Abstract The call for citizenship education as a compulsory part of curriculum has met with a varied response worldwide. While everyone would espouse ideals of ensuring our young people grow up to be active and fair-minded citizens, why does citizenship education not figure more prominently in our curriculum'? This article discusses past, present, and possible future of citizenship education in New Zealand Curriculum. Introduction The call for citizenship education as a compulsory part of curriculum has met with a varied response worldwide. In United Kingdom it was made a compulsory cross-curricular theme in 2002 (see, for example, Kerr, 2002); in United States (where it is known as civics) it is a curriculum area with a set of national standards (Pederson & Cogan, 20(12); in Australia there is ministerial endorsement of Discovering Democracy (a programme that is federally funded and distributed to all states) and there are active citizenship programmes in most states (O'Brien & Parry, 2002); in Canada there has been renewed interest across provinces (Hebert & Sears, 2001); in New Zealand, it barely rates a mention. This article takes notion of citizenship education and discusses its relationship to current New Zealand curriculum. Why has this concept not taken root? I will argue that although it is not specifically named as such, it does exist in a range of guises. I will also argue that there is huge potential for enhancing and strengthening threads that do exist. This article begins with a general discussion of citizenship and citizenship education. I then examine history of citizenship education in New Zealand curriculum and discuss its current status before concluding with recommendations for strengthening its potential. Citizenship: what is it? If not born in New Zealand or of New Zealand parentage, an applicant for New Zealand citizenship must, under Citizenship Act 1977, have: * completed a period of permanent residency for three years (or two years, if married to a new Zealand citizen); * intention to continue to live in New Zealand; * ability to understand and speak English; * a knowledge of and privileges of New Zealand citizenship; and * been certified to be of good character. (1) So what are these responsibilities and privileges? Yvonne Hebert and Alan Sears (2001), writing for Canadian Education Association, define citizenship as the relationship between individual and state, and among individuals within a (p. 1). Rob Gilbert (1996, p.108), an Australian social studies educator, views citizenship as a contested term. He explains: Some definitions emphasise nation stale as an entity to which people should give allegiance and loyalty. Other definitions emphasise individual rights or a sense of shared loyalty. Others focus on citizen participation in government. Gilbert outlines four major views of citizenship: * as a status implying formal rights and duties; * as an identity and a set of moral and social virtues based on democratic ideal; * as a public practice conducted through legal and political processes; and * as participation in decision making in all aspects of life. When discussing citizenship in New Zealand elsewhere (for example, Mutch, 2005) I have adapted these categories as follows, with second one being separated into two to make a total of five: citizenship as status; citizenship as identity; citizenship as democratic ideal, citizenship as public practice; and citizenship as participation. Citizenship as status relates to legal rights and that a person has as a member of a nation state and of a community within that political entity. Citizenship as identity is broader than purely national identity--it can include religious, political, ethnic, regional, or other affiliations, a notion that Kymlicka (1995) calls multicultural or multiple citizenship. …
Read full abstract