Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Research Articles

Intramedullary Fibular Strut Allograft and a Small Fragment Nonlocking T-plate for Periprosthetic Lateral Femoral Condyle Fracture: A Case Report

Intramedullary Fibular Strut Allograft and a Small Fragment Nonlocking T-plate for Periprosthetic Lateral Femoral Condyle Fracture: A Case Report

Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review.

Posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee is a popular implant choice. At present, there is no consensus on whether sacrifice or retention of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) offers superior outcomes. This review explores the current literature available on CR total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PubMed was searched by keyword to find relevant articles for inclusion. Additional sources came from article references and joint registry reports. CR design knees have distinct kinematic gait patterns from posterior-stabilizing (PS) knees and exhibit paradoxical anterior femoral movement with less femoral rollback. While CR implants offer less flexion than PS designs, the difference is not clinically detectable as clinical scores are similar in the short and long term. CR implants have better long-term survival compared to PS knees, likely due to lower risk of aseptic loosening. CR total knee arthroplasties also have shorter operating times and lower risk of peri-prosthetic fractures. Because the CR implant is unconstrained, there may be an increased risk of instability compared to PS designs, but the literature is mixed. Overall, the current literature supports the continued use of CR TKAs due to their lower risk of complications, durability, and demonstrated equivalence in function to posterior-substituting models.

Better Flexion but Unaffected Satisfaction After Treatment With Posterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty – 2-year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Trial

BackgroundBoth the cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) implant systems are commonplace in modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) practice. However, there is controversy regarding functional outcomes and survivorship. The aim of the underlying study was to evaluate differences between CR and PS TKA regarding knee function, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as well as complication rates. Methods140 patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for an unconstrained TKA were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. Patients received either a CR or PS implant. Range of motion and PROMs (Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score, European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level, University of California Los Angeles Activity scale and subjective satisfaction) were assessed prior to, 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery. ResultsWe found minor differences between treatment groups regarding demographic factors. Within the PS group duration of surgery was longer (mean PS 81.4 min vs CR 76.0 min, P = .006). We observed better flexion (median PS 120.0° vs CR 115°, P = .017) and an overall better range of motion (median PS 120.0° vs CR 115.0°, P = .008) for the PS group. PROMs did not differ between groups. At 2-year follow-up there were no revisions in either cohort. Five patients needed reoperations. Three patients needed manipulation under anesthesia, 2 in the CR and one in the PS group. ConclusionWhile PS TKA achieved a better flexion capability, PROMs were similar in CR and PS TKA. The CR implant design continues to be a reliable option for patients with an intact posterior cruciate ligament.

Increase in the Posterior Tibial Slope Provides Better Joint Awareness and Patient Satisfaction in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The effect of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) on clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to investigate (1) the effect of alteration of the PTS on clinical outcomes, including patient satisfaction and joint awareness, and (2) the relationship between the patient-reported outcomes, the PTS, and compartment loading. Based on the alteration of the PTS after CR-TKA, 39 and 16 patients were stratified into increased and decreased PTS groups, respectively. Clinical evaluation was performed by the Knee Society Score (KSS) 2011 and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Compartment loading was intraoperatively assessed. KSS 2011 (symptoms, satisfaction, and total score) was significantly higher (p = 0.018, 0.023, and 0.040, respectively), and FJS ("climbing stairs?") was significantly lower (p = 0.025) in the increased PTS group compared with the decreased PTS group. The decrease in both medial and lateral compartment loading of Δ45°, Δ90°, and ΔFull was significantly greater in the increased PTS group than in the decreased PTS group (p< 0.01 for both comparisons). Medial compartment loading of Δ45°, Δ90°, and ΔFull significantly correlated with KSS 2011 for "symptom" (r = - 0.4042, -0.4164, and -0.4010, respectively; p = 0.0267, 0.0246, and 0.0311, respectively). ΔPTS significantly correlated with medial compartment loading differentials of Δ45°, Δ90°, and ΔFull (r = - 0.3288, -0.3792, and -0.4424, respectively; p = 0.0358, 0.01558, and 0.0043, respectively). Patients with increased PTS showed better symptoms and higher patient satisfaction compared with those with decreased PTS following CR-TKA, possibly due to a greater decrease in compartment loading during knee flexion.Level of evidence:level IV, therapeutic case series.

