Crisis Resource Management Skills Research Articles

Pitfalls in Emergency Medicine: Survey-Based Identification of Learning Objectives for Targeted Simulation Curricula by Emergency Department Staff.

Introduction: The emergency department is a complex practice environment into which numerous factors may introduce both human and system error. Emergency physicians have to assemble and manage multidisciplinary teams with a moment’s notice to manage critically ill patients. The EM training programs across Canada are diverse with considerable variation among programs. Acquisition of both high acuity low occurrence (HALO) and crisis resource management (CRM) skills are crucial to the development of proficient emergency room physicians. Physicians and allied health workers were surveyed to identify potential causes of error in local emergency departments and to find simulation-driven solutions. Methods: An anonymous survey was prepared to evaluate potential pitfalls of emergency care in St. John’s, NL, Canada. It was distributed electronically to 108 medical staff, including physicians, nurses, and postgraduate year three (PGY3) residents. Respondents were asked about their experience with simulation education, and whether or not they feel that there is an opportunity for it in postgraduate emergency medicine training. Results: The response rate was 30%. Communication - with the emergency department team, consulting services, and patients - was identified as a potential topic for simulation, along with interruptions. Burnout, busy department, departmental crowding, end of shift handover, and incomplete/missing patient medical history were identified as topics that should be included in the emergency medicine curriculum. Following a review with the simulation expert panel, it was determined that end of shift handover could also be incorporated as a simulation in the existing curriculum.Discussion: This survey looked at pitfalls in emergency medicine through a CRM lens. Six pitfalls were identified as important for patient safety, but not best addressed with simulation. These could be incorporated into the half-day curriculum as didactic lectures. Four important patient safety pitfalls were identified that could potentially be addressed with simulation and incorporated in the existing emergency medicine simulation curriculum.

Multisource Feedback in the Trauma Context: Priorities and Perspectives.

Trauma resuscitations require competence in both clinical and nonclinical skills but these can be difficult to observe and assess. Multisource feedback (MSF) is workplace-based, involves the direct observation of learners, and can provide feedback on nonclinical skills. We sought to compare and contrast the priorities of multidisciplinary trauma team members when assessing resident trauma team captain (TTC) performance. Additionally, we aimed to describe the nature of the assessment and perceived the utility of incorporating MSF into the trauma context. A convenience sample of 10 trauma team activations were observed. Following each activation, the attending physician trauma team leader (TTL), TTC, and a registered nurse (RN) participated in a semistructured interview. MSF was not provided to the TTC for the purpose of this study because MSF was not part of the assessment process of TTCs at the time of this study and maintaining anonymity may have encouraged more honest interview responses. Transcripts from each assessor group (TTL, TTC, RN) were coded and assigned to one of the five crisis resource management skills: leadership, communication, situational awareness, resource utilization, and problem-solving. Comments were also coded as positive, negative, or neutral as interpreted by the coder. All assessor groups mentioned communication skills most frequently. After communication, the RN and TTC groups commented on situational awareness most frequently, comprising 15 and 29% of their total responses, respectively, whereas 31% of the TTL comments focused on leadership skills. The RN and TTL groups provided positive assessments, with 51 and 42% of their respective comments coded as positive. Forty-five percent of self-assessment comments in the TTC group were negative. All (100%) of the TTC and TTL respondents felt that incorporating MSF would add to the quality of feedback, only 66% of the RN group felt that way. We found that each assessor group brings a unique focus and perspective to the assessment of resident TTC performance. The future inclusion of MSF in the trauma team context has the potential to enhance the learning environment in a clinical arena that is difficult to directly observe and assess.

