Abstract

Human factors are the most relevant issues contributing to adverse events in obstetrics. Specific training of Crisis Resource Management (CRM) skills (i.e., problem solving and team management, resource allocation, awareness of environment, and dynamic decision-making) is now widespread and is often based on High Fidelity Simulation. In order to be used as a guideline in simulated scenarios, CRM skills need to be mapped to specific and observable behavioral markers. For this purpose, we developed a set of observable behaviors related to the main elements of CRM in the delivery room. The observational tool was then adopted in a two-days seminar on obstetric hemorrhage where teams working in obstetric wards of six Italian hospitals took part in simulations. The tool was used as a guide for the debriefing and as a peer-to-peer feedback. It was then rated for its usefulness in facilitating the reflection upon one’s own behavior, its ease of use, and its usefulness for the peer-to-peer feedback. The ratings were positive, with a median of 4 on a 5-point scale. The CRM observational tool has therefore been well-received and presents a promising level of inter-rater agreement. We believe the tool could have value in facilitating debriefing and in the peer-to-peer feedback.

Highlights

  • The number of adverse events in obstetrics is dramatically relevant because of to the complexity of the operational environment

  • We reported the behavioral markers we already developed in the MINTS-DR [24], a set of non-technical skills for anesthetists, gynecologists, midwives, and assistants working in the delivery room

  • This research aimed to develop an observational tool based on the Crisis Resource Management (CRM) points proposed by Gaba and colleagues [10], adapted for the delivery room

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The number of adverse events in obstetrics is dramatically relevant because of to the complexity of the operational environment. Up to 5% of obstetric cases are characterized by injuries or even death of the patient, due to factors that could have been prevented or mitigated [1,2]. Among these contributing factors, poor communication and ineffective teamwork contribute to the vast majority of adverse outcomes [3]. Clinical errors are mainly due to team, system, or process failure, rather than individual mistakes [4]; as a consequence, any training oriented to reduce clinical errors should address interprofessional teams [5]. Public Health 2018, 15, 439; doi:10.3390/ijerph15030439 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.