sp0 Normalizations permit application to a wide range of materials. The results, for selected levels of asperity density, are consolidated upon comparing the crack opening displacement (COD) with the roughness (s0) over four orders of magnitude. Specifically, a nonlinear relationship between COD/s0 and crack opening stress was established that can be readily used to determine crack opening stress over a broad range of conditions. The model has been utilized to predict crack opening stress levels for several materials, including 0.8 pct C steels, 9Cr-1Mo steels, Ti-4Al, Ti-46Al (g-aluminide), and Al 2124 alloys. Experimental measurements of crack roughness and asperity density were conducted on titanium aluminide specimens using confocal microscopy, and crack closure predictions were made with the model. The predictions demonstrated very good agreement with the experimentally measured closure levels. I. INTRODUCTION THE modification of the stress intensity factor based on crack closure has been universally applied to explain the experimental observations of fatigue crack growth behavior under various mechanical loading conditions and in various metallic alloys. For an overview of the topic, the reader is referred to the textbook by Suresh [1] and the overview by Sehitoglu et al. [2] However, to develop a better understanding of the intrinsic mechanisms of crack growth in various materials due to mechanical and microstructural factors, it is particularly important to determine the individual influences of crack closure due to plasticity, roughness, and oxide effects. Then, the effect of each of these mechanisms can be isolated to develop more advanced models for crack advance. Since a quantitative description of crack roughness effects has not been previously derived, the present work has undertaken this task. In many materials, when the crack advance is influenced by crystallographic slip or when the crack encounters microstructural barriers, the crack paths are nonflat and the crack can deviate from the normal mode I growth plane. The nonflatness of crack surfaces has been known to enhance the resistance of a material to fatigue crack growth. This resistance can develop in cases when the crack surfaces are viewed as nominally flat at the macrolevel, but there could be many periodic deviations from a smooth crack surface in the forms of asperities at the microlevel. These asperities could interlock at very low loads, or slide and crush in the presence of sufficient loading, resulting in an alteration of the crack surface profile as the crack advances. Combining the interaction of many asperities results in stresses in the crack wake which, in turn, have to