Crisis Resource Management in Medicine: a Clarion Call for Change

Reliable data indicates increasing numbers of patients are harmed when receiving healthcare. The landmark paper “To Err is Human” posited that adverse events occur in the context of the complexity of systems within medicine and are not due to intentional harm. Crisis resource management (CRM) originated in aviation in 1980. CRM is defined as the cognitive, social, and personal resource skills that complement technical skills and contribute to safe task performance. It is a risk-reducing strategy utilized in aviation that has led to significant reduction in human error–related airline fatalities. CRM was adopted from commercial aviation by medicine in 1990 in an attempt to improve patient safety and reduce morbidity and mortality attributed to medical errors. In the last 40 years, commercial and military aviation has standardized CRM training which has led to a track record of success in improving safety for flight crews and passengers with flight-related mortality significantly decreasing. In stark contrast, nearly 30 years of CRM training in healthcare has been highly variable in content, quality, and outcomes. In this time, the number of patient deaths attributed to medical mistakes has increased from an estimated 50,000–100,000 in 1999 to over 250,000 per year from a 2016 estimate. It is time to reassess how CRM is being deployed in healthcare. Full CRM integration will require significant cultural and embedded organizational changes. Proficient CRM skills are a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for adverse event rate reduction: CRM should not be just what we do—it has to be a part of who we are as medical professionals.

A Microdebriefing Crisis Resource Management Program for Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation in a Community Hospital: A Feasibility Study.

Crisis Resource Management (CRM) is a team training tool used in healthcare to enhance team performance and improve patient safety. Our program intends to determine the feasibility of high-fidelity simulation for teaching CRM to an interprofessional team in a community hospital and whether a microdebriefing intervention can improve performance during simulated pediatric resuscitation. We conducted a single-center prospective interventional study with 24 teams drawn from 4 departments. The program was divided into an initial assessment simulation case (pre), a 40-minute microdebriefing intervention, and a final assessment simulation case (post). Post and pre results were analyzed for each team using t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Primary outcome measures included (a) completion of program, (b) percent enrollment, (c) participant reaction, and (d) support of continued programs on completion. Secondary outcomes included (a) change in teamwork performance, measured by the Clinical Teamwork Scale; (b) change in time to initiation of chest compressions and defibrillation; and (c) pediatric advanced life support adherence, measured by the Clinical Performance Tool. We successfully completed a large-scale training program with high enrollment. Twenty-four teams with 162 participants improved in Clinical Teamwork Scale scores (42.8%-57.5%, P < 0.001), Clinical Performance Tool scores (61.7%-72.1%, P < 0.001), and time to cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation (70.6-34.3 seconds, P < 0.001). Our center ran a well-attended, well-received interprofessional program in a community hospital site demonstrating that teaching CRM skills can improve simulated team performance in a diverse experienced cohort.

Best Practices and Theoretical Foundations for Simulation Instruction Using Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice.

Rapid-cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) is a learner-centered simulation instructional strategy that identifies performance gaps and targets feedback to improve individual or team deficiencies. Learners have multiple opportunities to practice observational, deductive, decision-making, psychomotor, and crisis resource management skills. As its implementation grows, simulationists need to have a shared mental model of RCDP to build high-quality RCDP-based initiatives. To compare and make general inferences from RCDP data, each training needs to follow a similar structure. This article seeks to describe the fundamentals of RCDP, including essential components and potential variants. We also summarize the current published evidence regarding RCDP's effectiveness. This article serves to create a shared understanding of RCDP, provide clear definitions and classifications for RCDP research, and provide options for future RCDP investigation.

Teaching Crisis Resource Management Skills to Nurses Using Simulation

Education programs teaching crisis resource management (CRM) skills (problem solving, situational awareness, resource utilization, communication, and leadership) have been shown to positively affect learner competence in handling crisis events. As part of an education program, a high-fidelity simulation program was used as a learning intervention to teach these skills to practicing nurses. In this repeated-measures observational study, 11 RNs were evaluated at four time points, measuring the effect of an education program on observed performance of CRM skills. Performance was measured using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale and a checklist tool. Statistically significant changes in mean scores occurred between times one and two, and nonstatistically significant improvement occurred in means overall. This study adds evidence of the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation education and highlights the need for further research. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2020;51(6):257-266.].

