Craniofacial Surgery Research Articles

"Travel Burden to ACPA Approved Cleft and Craniofacial Teams: A Geospatial Analysis".

Despite the existence of American Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Association (ACPA)-approved Cleft and Craniofacial Teams, access to multidisciplinary team-based care remains challenging for patients from rural areas, leading to disparities in care. We investigated the geospatial relationship between U.S. counties and ACPA-approved centers. The geographic location of all ACPA-approved cleft and craniofacial centers in the U.S. was identified. Distance between individual U.S. counties (n=3,142) and their closest ACPA-approved team was determined. Counties were mapped based on distance to nearest cleft or craniofacial team. Distance calculations were combined with U.S Census data to model the number of children served by each team and economic characteristics of families served. These relationships were analyzed using independent t-tests and ANOVA. Over 40% of U.S. counties did not have access to an ACPA-approved craniofacial team within a 100-mile radius (n=1,267) versus 29% for cleft teams (n=909). Over 90% of counties greater than 100 miles to a craniofacial team had a population <7,500 (n=1,150). Of the counties >100 miles from a cleft team, 64% had a child poverty rate greater than national average (n=579). Counties with the highest birth rate and >100 miles to travel to an ACPA team are in the Mountain West. Given the time-sensitive nature of operative intervention and access to multidisciplinary care, the lack of equitable distribution in certified cleft and craniofacial teams is concerning. Centers may better serve families from distant areas by establishing satellite clinics, telehealth visits, and training local primary care providers in referral practices.

Autologous Fat Transfer in Craniofacial Surgery

Over the past two decades, autologous fat transfer has garnered significant recognition and widespread adoption within esthetic and reconstructive surgical domains. In craniofacial surgery, fat transplantation is frequently employed to address soft tissue volumetric deficiencies and asymmetries that influence facial contours. While adipose tissue (AT) is widely regarded as an optimal choice for augmentation due to its abundant availability and biocompatibility, the unpredictability and heightened resorption rates observed with traditional lipofilling techniques present a challenge for clinicians. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) housed within the grafted tissue play a pivotal role in graft survival and offer avenues for tissue repair due to their angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and immunosuppressive properties. Micro Fragmentation of Adipose Tissue (MFAT), utilized in several FDA-approved processing devices, has demonstrated promising outcomes in treating osteoarthritic joints, with success primarily attributed to enhanced paracrine function of ASCs via preservation of the perivascular niche. Currently, its application for treating bone or articular defects in the craniofacial region, including abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint, remains limited. This scarcity underscores the need for further investigation prior to its widespread integration into clinical practice.

SCALP COMPLICATIONS OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Methods: By the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. This search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed, SagePub, and Google Scholar were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done. Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search get 21 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub get 87 articles, on Google Scholar 2350 articles. Records remove before screening are 1983, so we get 475 articles fos screening. After we screened based on record exclude, we compiled a total of 10 papers. We included five research that met the criteria. Conclusion: For craniofacial surgery, understanding the surgical anatomy, identifying risk factors, adequate surgical planning, and interdisciplinary cooperation between neurosurgeons, plastic surgeons, and the interdisciplinary team are essential to prevent and treat scalp complications.

In Vitro Assessment of the Neuro-Compatibility of Fe-20Mn as a Potential Bioresorbable Material for Craniofacial Surgery.

Background and Objectives: Spring-assisted surgery is a popular option for the treatment of non-syndromic craniosynostosis. The main drawback of this procedure is the need for a second surgery for spring removal, which could be avoided if a distractor material could be metabolised over time. Iron-Manganese alloys (FeMn) have a good trade-off between degradation rate and strength; however, their biocompatibility is still debated. Materials and Methods: In this study, the neuro-compatibility of Fe-20Mn (wt.%) was assessed using standard assays. PC-12 cells were exposed to Fe-20Mn (wt.%) and stainless steel via indirect contact. To examine the cytotoxicity, a Cell Tox Green assay was carried out after 1, 2, and 3 days of incubation. Following differentiation, a neurite morphological examination after 1 and 7 days of incubation time was carried out. The degradation response in modified Hank's solution at 1, 3, and 7 days was investigated, too. Results: The cytotoxicity assay showed a higher toxicity of Fe-20Mn than stainless steel at earlier time points; however, at the latest time point, no differences were found. Neurite morphology was similar for cells exposed to Fe-20Mn and stainless steel. Conclusions: In conclusion, the Fe-20Mn alloy shows promising neuro-compatibility. Future studies will focus on in vivo studies to confirm the cellular response to Fe-20Mn.