Cruciate-Retaining Versus Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be performed using cruciate-retaining (CR), cruciate-substituting (CS), or posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty designs. While there have been many studies comparing the outcomes of CR versus PS TKA, the current literature is lacking in systematic reviews and meta-analyses that compare outcomes of CR knees versus CS TKAs. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature comparing CR and CS knees with regard to survivorship, functional, and patient-reported outcomes, range of motion (ROM), biomechanics, and revision rate. PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were used for the literature search, and the Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess the quality of the studies. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria.This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that there are no significant differences in survivorship, ROM, or clinical knee scores between the CR and CS knees. Postoperative complications did not vary greatly between the CR and CS groups. Among the seven studies, three CR designs needed revision for either patellar crepitus, joint stiffness, or aseptic loosening of the tibial component. One CS design needed arthrotomy due to patellar clunk syndrome. CR and CS knees are both reasonable options for primary TKA.

Reverse coronal deformity: use of robotic total knee arthroplasty for identification and correction.

Despite continued advances in techniques and implant designs, a population of patients who are dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains. During robotic-assisted arthroplasty, real-time intraoperative assessment of patient knee alignment is performed. Here, we assess the prevalence of an under-appreciated deformity, reverse coronal deformity (RCD), and the benefits of utilizing robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty to help correct this dynamic deformity. A retrospective study evaluating patients undergoing robotic-assisted cruciate-retaining TKA was performed. Intraoperative measurements were obtained using tibial and femoral arrays to assess coronal plane deformity at full extension and at 90° flexion. RCD was defined as ≥ 2° varus in knee extension that reversed to ≥ 2° valgus in flexion, or vice-versa. Coronal plane deformity was then reassessed after robotic-assisted bony resection and implant placement. Of 204 patients that underwent TKA, 16 patients (7.8%) were found to have RCD, with 14 patients (87.5%) transitioning from varus in extension to valgus in flexion. The average coronal deformity was 7.75°, with a maximum of 12°. These improved to an average coronal change of 0.93° post-TKA. Final medial and lateral gaps were all balanced to within 1° in extension and flexion. Another 34 patients (16.7%) had ≥ 5° change in coronal plane deformity from extension to flexion (average 6.39°), however, did not experience a reversal of their coronal deformity. Outcomes were assessed with KOOS Jr. scores postoperatively. Computer and robotic assistance were utilized to demonstrate the prevalence of RCD. We also demonstrated accurate identification and successfully balancing of RCD utilizing robotic-assisted TKA. An increased awareness of these dynamic deformities could aid surgeons in proper gap balancing even in the absence of navigation and robotic-assisted surgery.

Relationship Between Mechanoreceptors in the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Patient Age or Osteoarthritis Severity.

Mechanoreceptors in the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) can produce proprioception, which is an important reason why patients choose cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The number of mechanoreceptors in the PCL of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) is unknown. To provide a theoretical basis for estimating the number of mechanoreceptors in the PCL by evaluating the relationship between this number and patient age or OA severity. Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. An overall 28 PCLs from patients with knee OA were collected at the time of TKA and grouped according to patient age (group A, 60-69 years [n = 8]; group B, 70-79 years [n = 12]; group C, ≥80 years [n = 8]) and OA based on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (group I, ≤80 [n = 8]; group II, 81-120 [n = 10]; group III, >120 [n = 10]). Hematoxylin and eosin and S-100 immunohistochemical staining were performed on the slices near the tibial attachment of the PCL, and the number of mechanoreceptors in each slice was counted. Multifactor analysis of variance was used to evaluate the relationship between the number of mechanoreceptors and patient age or WOMAC score. The number of mechanoreceptors (mean ± SD) in groups A, B, and C was 24.00 ± 15.19, 30.92 ± 11.41, and 23.38 ± 11.39, respectively, with no significant between-group differences. The number of mechanoreceptors in groups I, II, and III was 43.50 ± 4.99, 25.00 ± 5.27, and 15.20 ± 5.61, with significant differences between groups I and II, groups I and III, and groups II and III (P < .001 for all). In patients with knee OA, age had no significant effect on mechanoreceptor count, but the number of mechanoreceptors in the PCL decreased significantly with higher (worse) WOMAC score. These findings suggest that in patients of any age with high WOMAC scores, there may be little value as it relates to knee proprioception in performing a PCL-retaining TKA.

Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Bearing Designs and the Role of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament.

The role of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery continues to be a source of debate among the adult reconstruction community. In native knee flexion, the PCL is comprised of an anterolateral and posteromedial bundle that work together to limit posterior tibial translation and allow adequate femoral rollback for deep flexion. In the arthritic knee, the PCL can often become dysfunctional and attenuated, which led to the development of posterior stabilized (PS) TKA bearing options. PS TKAs implement a cam-post construct to functionally replace a resected PCL. While PS designs may facilitate balancing knees with significant deformity, they are associated with complications such as postfracture, increased wear, and patellar clunk/crepitus. In recent years, newer designs have been popularized with greater degrees of congruency and incorporation of medial and lateral pivoting to better recreate native knee kinematics. The American Joint Registry has confirmed the recent predilection for ultra-congruent and cruciate-retaining TKA inserts over PS TKAs during the last decade. Studies have failed to identify an overall clinical superiority between the cruciate substituting and sacrificing designs. The literature has also failed to identify clinical consequences from PCL resection with modern, more conforming TKA designs. In this article, we review modern PCL sacrificing designs and discuss the impact of each on the kinematics after TKA. We also will delineate the role of the PCL in modern TKA in the hopes to better understand the recent surge in sacrificing but not substituting knee implants.

The effect of posterior tibial slope on anteroposterior stability in posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundIt has been suggested that the posterior tibial slope (PTS) plays an important role in increasing the anteroposterior stability following total knee arthroplasty. Although the relationship between the PTS and the flexion range has been investigated many times, studies on the relationship between PTS and anterior-posterior stability are limited. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the relationship and effects of PTS on anteroposterior stability in posterior cruciate retainer total knee arthroplasty.Methods154 primary TKAs were identified retrospectively to analyze the any association between PTS and anteroposterior laxity following posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in the overall study populations. Anteroposterior displacement was measured at the final follow-up based on the following two procedures: KT-1000 arthrometer and sagittal drawer radiographic images. In addition, the relationship between PTS and functional scores-ROM was examined.ResultsThere was no correlation between patients’ posterior tibial slope and postoperative VAS (r: -0.060, p:0.544), WOMAC (r:0.037, p:0.709), KSS (r: -0.073, p:0.455). In addition, there was no significant correlation between postoperative knee ROM and postoperative PTS (r:0.159, p:0.106). Moreover, no correlation was found between KT-1000 arthrometer and 20 degrees AP translation with PTS. There was a negative correlation between PTS and 70 degrees AP translation (r: -0.281, p:0.008).ConclusionsThis study aimed to clarify the association between instability and AP laxity in flexion of implanted knees, and to determine what degree of AP laxity results of instability. A fundamental finding of this study was that; the optimum TS angle to increase anterior-posterior stability after total knee arthroplasty is between ≥ 4 to < 6 degrees, we also proved that there is no relationship between stability and patient satisfaction.

Can pain be improved with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament during total knee arthroplasty?