Stress Testing the Resuscitation Room: Latent Threats to Patient Safety Identified During Interprofessional In Situ Simulation in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department.

Emergency department (ED) resuscitation is a complex, high-stakes procedure where positive outcomes depend on effective interactions between the health care team, the patient, and the environment. Resuscitation teams work in dynamic environments and strive to ensure the timely delivery of necessary treatments, equipment, and skill sets when required. However, systemic failures in this environment cannot always be adequately anticipated, which exposes patients to opportunities for harm. As part of a new interprofessional education and quality improvement initiative, this prospective, observational study sought to characterize latent safety threats (LSTs) identified during the delivery of in situ, simulated resuscitations in our ED. In situ simulation (ISS) sessions were delivered on a monthly basis in the EDs at each campus of a large tertiary care academic hospital system, during which a variety of scenarios were run with teams of ED health care professionals. LSTs were identified by simulation facilitators and participants during the case and debriefing and then grouped thematically for analysis. During the study period, 22 ISS sessions were delivered, involving 58 cases and reaching 383 ED health care professionals. 196 latent safety threats were identified through these sessions (mean= 3.4 LSTs per case) of which 110 were determined to be "actionable" at a system level. LSTs identified included system/environmental design flaws, equipment problems, failures in department processes, and knowledge/skill gaps. Corrective mechanisms were initiated in 85% of actionable cases. Effective quality improvement and continuing education programs are essential to translate these findings into more resilient patient care.ISS, beyond its role as a training tool for developing intrinsic and crisis resource management skills, can be effectively used to identify system issues in the ED that could expose critically ill patients to harm.

249 Crisis Resource Management Training: The Blindfolded Resuscitation

Effective teamwork and communication are the cornerstone of patient safety in health care. Closed-loop communication (CLC) is a specific structure that improves task efficiency and decreases medical errors. There is limited literature on strategies to improve real-time use of CLC. The primary objective is to determine if blindfolding a resuscitation leader is effective in teaching CLC and crisis resource management (CRM) skills, as measured by an increase in the frequency of perfect CLC use. We also sought to determine if blindfolding altered overall CRM performance and perceived task load.

Evaluating Best Methods for Crisis Resource Management Education: Didactic Teaching or Noncontextual Active Learning.

Health care training traditionally focuses on medical knowledge; however, this is not the only component of successful patient management. Nontechnical skills, such as crisis resource management (CRM), have significant impact on patient care. This study examines whether there is a difference in CRM skills taught by traditional lecture in comparison with low-fidelity simulation consisting of noncontextual learning through team problem-solving activities. Two groups of multidisciplinary preclinical students were taught CRM through lecture or noncontextual active learning. Both groups were given a cardiopulmonary resuscitation simulation and clinical performance assessed by basic life support (BLS) checklist and CRM skills by Ottawa Global Rating Scale. The groups were reassessed at 4 months. A third group, who received no CRM education, served as a control group. The mean BLS scores after CRM education were 18.9 and 24.9 with mean Ottawa Global Rating Scale (GRS) scores of 22.4 and 29.1 in the didactic teaching and noncontextual groups, respectively. The difference between intervention groups was significant for BLS (P = 0.02) and Ottawa GRS (P = 0.03) score. At 4-month follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in BLS (P = 1.0) or Ottawa GRS score (P = 0.55) between intervention groups. In comparison with the control group, there was a marginally significant difference in Ottawa GRS score (P = 0.06) at 4-month follow-up. Noncontextual active learning of CRM using low-fidelity simulation results in improved CRM performance in comparison with didactic teaching. The benefits of CRM education do not seem to be sustained after one education session, suggesting the need for continued education and practice of skills to improve retention.

Are battlefield and prehospital trauma scenarios an effective educational tool to teach leadership and crisis resource management skills to undergraduate medical students?

IntroductionLeadership and crisis resource management (CRM) skills are important skills for doctors, however there is a recognised lack of undergraduate leadership education. There remains debate over how best to teach...