Buccal Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as a Source of Osseointegration of Titanium Implants.

We studied the interaction of human buccal mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and osteoblasts differentiated from them with the surface of titanium samples. MSCs were isolated by enzymatic method from buccal fat pads. The obtained cell culture was presented by MSCs, which was confirmed by flow cytometry and differentiation into adipocytes and osteoblasts. Culturing of buccal MSCs on titanium samples was accompanied by an increase in the number of cells for 15 days and the formation of a developed network of F-actin fibers in the cells. The viability of buccal MSCs decreased by 8 days, but was restored by 15 days. Culturing of osteoblasts obtained as a result of buccal MSC differentiation on the surface of titanium samples was accompanied by a decrease in their viability and proliferation. Thus, MSCs from buccal fat pads can be used to coat implants to improve osseointegration during bone reconstruction in craniofacial surgery and dentistry. To improve the integration of osteoblasts, modification of the surface of titanium samples is required.

Surgical Simulation Using a Three-Dimensional Printer

3D printers have been applied in bone-based surgeries, including craniofacial, plastic, oral, and orthopedic surgeries. The improved capabilities of diagnostic imaging equipment and 3D printers have enabled the development of more precise models, and research on surgical simulations and training in the field of neurosurgery is increasing. This review outlines the use of 3D printers in neurosurgery at our institution in terms of modeling methods and surgical simulations. Modeling with the powder-sticking lamination method using plaster as the material allows drilling, which is a surgical procedure. Therefore, it is useful for simulating skull base tumors, such as petrosectomy in a combined transpetrosal approach or anterior clinoidectomy in an orbitozygomatic approach. The color coding of each part of the model facilitates anatomical understanding, and meshed tumor modeling allows deep translucency. As shown above, the 3D printer's modeling ingenuity allows for useful surgical simulations for each case.

Clinical Research Fellowship Fosters Mentorship, Teamwork, and Productivity: Our 11-Year Experience With a Craniofacial Research Fellowship.

This study describes the development and explores the academic impact of a cleft and craniofacial research fellowship. Research and career outcomes from 3 cleft and craniofacial surgeons, 14 clinical fellows, and 25 research fellows between 2010 and 2023 were examined. Academic productivity was measured by the number of peer-reviewed publications indexed in PubMed and podium presentations at national/international meetings. Residency match statistics were recorded for eligible research fellows. Over this 14-year period (11 with research fellows), the team produced 500 publications in 96 peer-reviewed journals, with 153 (31%) in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 117 (23%) in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, and 32 (6%) in The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Yearly publications increased from 15.3±7.6 per year (before fellowship) to 23.0±5.3 (with 1 fellow) to 38.3±12.9 (2 fellows) to 81.0±5.7 (3 fellows; P<0.001). There was a strong annual linear growth in publications since the beginning the research fellowship position (r=0.88, P<0.001). All (100%) clinical research fellows developed strong relationships with senior surgeons, and all who applied to plastic surgery residency matched a significantly higher success rate than the national average (P<0.05). Implementing a structured cleft and craniofacial clinical research fellowship was associated with a broad impact across all cleft and craniofacial team members, as reflected by increased academic output and high match rates among fellows. The fellowship also strengthens the talent pipeline into plastic surgery by fostering meaningful mentor/mentee relationships and provides a model that can be adopted in both surgical and nonsurgical fields.

Surface modification of PEEK implants for craniofacial reconstruction and aesthetic augmentation-fiction or reality?

