Honorable Court Research Articles

Guest Editorial: Issues That Divide: The Triumph of Secular Humanism

LEO PFEFFER (B.S.S., City College of New York; J.D., New York University) is Professor of Constitutional Law and Chairman of the Department of Political Sci ence, Long Island University, Brooklyn, New York, and Special Counsel, American Jewish Congress. He is the author of Church, State and (1953; rev. ed., 1967) ; Liberties of an American (1956; rev. ed., 1963) ; Creeds in Competition: Creative Force in American Culture (1958) ; (with Anson Phelps Stokes) Church and State in the United States (1964) ; This Honorable Court: History of the United States Supreme Court (1965) ; God, Caesar and the Constitution: Court as Referee of Church-State Confrontation (1975), and Religious Liberty (1977). Pro fessor Pfeffer has contributed portions to Religion in the State University, ed. Henry E. Allen (1950) ; Cultural Pluralism and the American Idea, ed. Horace M. Kallen (1956); Religion in America, ed. John Cogley (1958); Church-State Relations in Ecumenical Perspective, ed. Elwyn A. Smith (1966) ; Religious Situation (1968) ; Politics of Confrontation, ed. Samuel Hendel (1971) ; Rights of Americans, ed. Norman Dorsen (1971) ; and Responsibility, ed. Mereld D. Keys (1974) ; and Religious Movements in Contemporary America, ed. Irving I. Zaretsky and Mark P. Leone (1974). His articles have appeared in the law reviews of Boston, Buffalo, Chicago, Georgetown, Michigan, Notre Dame, Stanford, and Western Reserve universities and in such periodicals as Catholic World, Chiristian Century, Churchman, Commonweal, Current History, Journal of Intergroup Relations, Journal of Social Issues, Nation, Princeton Seminary Bulletin, Saturday Review, and Today's Education. JCS has published Pfeffer's Freedom and Separation : America's Contribution to Civilization (November 1960), An Analysis of Federal Aid to Parochial Schools (November 1961), The New York Regents' Prayer Case (November 1962), The Schempp-Murray Decision on School Prayers and Bible Reading (November 1963), A Momentous Year in Church and State: 1963 (Winter 1964), The Becker Amend ment (Autumn 1964), and What Hath God Wrought to Caesar: Church as a Self-interest Interest Group (Winter 1971). Mr. Pfeffer has argued the following cases before the United States Supreme Court: Torcaso v. Watkins (1961) ; Lanza v. New York (1962) ; Flast v. Cohen (1968) ; Earley v. DiCenso (1971) ; Tilton v. Richardson (1971) ; Diffenderfer v. Central Baptist Church of Miami (1972) ; Levitt v. Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty (1973) ; Nyquist v. Com mittee for Public Education and Religious Liberty (1973) ; Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist (1973) ; Wheeler v. Barrera (1974) ; and Meek v. Pittenger (1975). He has filed twenty-seven amicus curiae briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Pfeffer has been the recipient of awards from Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the Minnesota Jewish Community Council, the New York Unitarian-Universalist Church, the Brooklyn Civil Liberties Union, the Horace Mann League, and the Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty. This guest editorial was in its original form presented as a paper to the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion in Philadelphia 29 October 1976. 1. Leo Pfeffer, That Divide, Journal of Social Issues 7 (19S6) : 21.

Louis M. Kohlmeier, Jr. <italic>“God Save This Honorable Court!”</italic> New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. 1972. Pp. x, 309. $8.95

Journal Article Louis M. Kohlmeier, Jr. “God Save This Honorable Court!” New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. 1972. Pp. x, 309. $8.95 Get access Kohlmeier Louis M.Jr.“God Save This Honorable Court!”New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. 1972. Pp. x, 309. $8.95. J. Woodford Howard, Jr. J. Woodford Howard, Jr. Johns Hopkins University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The American Historical Review, Volume 79, Issue 4, October 1974, Pages 1294–1295, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/79.4.1294 Published: 01 October 1974

God Save This Honorable Court by Louis M. Kohlmeier, Jr

Book Review| October 01 1973 God Save This Honorable Court by Louis M. Kohlmeier, Jr God Save This Honorable Court. By Kohlmeier, Louis M.Jr. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1972. Pp. x, 309. $8.85. Gordon Morris Bakken Gordon Morris Bakken California State University, Fullerton Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google South Atlantic Quarterly (1973) 72 (4): 613. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-72-4-613 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Gordon Morris Bakken; God Save This Honorable Court by Louis M. Kohlmeier, Jr. South Atlantic Quarterly 1 October 1973; 72 (4): 613. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-72-4-613 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsSouth Atlantic Quarterly Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 1973 by Duke University Press1973 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

W sprawie deontologii pracownika naukowego

Every professional group in society gradually evolves its own set of rules of conduct, running along two lines, the technical and the moral, which together add up to constitute the particular ethics or deontology of that profession. This professional ethics is directly connected with the honour and dignity of the profession, and the person who breaks the rules imposed by the professional code disgraces the honour of his profession; to safeguard that honour, there are special corporational and disciplinary bodies known as the Courts of Honour.

