Serpent of Division is so difficultto place in a particular context that any interpretation will be hedged around by 'ifs' (pp. 41-45). All the same, some of her speculations are intriguing, like the suggestion that Humfrey may have invited Leonardo Bruni to come to England as a royal tutor (pp. 66-67). Leaving such details aside, there are larger issues at stake. Crucially significant is the question of Humfrey's own involvement in the processes both of cultural patronage and of political presentation. Whether or not Humfrey himself was 'a discerning connoisseur ' (p. 136) is not of the firstimportance; more critical is whether Humfrey, working as the fulcrum of a court, was able to make individual decisions or whether they were, rather, corporate activities. Saygin's thesis assumes the former,but if (as I suspect) they were the latter,this has significance not just forher reading of Humfrey's career but also for her analysis of patronage: with whom were the middlemen brokering? Were they in a power relationship or was it a matter of back-scratching amicitia? Dr Saygin has commendably complicated the models we use?but perhaps she has not made them complex enough. Corpus Christi College, Oxford David Rundle Le cinquecentinedella Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana di Firenze. Ed. by Sara Centi. (Ministero per i Beni e le Attivita Culturali. Indici e Cataloghi, nuova serie, XIV) Rome: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato. 2002. 2 vols. xxxvi + 733 pp.; 41 illus. ?200. ISBN 88-240-3521-3. The Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, housed in the precincts of the church of San Lorenzo and approached by a staircase designed by Michelangelo, was originally the family library of the Medici, but is best known to classical scholars and students of Renaissance culture as containing most of what remains of the historic collection of Latin and Greek manuscripts put together in Florence in the firsthalf of the fifteenth century by Niccolo Niccoli, and presented to Cosimo de' Medici, who placed the books in the public library which he had instituted in the friary of San Marco. In the sixteenth century most of the treasures of this collection were transferred by the Medici dukes to their own library. Subsequent donations and purchases have added to the importance of the manuscript collection, both forclassical and for ltalian stud? ies. However, its printed collection is largely a product of the last two centuries, as in 1783 most of the printed books then in its possession were transferred to another Florentine library as part ofa process of rationalization, and are now in the Biblioteca MLR, 99.3, 2004 801 Nazionale Centrale. Its present small but distinguished printed collection has two main components: the library of firsteditions of classical authors presented to the Laurenziana in 1818 by Count Angelo Maria d'Elci and, by an ironic twist of fortune, those printed books still left in the library of San Marco, acquired...