You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Advanced (including Drug Therapy) III1 Apr 2018MP52-09 MULTICENTRIC PROSPECTIVE LOCAL TREATMENT OF METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER (LOMP) TRIAL: INTERIM ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS Sarah Buelens, Filip Poelaert, Bert Dhondt, Elise De Bleser, Caroline Verbaeys, Bernard Rappe, Bart Kimpe, Ignace Billiet, Hendrik Plancke, Karen Fransis, Patrick Willemen, Bart De Troyer, Piet Ost, Karel Decaestecker, and Nicolaas Lumen Sarah BuelensSarah Buelens More articles by this author , Filip PoelaertFilip Poelaert More articles by this author , Bert DhondtBert Dhondt More articles by this author , Elise De BleserElise De Bleser More articles by this author , Caroline VerbaeysCaroline Verbaeys More articles by this author , Bernard RappeBernard Rappe More articles by this author , Bart KimpeBart Kimpe More articles by this author , Ignace BillietIgnace Billiet More articles by this author , Hendrik PlanckeHendrik Plancke More articles by this author , Karen FransisKaren Fransis More articles by this author , Patrick WillemenPatrick Willemen More articles by this author , Bart De TroyerBart De Troyer More articles by this author , Piet OstPiet Ost More articles by this author , Karel DecaesteckerKarel Decaestecker More articles by this author , and Nicolaas LumenNicolaas Lumen More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1660AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The multicentric prospective Local treatment of Metastatic Prostate cancer (LoMP) trial investigates the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) in addition to standard of care (SoC) for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). We aim to evaluate clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. METHODS Since 2014, 72 asymptomatic patients were prospectively included (NTC 02138721). cRP was performed in patients with a resectable tumor, fit to undergo surgery (group A, n&[ident]34). Only SoC was administered to patients who were ineligible or unwilling to undergo cRP (group B, n&[ident]38). Kaplan-Meier method was used for castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC-FS), overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), local event-free survival under androgen deprivation therapy (LE-FS) and skeletal related event-free survival (SRE-FS). Risk factors were identified using univariate Cox regression models. RESULTS Compared to group B, patients in group A were younger (median 66 vs 76 years, p≤0.001), showed a better health status (ECOG≥2 in 0% vs 16%, p&[ident]0.026), lower initial PSA (median 18 vs 166 g/L, p≤0.001) and less high-volume mPC (21% vs 63%, p≤0.001) with a lower number of bone metastases (2 vs 7, p&[ident]0.005). Tumor grade group (WHO≥4 in 88% vs 82%, p&[ident]0.5) and cT-stage (≥cT3-4 in 68% vs 79%, p&[ident]0.3) showed no significant difference in group A and B.Median follow-up was 11 months (IQR 5-21). One year CRPC-FS (91% vs 61%, p&[ident]0.019), OS (100% vs 80%, p&[ident]0.003) and CSS (100% vs 83%, p&[ident]0.009) were significantly better in group A compared to group B. Idem for one year LE-FS (100% vs 74%, p&[ident]0.001) and SRE-FS (100% vs 86%, p&[ident]0.023).Only SoC (group B; p&[ident]0.020 en p&[ident]0.003) and high-volume mPC (p&[ident]0.005 en p&[ident]0.013) were identified as risk factors for shorter CRPC-FS and OS. For OS, higher age (p≤0.001), ECOG (p≤0.001) and initial PSA (p&[ident]0.005) were extra risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed mPC eligible to undergo cRP show more favorable characteristics compared to those receiving only SoC. These patients show significantly better oncological outcomes and moreover less risk of developing both early local and skeletal-related events. To what extent these benefits can be attributed to cRP needs to be further explored. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e698 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Sarah Buelens More articles by this author Filip Poelaert More articles by this author Bert Dhondt More articles by this author Elise De Bleser More articles by this author Caroline Verbaeys More articles by this author Bernard Rappe More articles by this author Bart Kimpe More articles by this author Ignace Billiet More articles by this author Hendrik Plancke More articles by this author Karen Fransis More articles by this author Patrick Willemen More articles by this author Bart De Troyer More articles by this author Piet Ost More articles by this author Karel Decaestecker More articles by this author Nicolaas Lumen More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract