In the present study, the impact of test temperature, specimen geometry, and evaluation methodologies on the fracture toughness of 316L stainless steel was evaluated. Tensile and fracture mechanics tests were conducted utilizing a cryostat across a range of temperatures from ambient conditions to liquid hydrogen environments. The analysis of crack length prediction and resistance curve was performed using two fracture toughness evaluation methods: the unloading compliance method and the normalization method. The difference in fracture toughness by specimen thickness using the normalization method was within acceptable tolerances for all temperatures. However, fracture toughness evaluation using the unloading compliance method showed apparent negative crack growth at all temperatures, causing differences in J-integrals between specimen thicknesses and discrepancies between physical and estimated crack extensions. The application of the offset technique to the unloading compliance method significantly reduced these differences and made the J-integral of the normalization method and the unloading compliance method agree well. The substantial underestimation in the correction of the rotation angle at ambient temperatures was confirmed through real-time imaging of the crack tip with the unloading compliance method, which contributed to the large deviations between estimated and measured crack extensions.
Read full abstract