Facial implantology, a crucial facet of plastic and reconstructive surgery, focuses on optimizing implant materials for facial augmentation and reconstruction. This manuscript explores the use of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in craniofacial surgery, highlighting the challenges and advancements in this field. While PEEK offers mechanical resilience, durability, and compatibility with imaging modalities, its biologically inert nature hinders integration with the host tissue, which may lead to complications. In this systematic review, our aim was to assess the current state of knowledge regarding the clinical evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in facial implantology, with a focus on craniofacial augmentation and reconstruction in human studies. Additionally, we explore and discuss surface and structural modifications that may enhance bioreactivity and reduce complications in PEEK implants. A systematic review identified 32 articles detailing the use of PEEK Patient-Specific Implants (PSIs) in 194 patients for both reconstructive and aesthetic purposes. Complications, including infections and implant failures, were reported in 18% of cases, suggesting the need for improved implant materials. The discussion delves into the limitations of PEEK, prompting the exploration of surface and structural modifications to enhance its bioreactivity. Strategies, such as hydroxyapatite coating, titanium coating, and porous structures show promise in improving osseointegration and reducing complications. However, the literature review did not reveal reports of coated or modified PEEK in facial reconstructive or aesthetic surgery. In conclusion, although PEEK implants have been successfully used in craniofacial reconstruction, their biological inertness poses challenges. Surface modifications, particularly hydroxyapatite coatings, provide opportunities to promote osseointegration. Future research should focus on prospective long-term studies, especially in craniofacial surgery, to investigate the stability of uncoated PEEK implants and the potential benefits of surface modifications in clinical applications. Patient-specific PEEK implants hold promise for achieving durable craniofacial reconstruction and augmentation.

Goldenhar syndrome with limbal neoformation, microtia and skeletal deformities: a case report and literature review

BackgroundTo report a case of a 4-year-old patient with Goldenhar syndrome.Case presentationThe author presents a rare case report involving a 4-year-old boy with multiple malformations. A comprehensive examination showed that the patient primarily had a limbal dermoid. He also has bilateral microtia and ear canal deformities. The skull CT scan and spine X-ray showed Maxillofacial Abnormalities and scoliosis. Whole Exome Sequencing revealed potential gene variations related to microtia. Although certain circumstances prevented us from initiating follow-up treatment for the patient, we have provided a detailed account of the diagnostic methodologies used for this condition.ConclusionsGoldenhar syndrome is a congenital condition, predominantly presenting as sporadic cases. Its diagnosis and management typically necessitate the involvement of multiple disciplines, including otolaryngology and craniofacial surgery. The syndrome encompasses a variety of craniofacial features, which can facilitate early diagnosis and guide subsequent therapeutic interventions.

Predisposing Factors for Postoperative Complications in the Year Following Fronto-Orbital Advancement and Remodeling: A Single Institution Study of 267 Patients.

Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) is a common surgical approach used for craniosynostosis conferring functional and aesthetic benefit. There are few reports examining predisposing factors for postoperative complications within the first year after surgery. This study aimed to establish complication rates and identify risk factors for inferior outcomes in a large population of patients undergoing FOAR. All patients who underwent fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling from 2013-2022 at our institution were retrospectively studied. Perioperative and postoperative data were collected to yield outcomes analyses. Multivariable logistic regression with backwards selection was performed to identify predictors of postoperative complications. 267 patients underwent FOAR. The overall complication rate was 14.2%, most commonly delayed wound healing (7.4%), postoperative blood transfusion (5.8%), and infection requiring readmission (1.9%). Tense closure independently predicted delayed wound healing (p<0.001) and infection requiring readmission (p=0.03). Syndromic patients were more likely than non-syndromic children to have undergone prior craniofacial surgery (45.3% vs 23.8%, p=0.003). Syndromic status and prior craniofacial surgery were associated with increased risk of developing infection requiring readmission (p=0.012 and p=0.004, respectively). A greater proportion of malnourished patients experienced postoperative complications compared to patients without malnourishment (24.4% vs 12.1%, p=0.031), though there were no significant differences in individual postoperative outcomes. Identified risk factors for complications included syndromic status, tense closure, and prior craniofacial surgery. Most complications were managed nonoperatively. These factors may be considered in preoperative planning and when counseling patient families.

Advances in Bioengineering: Head Bone Replacement in Humans

This article presents an extensive review of the latest breakthroughs in cranial bone replacement, a major innovation in bioengineering and regenerative medicine. This paper examines conventional techniques for treating cranial bone disorders, including artificial implants and autografts, and notes their drawbacks. The article examines advanced methods, such as 3D bioprinting, bioactive scaffolds, and therapies based on stem cells, which provide a hopeful substitute for patients. It underscores the significance of interdisciplinary teamwork of biologists, material scientists, and healthcare professionals in promoting these advances. Furthermore, the article addresses ethical considerations relating to identity and consent. Furthermore, this study explores the potential impact of head bone replacement on patient outcomes, quality of life, and the healthcare system. These advancements have the potential to redefine craniofacial surgery and enhance the lives of individuals who suffer from head bone-related ailments. This marks a significant milestone in the evolution of bioengineering.

Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review.

Sagittal craniosynostosis, a rare but fascinating craniofacial anomaly, presents a unique challenge for both diagnosis and treatment. This condition involves premature fusion of the sagittal suture, which alters the normal growth pattern of the skull and can affect neurological development. Sagittal craniosynostosis is characterised by a pronounced head shape, often referred to as scaphocephaly. Asymmetry of the face and head, protrusion of the fontanel, and increased intracranial pressure are common clinical manifestations. Early recognition of these features is crucial for early intervention, and understanding the aetiology is, therefore, essential. Although the exact cause remains unclear, genetic factors are thought to play an important role. Mutations in genes such as FGFR2 and FGFR3, which disrupt the normal development of the skull, are suspected. Environmental factors and various insults during pregnancy can also contribute to the occurrence of the disease. An accurate diagnosis is crucial for treatment. Imaging studies such as ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional reconstructions play a crucial role in visualising the prematurely fused sagittal suture. Clinicians also rely on a physical examination and medical history to confirm the diagnosis. Early detection allows for quick intervention and better treatment outcomes. The treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes neurosurgery, craniofacial surgery, and paediatric care. Traditional treatment consists of an open reconstruction of the cranial vault, where the fused suture is surgically released to allow normal growth of the skull. However, advances in minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic strip craniectomy, are becoming increasingly popular due to their lower morbidity and shorter recovery times. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of sagittal craniosynostosis, highlighting the aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, and current treatment options.

Reasons for Removal of Rigid Internal Fixation Devices in Craniofacial Surgery: A 20-year Update.

The hardware utilized for rigid internal fixation of the craniofacial skeleton has evolved over time. Thus, the reasons for the unplanned removal of hardware continue to change. The purpose of this study is to compare past (1989-1995) and present (2000-2020) patient cohorts to establish trends related to unplanned removal of craniofacial hardware. A retrospective review study was designed. Data from our institution's original publication describing the unplanned removal of craniofacial hardware (1989-1995) was obtained. Data related to patients who underwent unplanned removal of hardware from 2000 to 2020 was collected from the electronic medical record. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed to compare demographics, reasons for hardware placement, and reasons for unplanned hardware removal between cohorts. This study includes 55 patients treated from 1989 to 1995 and 184 patients treated from 2000 to 2020. The average age at hardware placement decreased from 32 years (1989-1995) to 28 years (2000-2020). The most common reason for hardware placement changed from motor vehicle accident (1989-1995) to congenital deformity (2000-2020). The length of time with hardware in situ increased from 13 months (1989-1995) to 25 months (2000-2020). The most common reason for hardware removal changed from prominent hardware (1989-1995) to hardware exposure (2000-2020). In summary, patients who underwent rigid internal fixation of the craniofacial skeleton from 2000 to 2020 retained their hardware 2 times longer than patients treated from 1989 to 1995. Factors potentially contributing to increased retention include improved surgical technique, decreased profile of hardware, and increased surgeon experience. Further studies are warranted to define preoperative risk factors for unplanned hardware removal.

Sixty Years of Innovation in Biomechanical Orthognathic Surgery: The State of the Art and Future Directions

Craniofacial surgery is proposed and performed for a variety of reasons, ranging from congenital or acquired malformations to emotional disorders and parafunctions of the masticatory, respiratory, auditory, and visual systems. Surgery of the mandible and its orthostatic repositioning is the most common of these corrections of craniofacial anomalies. Throughout the history of these procedures, various techniques have been proposed and perfected, but always with a high rate of minor and major complications. The recurrence rate of mandibular malposition is high, as is the temporary loss of facial sensitivity and motor skills. These outcomes are often related to the choice of surgical technique rather than the skill of the surgeon, which is considered to be one of the most important factors in the final outcome. Surgical techniques involving direct manipulation of the vascular-nervous bundles, such as bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, clearly present the possibility of major or minor complications. In this study, an orthognathic surgical technique, performed by the same team for over 40 years and now available through a 20-year postoperative patient follow-up study, is presented with a literature review relating it to biomechanical concepts and bone remodeling to analyze the evolution of orthognathic surgery since it became common practice to correct maxillofacial discrepancies. In this review, we also present a case report in which previous orthodontic treatment prepared a patient for surgical correction of mandibular bone discrepancy without the need for combined maxillary and/or genioplasty, and we describe the most commonly used techniques today, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. The combination of established concepts together promotes favorable stability of mandibular osteotomies, functional anatomical positioning of the temporomandibular joint, reduced risk of injury to the mandibular vasculo-nervous bundle, and good aesthetics with positive patient acceptance and no relapse, thus these are the objectives for proposing innovative treatments that combine the technologies available today.

The Sonopet iQ® Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator in Craniofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis

Background: The Sonopet iQ® Ultrasonic Aspirator is a surgical tool used for the fragmentation and emulsification of bone and soft tissue. Ultrasonic vibrations emulsify bone with cited benefits of decreased damage to surrounding soft tissue and minimal heat dispersion. Despite these potential benefits, there is a paucity of published articles on the safety and efficacy of the Sonopet® in the setting of craniofacial surgery. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE and Pubmed were searched for articles that studied use of the Sonopet® for osteotomies in the craniofacial setting. Studies exclusively investigating soft tissue aspiration were excluded. Results: Out of 61 articles discovered, 22 met inclusion criteria and discussed a total of 816 patients. Of the 22 articles, there were 8 retrospective chart reviews, 7 case series, 5 cadaver models, and 2 case reports. Studies spanned multiple disciplines including otolaryngology, ophthalmology, craniofacial surgery, neurosurgery, and oral and maxillofacial surgery. Despite its frequent use in orthognathic and cranial vault remodeling surgery, only 4 studies described its use in these fields. The most commonly cited benefits of the Sonopet® were enhanced ergonomics and safety, discussed in 20 of the included studies. Eighteen studies claimed the Sonopet® was safer to use in surgically tight spaces compared to traditional drills. Four studies found decreased bone dust generation by the Sonopet® compared to conventional cutting devices. No studies reported an increase in postoperative complications due to the device. The most commonly cited disadvantage was the cost of the device, however, the majority of authors believed the benefits of the device outweighed the increase in cost. Conclusions: There is a dearth of research investigating the use of the Sonopet® in craniofacial surgery. Available studies emphasize the ergonomic and safety benefits of the Sonopet® and encourage expanded use of the device despite its cost.

Computer-Generated modelling in surgery

The applications of computer-generated modelling in surgery are increasing and diverse. Surgeons utilise these models for preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. In this chapter, techniques for 3D reconstruction, including volume rendering, surface rendering, and voxel-based methods are described. We are discussing advantages and limitations of these techniques, and its impact on surgical and procedure planning. The models may improve surgical accuracy and efficiency, reduce intraoperative risks and ultimately improve patient outcomes. In complex procedures, such as craniofacial surgery or organ transplantation, 3D models provide unprecedented detail, aiding surgeons in navigating critical structures. We will also discuss the role of computer-generated models in surgical simulation and training. These models offer a safe and effective environment for surgeons to hone their skills and practice intricate procedures without risk to patients.

Surgical Complexity and Physician Workload in Craniofacial Surgery: Do RVUs Need to be Adjusted?

RVU valuations need to be revisited regularly as procedure complexity and patient care pathways continue to evolve. The NSQIP-P database was queried for craniofacial procedures performed in North America between 2012 and 2019. Multivariate regression was performed to determine correlation coefficients of perioperative variables deemed to reflect procedure severity, including procedure duration, blood transfusion, length of stay, serious adverse events, related readmission, and related reoperation. CPT 21159 Le Fort III with forehead advancement remains the craniofacial procedure with the highest RVUs using our model at 33.93 units. The most underestimated procedure is CPT 42235 Repair of anterior palate, including vomer flap, with a suggested change of +8.27 units, which is a 194% increase from current compensation. Adjusted RVUs based on quantitative and nationally representative perioperative variables that reflect procedure severity might be a better alternative for procedure valuation over current survey methods to determine appropriate insurance compensation.

Prevalence of craniosynostosis in Finland, 1987-2010: A population-based study.

Craniosynostosis is a prevalent craniofacial malformation in Finland; however, comprehensive population-based epidemiological data are limited. This study aimed to estimate the total and birth prevalence of craniosynostosis in Finland from 1987 to 2010 and examine temporal trends. We collected the data from nationwide registers maintained by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and Statistics Finland, as well as treating hospitals, encompassing live births, stillbirths, terminations for fetal anomalies, and infant deaths with suspected or diagnosed craniosynostosis or skull deformation. A craniofacial surgeon and a clinical geneticist reviewed 1878 medical records for diagnostic confirmation. Out of 877 craniosynostosis cases, 83% were single-suture synostoses (all live births), 10% craniosynostosis syndromes, and 7% multisutural non-syndromic synostoses. Live birth prevalence from 1987 to 2010 was 6.0/10,000 live births, ranging from 5.0/10,000 in 1987 to 7.5/10,000 in 2010. Total prevalence, including live births, stillbirths, and terminations, varied from 5.0/10,000 in 1987 to 8.0/10,000 in 2010. Sagittal synostosis was the most common synostosis, with a prevalence of 3.9/10,000 live births, followed by metopic (0.6/10,000), unicoronal (0.4/10,000), and unilambdoid (0.1/10,000) synostoses. The total combined prevalence of all craniosynostosis types significantly increased driven by a nonsignificant rise across all subgroups and a significant increase in the syndrome group. In live births increase was significant only within the syndrome subgroup, primarily due to an increase in Muenke syndrome patients. The rising prevalence of syndromes necessitates further investigation. Contrasting with trends in Europe, Australia, and the USA, Finland showed no significant increase in metopic craniosynostosis.

The Use and Outcomes of 3D Printing in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has demonstrated efficacy in multiple surgical specialties. As accessibility improves, its use in specific fields deserves further attention. We conducted a systematic review of the implementation and outcomes of 3D printing in pediatric craniofacial surgery, as none has been performed. A systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Clinicaltrials.gov were queried with combinations of the terms: "3D printing," "craniofacial," "surgery," and "pediatric." Original human studies containing patients <18 years old implementing 3D printing to aid in craniofacial surgery were included. Study selection, grading, and data extraction were performed independently by multiple authors. After screening 120 articles, 7 (3 case series and 4 case reports) were included, published from 2017 to 2022. All studies addressed patients with different disease processes including craniosynostosis, cleft lip/palate, and mandibular hypoplasia. 3D printing was used to create mock surgical models in 2 studies, intraoperative cutting guides/molds (CGs) in 6 studies, and cranioplasty implants in 2 studies. Two case series determined the accuracy of the CGs was acceptable within historical comparison, while 4 articles included subjective statements on improved accuracy. Five studies noted reduced operating time, 2 noted reduced intraoperative blood loss, and 1 felt the use of 3D printed materials was responsible for shorter hospitalization duration. No adverse events were reported. Despite the limitations of the current literature, all studies concluded that the use of 3D printing in pediatric craniofacial surgery was beneficial. Definitive conclusions cannot be made until further controlled research is performed.

Balancing beauty and science: a review of facial implant materials in craniofacial surgery.

Facial reconstruction and augmentation, integral in facial plastic surgery, address defects related to trauma, tumors infections, and congenital skeletal deficiencies. Aesthetic considerations, including age-related facial changes, involve volume loss and diminished projection, often associated with predictable changes in the facial skeleton. Autologous, allogeneic, and alloplastic implants are used to address these concerns. Autologous materials such as bone, cartilage, and fat, while longstanding options, have limitations, including unpredictability and resorption rates. Alloplastic materials, including metals, polymers, and ceramics, offer alternatives. Metals like titanium are biocompatible and used primarily in fracture fixation. Polymers, such as silicone and polyethylene, are widely used, with silicone presenting migration, bony resorption, and visibility issues. Polyethylene, particularly porous polyethylene (MedPor), was reported to have one of the lowest infection rates while it becomes incorporated into the host. Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) exhibits mechanical strength and compatibility with imaging modalities, with custom PEEK implants providing stable results. Acrylic materials, like poly-methylmethacrylate (PMMA), offer strength and is thus mostly used in the case of cranioplasty. Bioceramics, notably hydroxyapatite (HaP), offer osteoconductive and inductive properties, and HaP granules demonstrate stable volume retention in facial aesthetic augmentation. Combining HaP with other materials, such as PLA, may enhance mechanical stability. 3D bioprinting with HaP-based bioinks presents a promising avenue for customizable and biocompatible implants. In conclusion, various materials have been used for craniofacial augmentation, but none have definitively demonstrated superiority. Larger randomized controlled trials are essential to evaluate short- and long-term complications comprehensively, potentially revolutionizing facial balancing surgery.