The brand 'AESOP' stands for excellence in planning education in Europe. The 23rd AESOP congress in Liverpool certainly stood loyal to this legacy. However, for those young academics joining the AESOP family this year, the event will be remembered not only by its expected traits, but also for its unanticipated qualities. Across its 18 tracks, the 23rd congress gathered participants from far beyond the European planning schools that AESOP represents. Planning academics came from as far as China, Malaysia, South Africa, Australia, Brazil, USA, Tanzania and New Zealand (just to mention a few). Learning about planning issues from these countries along with European ones was the most unexpected and enriching experience. Considering our cultural diversity, even less expected was the immediate sense of belonging and the almost nonchalant ease in cross-national communication created at the event. Apart from individual presentations, some other congress events facilitating interactive knowledge exchange were of particular value. Meetings of the AESOP working groups, the Young Academics Network events and the PhD Workshop held immediately before the congress in the University of Manchester provided places for such gatherings. They made us realise that no matter how different our backgrounds and local contexts may be, no matter what languages we speak, dealing with similar issues and facing similar challenges gives us a sense of unity. Institutional fragmentation; the breakdown of old and the appearance of new planning networks; the increasing role of market forces in the spatial distribution of development; and complexity and change (Albrechts and Balducci, 2009) were just a few examples among the common issues to emerge in the 'Governance and participation' congress track to which my research led me. However, an increasing wealth of international perspectives on a single planning issue made the question 'how can we learn from each other?' even more significant. When discussing the issue of 'change', Prof. Louis Albrechts emphasised that 'a main challenge for planning is to develop the power to make [location and time specific] concepts travel, and to translate them into an array of practice arenas' (Albrechts, 2009). Across the diverse presentations at the 23rd AESOP Congress, I found a new form of cross-cultural research taking over. This was not intentional comparative research, but a form evolving as a result of freedom to travel, a sense of adventure, of prestige and economic migration: Americans researching Russian planning, Germans investigating participation in India, Yugoslavians studying the housing market in England, Malaysians moving to the UK only to study - Malaysia, Mexicans studying development in China for a Dutch university while living in India. And these were just a few researchers representing a rising generation of young planning academics. The future ability to 'make planning concepts travel' (as freely as we do) may lie in understanding the ways these researchers 'journey' from one culture to another in pursuit of an answer for a single research question; how they use several languages to make sense of 'local knowledge' coming from one neighbourhood; and how they bend theoretical concepts while unintentionally mixing cultures. Examining the influence of this new form of cross-cultural research on planning theory and practice may be the theme of some future AESOP event. …