The purpose of the current study was to determine if differences exist between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) implant articulations for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with regards to early post-operative pain. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent primary TKA, with the same TKA implant design, at our institution between January 2018 and July 2021. Patients were stratified based on whether they received a CR or non-constrained PS (PSnC) articulation and propensity score matched in a 1:1 ratio. A sub-analysis matching patient who received a constrained PS implant (PSC) to those undergoing CR TKA and PSnC TKA was also carried out. Opioid dosages were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). 616 patients after CR TKA were matched 1:1 to 616 patients with a PSnC implant. There were no significant differences between demographic variables. There were no statistically significant differences in opioid usage measured by MME on post-operative day (POD) 0 (p = 0.171), POD1 (p = 0.839), POD2 (p = 0.307), or POD3 (p = 0.138); VAS pain scores (p = 0.175); or 90-day readmission rate for pain (p = 0.654). A sub-analysis of CR versus PSC TKA demonstrated no significant differences in opioid usage on POD0 (p = 0.765), POD1 (p = 0.747), POD2 (p = 0.564), POD3 (p = 0.309); VAS pain scores (p = 0.293); and 90-day readmission rate for pain (p > 0.9). Our analysis demonstrated no significant difference in post-operative VAS pain scores and MME usage based on implant. The results suggest that neither the type of articulation or constraint used for primary TKA has a significant impact on immediate post-operative pain and opioid consumption. Retrospective Cohort Study.

Gross Appearances of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Correlate With Its Histological Features but not With In Vivo Function in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background No study has evaluated whether the macroscopic appearance or histological features of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) affect the in vivo PCL function in cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to elucidate the correlation between intraoperative gross appearances of the PCL and clinical parameters, their corresponding histological features, and the in vivo function. Methods The intraoperative gross appearances of the PCLs were evaluated; we also examined their correlations with clinical parameters, corresponding histological features, and the in vivo function in CR-TKA. Results There were significant correlations between intraoperative gross appearances of the PCL and that of the anterior cruciate ligament, the preoperative knee flexion angle, and the intercondylar notch stenosis. There was a significant correlation between the intraoperative gross appearance in the middle part and the corresponding histological features. However, there was no significant correlation between the intraoperative gross appearance or histological features and the PCL tension, amount of rollback, and maximum knee flexion angle. Conclusions The intraoperative gross appearance of the PCL correlated with clinical parameters. Also, there was a significant correlation between the intraoperative gross appearance in the middle part and the corresponding histological features; however, there was no correlation between the intraoperative gross appearance or histological features and the in vivo function.

An investigation into whether changes in the posterior tibial slope affect the outcome of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty by affecting tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics

AimsThe outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are affected by many factors. This study aims to evaluate whether changes in the posterior tibial slope (PTS) affect patients’ outcomes after cruciate-retaining TKA by affecting tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics. It was hypothesized that changes in PTS affect the outcomes of PCR TKA by affecting tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics. MethodsA total of 60 knees (30 patients) that underwent posterior cruciate-retaining TKA (with the same size prosthesis) for medial osteoarthritis were assessed preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Before and after TKA, changes in the PTS, as seen on lateral radiographs, were noted. The knees were placed in groups according to these PTS changes (preoperative value − postoperative value): group 1 >3° change and group 2 ≤3° change. Knee kinematics were observed under mid-flexion weight-bearing conditions and were compared between the two groups using the two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and knee function was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Knee Society Score (KSS). ResultsGroup 2 experienced paradoxical anterior motion of the medial femoral condyle postoperatively, but group 1 did not. A comparison of the results of the TKA between the two groups showed a significant difference in pain using the visual analog scale, and knee function of the KSS and the WOMAC (P < 0.05). The postoperative results were better in group 1 than in group 2. ConclusionsThese results suggest that achieving a greater change in the PTS improves outcomes in patients undergoing posterior cruciate-retaining TKA because it reduces the paradoxical motion of the medial femoral condyle.