Starting to Think Like an Expert: An Analysis of Resident Cognitive Processes During Simulation-Based Resuscitation Examinations

Simulation is commonly used to teach crisis resource management skills and assess them in emergency medicine residents. However, our understanding of the cognitive processes underlying crisis resource management skills is limited because these processes are difficult to assess and describe. The objective of this study is to uncover and characterize the cognitive processes underlying crisis resource management skills and to describe how these processes vary between residents according to performance in a simulation-based examination. Twenty-two of 24 eligible emergency medicine trainees from 1 tertiary academic center completed 1 or 2 resuscitation-based examinations in the simulation laboratory. Resident performance was assessed by a blinded expert using an entrustment-based scoring tool. Participants wore eye-tracking glasses that generated first-person video that was used to augment subsequent interviews led by an emergency medicine faculty member. Interviews were audio recorded and then transcribed. An emergent thematic analysis was completed with a codebook that was developed by 4 research assistants, with subsequent analyses conducted by the lead research assistant with input from emergency medicine faculty. Themes from high- and low-performing residents were subsequently qualitatively compared. Higher-performing residents were better able to anticipate, selectively attend to relevant information, and manage cognitive demands, and took a concurrent (as opposed to linear) approach to managing the simulated patient. The results provide new insights into residents' cognitive processes while managing simulated patients in an examination environment and how these processes vary with performance. More work is needed to determine how best to apply these findings to improve crisis resource management education.

P001: Continuing professional development and faculty development: launching continuous practice enhancement for academic emergency physicians

Innovation Concept: Emergency medicine physicians must maintain a broad knowledge base and procedural skillset while fulfilling their academic roles as teachers, researchers and administrators. Most academic departments do not have a regular, affordable, formal continuing professional development (CPD) and faculty development (FD) curriculum for their staff. We set out to design and implement a novel continuous practice enhancement program to address this issue. Methods: Strategic planning by the Ottawa academic Department of EM identified CPD and FD as priorities. A program was created to support high quality, monthly CPD/FD courses provided by physicians. We had 5 goals: (1) enhance clinical and academic skills, (2) disseminate group best practices, (3) sustain skills in high impact/low frequency scenarios, (4) support physician academic careers, and (5) acquire new procedural skills. A CPD/FD Committee composed of local meded experts and experienced clinical teachers was tasked with overseeing the creation and evaluation of these sessions. Curriculum, Tool or Material: The longitudinal curriculum was informed by perceived needs (group survey), ascribed needs (M&amp;amp;M rounds, physician metrics and departmental leadership priorities) and participant feedback. The committee identified local experts to present on their areas of expertise in order to promote group best practice. Topics to-date have included clinical skills updates, teaching and coaching strategies and academic career planning. A comprehensive monthly simulation-based curriculum was rolled out simultaneously to give participants the opportunity to develop crisis resource management and critical care skills. Except for sessions requiring advanced equipment or cadavers, sessions are financed by academic funds and free for participants. Conclusion: Faculty academic learning and engagement is an important goal and participation in this curriculum is reviewed at each physician's annual reappointment. To-date, 18 physicians (21% of our group) have presented topics and 92% of physicians have participated in at least one session with 63% having attended three or more. Evaluations have been overwhelmingly positive, and a recent survey identified the CPD/FD program as a significant contributor to our physicians’ wellness. We introduced an innovative, structured CPD/FD program in response to perceived and ascribed needs of our physicians and departmental leadership. Our successful CPD/FD curriculum represents a model for other departments who are considering similar initiatives.

