BackgroundWith the advent of 3D volume rendered CT scans, more information is potentially available to aid the surgeon in complex calcaneal fractures. The primary aim was to determine if there is a difference in inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of 3D CT reconstructions compared to 2D CTs of calcaneus fractures based on classification, identification of specific fracture characteristics and proposed treatment. It is hypothesized that the correlation will be greater between experienced surgeons and trainees when using 3D CT. As a secondary aim, the authors wished to investigate the surgeons’ satisfaction with 3D CT. Patients and methodsThere were six raters, split into 2 groups: high and low surgical experience. Both 2D and 3D scans (10 patients) were reviewed by each rater by filling out a validated questionnaire. This sitting was over a period of six months and all scans were sent separately and randomly by our research coordinator. This process was repeated after a four-week break. ResultsThe overall evaluation and satisfaction of CT scans of calcaneal fractures was improved by the additional use of volume rendered 3D images. Inexperienced surgeons benefited more than experienced surgeons in terms of reliabilities with fracture configuration. 3D CTs were more likely to change the surgeons’ operative strategy. The consistency of deciding on the fracture classification and satisfaction was more uniform between all the raters when 3D CT was used. ConclusionInter-observer and intra-observer reliability of 3D CT reconstructions compared to 2D CTs of calcaneus fractures was greater based on classification, identification of specific fracture characteristics and proposed treatment. Inexperienced surgeons were more consistent when interpreting the scans using 3D CTs (improved inter-observer reliability) and were always more satisfied using the 3D CTs. As there is no extra cost or radiation exposure, we propose that 3D CTs may be valuable with preoperative teaching and planning.