Total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe obesity: outcomes of standard keeled tibial components versus stemmed universal base plates

BackgroundPatients with severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2] potentially overload the tibial component after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), risking tibial subsidence. Using a cemented single-radius cruciate-retaining TKA design, this study compared the outcomes of two tibial baseplate geometries in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2: standard keeled (SK) or universal base plate (UBP), which incorporates a stem.MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-centre cohort study with minimum 2 years follow-up of 111 TKA patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2: mean age 62.2 ± 8.0 (44–87) years, mean BMI 44.3 ± 4.6 (40–65.7) kg/m2 and 82 (73.9%) females. Perioperative complications, reoperations, alignment and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS): EQ-5D, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score and satisfaction were collected preoperatively, and at 1 year and final follow-up postoperatively.ResultsMean follow-up was 4.9 years. SK tibial baseplates were performed in 57 and UBP in 54. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics, post-operative alignment, post-operative PROMs, reoperations or revisions between the groups. Three early failures requiring revision occurred: two septic failures in the UBP group and one early tibial loosening in the SK group. Five-year Kaplan–Meier survival for the endpoint mechanical tibial failure was SK 98.1 [94.4–100 95% confidence interval (CI)] and UBP 100% (p = 0.391). Overall varus alignment of the limb (p = 0.005) or the tibial component (p = 0.031) was significantly associated with revision and return to theatre.ConclusionsAt early to mid-term follow-up, no significant differences in outcomes were found between standard and UBP tibial components in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Varus alignment of either tibial component or the limb was associated with revision and return to theatre.

Insertion of a spacer block translates the tibia anteriorly during evaluation of soft tissue balance in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundSoft tissue balance is an important determinant of the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are differences in the joint gap and ligament balance between the osteotomized femoral and tibial surfaces and those after TKA. The aim of this study was to compare the relationship between the femur and tibia at insertion of a spacer block with that after cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. MethodsThirty knees in 30 patients (26 women, 4 men) who underwent primary CR TKA with a navigation system were enrolled. Mean age at surgery was 76.3 (range, 63–87) years. After osteotomy of the femur and tibia, the flexion–extension gap and ligament balance were evaluated using a spacer block. The location of the tibial center in relation to the femoral center in the sagittal plane calculated from navigation data at insertion of an appropriately sized spacer block in knee flexion was compared with that after CR TKA using the paired t-test. ResultsThe mean sagittal location of the tibial center relative to the femoral center in knee flexion was 5.16 (range, −2.4, 16.3) mm at insertion of the spacer block and 6.60 (range, −1.4, 15.1) mm after CR TKA, and this difference was significant (p = 0.016). ConclusionAssessment of soft tissue balance using a spacer block in CR TKA during knee flexion changes the location of the tibia. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for overestimating the postoperative flexion gap in CR TKA when using a spacer block to assess the flexion gap.

Uncemented Tibial Fixation Has Comparable Prognostic Outcomes and Safety Versus Cemented Fixation in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Cemented and uncemented fixation are the primary methods of tibial prosthesis fixation in total knee arthroplasty. However, the optimal fixation method remains controversial. This article explored whether uncemented tibial fixation has better clinical and radiological outcomes, fewer complications, and revision rates compared to cemented tibial fixation. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to September 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and cemented TKA. The outcome assessment consisted of clinical and radiological outcomes, complications (aseptic loosening, infection, and thrombosis), and revision rate. Subgroup analysis was used to explore the effects of different fixation methods on knee scores in younger patients. Nine RCTs were finally analyzed with 686 uncemented knees and 678 cemented knees. The mean follow-up time was 12.6 years. The pooled data revealed significant advantages of uncemented fixations over cemented fixations in terms of the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) (p = 0.01) and the Knee Society Score-Pain (KSS-Pain) (p = 0.02). Cemented fixations showed significant advantages in maximum total point motion (MTPM) (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between uncemented fixation and cemented fixation regarding functional outcomes, range of motion, complications, and revision rates. When comparing among young people (<65 years), the differences in KSKS became statistically insignificant. No significant difference was shown in aseptic loosening and the revision rate among young patients. The current evidence shows better knee score, less pain, comparable complications and revision rates for uncemented tibial prosthesis fixation, compared to cemented, in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

What is the Optimal Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tension to Achieve Patient Satisfaction in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty?