“SIMBurns”: A high-fidelity simulation program in emergency burn management developed through international collaboration

Acute management of a severely burned patient is an infrequent and stressful situation that requires medical knowledge as well as immediate coordinated action. Many adverse events in health care result from issues related to the application of ‘non-technical' skills such as communication, teamwork, leadership and decision making rather than lack of medical knowledge. Training in these skills is known as Crisis Resource Management (CRM) training.In order to create well-prepared burn teams, it is critical to teach CRM principles through high-fidelity simulation (HFS).While CRM teaches foundational non-technical skills, HFS incorporates lifelike, whole-body, fully-responsive mannequins in order to provide a realistic emergency situation.The aim of the study is to describe the development of a novel high-fidelity simulation course called “SIMBurns: High Fidelity Simulation Program for Emergency Burn Management” that uses CRM as its foundation and is focused on management of burn injuries. The course was designed by a panel of simulation and burns experts from Meyer Children’s Hospital in Italy and Birmingham Children’s Hospital in the U.K. Simulation Program experts were certified by Boston Children’s Hospital’s Simulation Program. In this paper, we describe the course’s design, development, structure, and participant’s assessment of the course. Since the creation of the SIMBurns course in 2013, 9 courses have been conducted and 101 participants have attended the course. The course was well-received and its “Overall Satisfaction” was rated at 4.8/5. The primary objective in the SIMBurns course – to teach teamwork and CRM skills to medical staff involved in emergency burn care – was also met at 4.8/5. Participants felt that the course developed their ability to interact with other team members, further improved their understanding of how to appropriately use resources, emphasized the importance of role clarity and developed their communication skills. Additional quantitative and qualitative analyses obtained from participants were also reviewed after each course. The SIMBurns course aims to contribute to the education of those in healthcare in order to improve patient safety and to continue advancing the education of our emergency burn care teams.

The Preferred Attributes of a Trauma Team Leader: Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment

Leaders of a pediatric trauma team are tasked with managing rapidly changing diagnostic and treatment challenges, while ensuring the entire team functions effectively to produce optimal patient outcomes. An effective trauma team leader is often thought to be self-evident, and there is little formal literature identifying the leadership characteristics and attributes associated with optimal trauma team performance. The purpose of this study was to elicit the trauma team leader traits and characteristics deemed of greatest utility by members of the pediatric trauma team. Members of the pediatric trauma team at British Columbia Children's Hospital were asked to participate in a semistructured interview to identify trauma team leader attributes associated with maximal team performance. Using the attributes, we constructed a discrete choice experiment (DCE). DCEs, developed in the economics and market research setting, allow participants to express preferences among finite alternatives, with subsequent statistical analysis that allows quantitative comparison of the utility of selected attributes. After interviewing 21 trauma team practitioners, 6 themes were identified as being most important for trauma team leadership. The developed DCE was administered to 64 members of the trauma team. Analysis of the DCE revealed the most important attributes were collaboration, strong communication, and decisiveness. The attribute of least utility was experience. The specific leadership qualities that provided the most utility to the trauma team included "actively involves input for team" (mean utility [MU]: 0.70; standard error [SE]: 0.11) and "concise communication, at times closed-loop" (MU: 0.52; SE: 0.09). "Hesitant and unclear communication" (MU: -0.88; SE: 0.09) and "often indecisive" (MU: -0.68; SE: 0.10) were deemed most detrimental (negative utility) to the team's function. This study is novel in applying a strategy to identify and quantify the relative value of trauma team leader attributes. When designing education initiatives for pediatric trauma care teams, defining trauma team quality metrics, and providing continuing medical education for the team leader, it is essential to incorporate preferred leadership characteristics. Crisis resource management skills benefit greatly from an understanding of the preferred attributes, as defined and evaluated by other trauma team members.

Just watching is not enough: Fostering simulation-based learning with collaboration scripts.