IntroductionAchieving adequate posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tension is important during PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA), but the effect of PCL release on this tension is unpredictable. This study assessed the relationship between postoperative PCL laxity and patient satisfaction at a 2-year follow-up. MethodsThere were 44 varus osteoarthritis knees undergoing CR-TKA included. The PCL tension was adjusted by resizing the femoral component and modifying the posterior tibial slope, without PCL release. Postoperative PCL laxity at 90° of knee flexion was defined as the difference in radiographic anterior-posterior tibial translation with or without an 80-Newton posterior load at the tibial tubercle measured using a load device. Four subgroups were defined according to the PCL laxity: laxity ≤0 mm (n = 5); 0 mm < laxity ≤2 mm (n = 19); 2 mm < laxity ≤4 mm (n = 10); and laxity >4 mm (n = 10). The effect of PCL laxity on the 2-year postoperative 2011 Knee Society Score was determined. ResultsThe femoral component was downsized in 27 of 44 knees, while the posterior tibia slope was increased in 6 of 44 knees, but no PCL was released intraoperatively. The 2011 Knee Society Score subscores improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively, and patients reported “neutral satisfaction” or better after 96% of operations. The mean PCL laxity was 2.3 mm on postoperative stress radiographs, and postoperative satisfaction scores were significantly highest in the subgroup with 2-4 mm laxity. ConclusionCR-TKA was successfully performed without PCL release. Moderate PCL laxity (2-4 mm) achieved excellent postoperative satisfaction.

The flexion–extension gap is predictive of patient-reported outcome measures after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundWe aimed to evaluate the association between the flexion–extension gap difference and patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsThis was a retrospective case–control study of 60 cruciate-retaining single-radius TKAs. Soft tissue balancing was measured using an offset seesaw tensioner and centre-type digital knee balancer under joint distraction forces of 20–50 lbf and 1.5 times body mass index (1.5 BMI). At the last follow up of 2.0–6.5 (mean, 4.5) years postoperatively, patients were asked if they perceived their knee joint as ‘natural’ (26 knees) or ‘artificial’ (34 knees). Age, sex, and the flexion–extension gap were compared between the two groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine cut-off values of variables predictive of a natural joint perception. ResultsNatural joint perception was associated with a greater flexion–extension gap difference under a distraction force of 1.5 BMI (P = 0.016), higher knee function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, P = 0.019), and quality of life (EuroQol 5-Dimension, P = 0.029). A gap difference of 0.95 mm under 1.5 BMI distraction predicted a natural joint perception post-TKA (sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 88.5%). Using a gap threshold of 1.0 mm under a 1.5 BMI distraction force yielded significant between-group differences in postoperative flexion (P = 0.040), satisfaction (P = 0.043), knee joint function (P < 0.001), quality of life (P = 0.032), and posterior femoral condylar offset (P = 0.037) ConclusionA flexion–extension gap difference ≥1.0 mm under a distraction force of 1.5 BMI predicted superior outcomes, including patient satisfaction, after cruciate-retaining TKA. It was suggested that posterior femoral condylar offset could influence this finding.

Difference in implant design affects midflexion rotational laxity in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a computer navigation study