Aims: In addition to medical facts, medical students participating in simulation-based training are supposed to acquire general knowledge, e.g. heuristics to cope with critical incidents. While active participation is considered a major benefit of this kind of training, a large portion of students’ time is often spent observing peers acting in the simulator. Thus, we instructionally supported learners with a collaboration script (i.e., a set of scaffolds that distribute roles and activities among learners in group learning situations) during observational phases of a simulation-based training. Our script was designed to help learners focus on heuristics and to facilitate more (inter-)active participation. We hypothesised that scripted learners would benefit from the instructional support with respect to individual and collaborative learning processes as well as individual learning outcomes.Methods: Thirty-four medical students in their 7th to 12th semester participated in this field study with control group design. The independent variable was the collaboration script (with/without). Four voluntary emergency courses with a full-scale simulator were examined. The acquisition of skills related to Crisis Resource Management (CRM) heuristics was one of the learning goals of these courses. The collaboration script induced learners to perform specific activities during and after each observational phase of the training. Further, the script sequenced the order of activities and assigned roles to the learners. Learning processes were measured on an individual level (by means of notes taken by learners during observational phases) and on a collaborative level (by means of learners’ comments). Learning outcomes were measured with pre- and post-self-assessment of CRM skills and a brief video-based CRM skills test at the end of the course. Results: The collaboration script had the expected positive effect on individual and collaborative learning processes, leading to an increased focus on heuristic strategies and increased collaborative activity of scripted learners. There was no evidence that the experimental conditions differed regarding the objective measure of individual learning outcomes. However, self-assessment data revealed that students in the control condition perceived a higher improvement of CRM skills throughout the course. We suggest that our script might have helped learners adjust an illusion of their own competency – such an illusion may have appeared in the control group as a result of processing fluency. Conclusions: Findings suggest that simulation-based training in medical education can be enhanced with additional instructional support in the form of collaboration scripts designed to turn observational course phases into more active and better focused learning experiences.

LO10: Faculty sim: a simulation-based continuing professional development curriculum for academic emergency physicians

Introduction: Maintaining and enhancing competence in the breadth of Emergency Medicine (EM) is an ongoing challenge for all clinicians. In particular, resuscitative care in EM involves high-stakes clinical encounters that demand strong procedural skills, effective leadership, and up-to-date knowledge. However, Canadian emergency physicians are not required to complete any specific ongoing training for these encounters beyond general CPD requirements of professional colleges. Simulation-based medical education (SBME) is an effective modality for enhancing technical (e.g. procedural) and non-technical (i.e. Crisis Resource Management) skills in crisis situations, and has been embedded in undergraduate and postgraduate medical curricula worldwide. We present a novel comprehensive curriculum of simulation-based CPD designed specifically for academic emergency physicians (AEPs) at our centre. Methods: The curriculum development involved a departmental needs assessment survey, focus groups with AEPs, data from safety metrics and critical incidents, and consultations with senior departmental leadership. Institutional support was provided in the form of a $25,000 grant to fund a physician Program Lead, monthly session instructors, and simulation centre operating costs. Based on the results of the needs assessment, a two-year curriculum was mapped out and tailored to the available resources. Results: CPD simulation commenced in January 2017 and occurs monthly for three hours, immediately following departmental Grand Rounds to provide convenient scheduling. Our needs assessment identified two key types of educational needs: (1) Crisis Resource Management skills and (2) frequent practice of high-stakes critical care procedures (e.g. central lines). The first six months of implementation was dedicated to low-fidelity skills labs to facilitate the transition to SBME. After this, the program transitioned to a hybrid model involving two high-fidelity simulated resuscitations and one skills lab per session. Conclusion: We have introduced a comprehensive curriculum of ongoing simulation-based CPD in our department based on the educational needs of our AEPs. Key to our successful implementation has been support from educational and administrative leadership within our department. Ongoing challenges include securing adequate protected time from clinical duties for program facilitators and participants. Future work will include establishing permanent funding, CPD accreditation, and a formal program evaluation.

Getting Inside the Expert’s Head: An Analysis of Physician Cognitive Processes During Trauma Resuscitations

Crisis resource management skills are integral to leading the resuscitation of a critically ill patient. Despite their importance, crisis resource management skills (and their associated cognitive processes) have traditionally been difficult to study in the real world. The objective of this study was to derive key cognitive processes underpinning expert performance in resuscitation medicine, using a new eye-tracking-based video capture method during clinical cases. During an 18-month period, a sample of 10 trauma resuscitations led by 4 expert trauma team leaders was analyzed. The physician team leaders were outfitted with mobile eye-tracking glasses for each case. After each resuscitation, participants were debriefed with a modified cognitive task analysis, based on a cued-recall protocol, augmented by viewing their own first-person perspective eye-tracking video from the clinical encounter. Eye-tracking technology was successfully applied as a tool to aid in the qualitative analysis of expert performance in a clinical setting. All participants stated that using these methods helped uncover previously unconscious aspects of their cognition. Overall, 5 major themes were derived from the interviews: logistic awareness, managing uncertainty, visual fixation behaviors, selective attendance to information, and anticipatory behaviors. The novel approach of cognitive task analysis augmented by eye tracking allowed the derivation of 5 unique cognitive processes underpinning expert performance in leading a resuscitation. An understanding of these cognitive processes has the potential to enhance educational methods and to create new assessment modalities of these previously tacit aspects of expertise in this field.

Postpartum Magnesium Sulfate Overdose: A Multidisciplinary and Interprofessional Simulation Scenario.

This case is one of an eight-case multidisciplinary curriculum designed and implemented at the University of Ottawa by simulation educators with specialty training in obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) and anesthesiology. Consultation with a nurse educator maintained the quality and relevance of objectives for nursing participants.The curriculum was prepared to train OB/GYN and anesthesiology residents and labor and delivery nurses to hone crisis resource management skills and to recognize and manage rare/critical medical events in an obstetrical setting. Obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and nurses often work together in acute, high-stakes situations and this curriculum provides a safe environment to practice team-based management of such emergencies.Over an eight-year period, this curriculum has been executed in scenario couplets in a four-year cycle to allow OB/GYN and anesthesiology residents exposure to all scenarios during a five-year residency, beginning in their second year. Prospective evaluative data has been positive. For example, over 90% of participants rated these simulations to be 5 out of 5 for “Was an effective use of my educational time” and “Will influence/enhance my future practice.”In this scenario, participants must evaluate and treat a postpartum preeclamptic woman who is being treated with magnesium sulfate for the purpose of seizure prophylaxis. The patient experiences magnesium sulfate toxicity and subsequent respiratory arrest. Any mannequin that can display vital signs can be used for this scenario.This simulation case includes a case template, critical actions checklist, debriefing guide, summary of key medical content, and an evaluation form for learners to provide feedback.

Does the age of acute care physicians impact their (1) crisis management performance and (2) learning after simulation-based education? A protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study in Toronto and Ottawa, Canada

IntroductionThe proportion of older acute care physicians (ACPs) has been steadily increasing. Ageing is associated with physiological changes and prospective research investigating how such age-related physiological changes affect clinical performance,...

Crisis Resource Management in the Delivery Room: Development of Behavioral Markers for Team Performance in Emergency Simulation.

Human factors are the most relevant issues contributing to adverse events in obstetrics. Specific training of Crisis Resource Management (CRM) skills (i.e., problem solving and team management, resource allocation, awareness of environment, and dynamic decision-making) is now widespread and is often based on High Fidelity Simulation. In order to be used as a guideline in simulated scenarios, CRM skills need to be mapped to specific and observable behavioral markers. For this purpose, we developed a set of observable behaviors related to the main elements of CRM in the delivery room. The observational tool was then adopted in a two-days seminar on obstetric hemorrhage where teams working in obstetric wards of six Italian hospitals took part in simulations. The tool was used as a guide for the debriefing and as a peer-to-peer feedback. It was then rated for its usefulness in facilitating the reflection upon one’s own behavior, its ease of use, and its usefulness for the peer-to-peer feedback. The ratings were positive, with a median of 4 on a 5-point scale. The CRM observational tool has therefore been well-received and presents a promising level of inter-rater agreement. We believe the tool could have value in facilitating debriefing and in the peer-to-peer feedback.