PurposeThis study aimed to compare midflexion rotational laxity between two different design concept models of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: symmetrical surface design of neutral joint line obliquity and asymmetrical surface design of varus joint line obliquity.MethodsSixty-three knees that underwent cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty were evaluated. Manual maximum passive rotational stress without acceleration was applied to the knees under navigation monitoring. Pre-operative and post-operative internal and external rotational angles were measured at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion.ResultsThe post-operative internal rotational laxity was significantly increased compared with pre-operative levels at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° flexion among all subjects (mean 9.7° vs 11.1°, 10.6° vs 11.6°, 11.2° vs 12.9°, and 13.2° vs 14.9°; p = 0.01, 0.04, 0.001, and 0.008, respectively). The post-operative external rotational laxity was significantly decreased compared to pre-operative levels at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° flexion among all subjects (mean 10.8° vs 6.8°, 12.5° vs 9.4°, 12.8° vs 10.0°, and 11.3° vs 9.5°; p < 0.0001, < 0.0001, < 0.0001, and 0.0008, respectively). The post-operative total rotational laxity significantly decreased, compared with pre-operative levels, at 30° and 45° flexion among all subjects (mean 20.4° vs 17.9°, and 23.1° vs 21.1°; p = 0.002 and 0.04, respectively). The post-operative total rotational laxity was significantly smaller in asymmetrically designed total knee arthroplasty than in symmetrically designed total knee arthroplasty at 30°, 45°, and 60° flexion (mean 19.3° vs 15.8°, 22.8° vs 18.7°, and 24.4° vs 20.8°; p = 0.03, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively), whereas no significant difference was observed at 90° flexion.ConclusionCompared to symmetrical surface design, asymmetrical surface design resulted in lower rotational laxity at the midflexion range in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.Level of evidenceIII.

Outcomes of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity.

Varus deformity is common in osteoarthritic knee. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes after cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for severely varus osteoarthritic knees and compare them to those of mildly to moderately deformed osteoarthritic knees. Eight hundred ninety-four subjects were undergone CR TKA, 137 had severe varus deformity (group 1), and 757 had mild-to-moderate deformity (group 2) of the lower limb preoperatively. Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared between two groups clinically and radiographically. Mean follow-up period was 54.7 ± 28.9months. Mean age was 77.8 ± 6.7years in group 1 and 74.5 ± 7.4years in group 2 (p < 0.001). Preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was - 17.7°±2.9° in group 1 and - 6.3° ± 5.1° in group 2 (p < 0.001). Preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 127.7° ± 15.2° in group 1 and 130.8 °± 9.6° in group 2 (p = 0.019). Preoperative Knee Society scores and WOMAC score were not significantly different between two groups. Postoperative HKAA was - 0.4° ± 2.3° in group 1 and 0.6 ° ± 2.0° in group 2 (p < 0.001). Postoperative ROM, Knee Society scores, and WOMAC score were not significantly different between two groups. CR TKA showed results in subjects with severe varus deformities comparable to those without severe varus deformities. Whether the degree of preoperative varus deformity of the lower limb should be considered when deciding to perform CR-type or PS-type TKA requires further discussion. Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Prospective sequential comparison of femoral roll-back between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using an intra-operative sensor

BackgroundImplant design and surgical techniques affect postoperative knee kinematics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to compare femoral roll-back between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA in the same knee by objectively quantifying the contact point kinematics of the tibiofemoral joint using a sensor. MethodsIn the present prospective study, we used an intraoperative sensor to compare medial and lateral roll-back during 0-120° knee flexion in 33 knees that underwent CR and PS TKA. We also examined the relationship between mediolateral balance and the lateral-to-medial roll-back ratio. We defined the contact percentage position as the vertical length to the contact point divided by the anteroposterior length of the tibial plate. ResultsThe roll-back percentage following PS TKA (19.8 ± 5.1%) was significantly higher than that after CR TKA in both the medial (19.8 ± 5.1% versus 7.1 ± 2.5%, P < 0.001) and lateral (26.8% ± 3.8% versus 18.7 ± 3.8%, P < 0.001) compartments. The medial contact pressure at 90° was significantly correlated with the increased lateral-to-medial roll-back ratio in both CR and PS TKA (both P < 0.001). ConclusionPS TKA resulted in a higher percentage of femoral roll-back in the medial and lateral compartments than CR TKA. CR TKA caused a higher lateral-to-medial roll-back ratio compared to PS TKA. To reproduce medial pivot knee motion similar to that of a normal knee, the medial soft tissue needed to be balanced more tightly than the lateral soft tissue during TKA. These findings provide some clinical evidence of TKA design selection and proper mediolateral balancing for successful TKA.