This Honorable Court: A History of the Supreme Court of the United States

This Honorable Court: A History of the Supreme Court of the United States

This Honorable Court: A History of the United States Supreme Court

This Honorable Court: A History of the United States Supreme Court

This Honorable Court: A History of the United States Supreme Court

This Honorable Court: A History of the United States Supreme Court

The Honorable Court: A History of the United States Supreme Court

The Honorable Court: A History of the United States Supreme Court

Ethnic Affiliations and Judicial Propensities

Previous articleNext article No AccessEthnic Affiliations and Judicial PropensitiesStuart S. NagelStuart S. Nagel Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 24, Number 1Feb., 1962 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2126739 Views: 7Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1962 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:William Blake God Save This Honorable Court, Political Research Quarterly 65, no.44 (Dec 2012): 814–826.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911421015William Blake Assessing the Effect of Catholic Justices on Supreme Court Decisions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1643235Matthew S. Crow, Marc Gertz Sentencing policy and disparity: Guidelines and the influence of legal and democratic subcultures, Journal of Criminal Justice 36, no.44 (Aug 2008): 362–371.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.06.004Paresh Kumar Narayan, Russell Smyth What Explains Dissent on the High Court of Australia? An Empirical Assessment Using a Cointegration and Error Correction Approach, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4, no.22 (Jul 2007): 401–425.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00093.xRussell Smyth The role of attitudinal, institutional and environmental factors in explaining variations in the dissent rate on the High Court of Australia, Australian Journal of Political Science 40, no.44 (Dec 2005): 519–540.https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140500302480Anthony Champagne The Politics of Judicial Selection, Policy Studies Journal 31, no.33 (Aug 2003): 413–419.https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0072.00031CRAIG F. EMMERT, HENRY R. GLICK THE SELECTION OF STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, American Politics Quarterly 16, no.44 (Nov 2016): 445–465.https://doi.org/10.1177/004478088016004003Kermit L. Hall Progressive Reform and the Decline of Democratic Accountability: The Popular Election of State Supreme Court Judges, 1850-1920, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 9, no.22 (Nov 2018): 345–369.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1984.tb01050.xFrances Kahn Zemans Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System, American Political Science Review 77, no.33 (Aug 2014): 690–703.https://doi.org/10.2307/1957268James L. Gibson From simplicity to complexity: The development of theory in the study of judicial behavior, Political Behavior 5, no.11 (Jan 1983): 7–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989985Glendon Schubert Political Culture and Judicial Ideology, Comparative Political Studies 9, no.44 (Jan 1977): 363–408.https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407700900401 John W. Patterson and Gregory J. Rathjen Background Diversity & State Supreme Court Dissent Behavior, Polity 8, no.44 (Nov 2016): 610–622.https://doi.org/10.2307/3234294R. Clement Perspectives d'avenir pour les peintures en poudre, Progress in Organic Coatings 3, no.22 (Jun 1975): 141–176.https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9440(75)80005-1Margaret G. Hermann INDIRECT METHODS OF ASSESSING PERSONALITY1, ETS Research Bulletin Series 1968, no.11 (Aug 2014): i–75.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00995.x Kenneth N. Vines Federal District Judges and Race Relations Cases in the South, The Journal of Politics 26, no.22 (Sep 2015): 337–357.https://doi.org/10.2307/2127600Theodore L. Becker On Science, Political Science, and Law, American Behavioral Scientist 7, no.44 (Jul 2016): 11–15.https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426300700404 Some Recent Innovative Studies in the Law: An Annotated Bibliography, American Behavioral Scientist 7, no.44 (Jul 2016): 53–55.https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426300700413Glendon Schubert Behavioral Research In Public Law, American Political Science Review 57, no.0202 (Aug 2014): 433–445.https://doi.org/10.2307/1952834

Allied Forces (Polish Court of Honour) Case.

Jurisdiction — Miscellaneous — Jurisdiction over Allied Forces in Great Britain — The Allied Forces Act, 1940 — Jurisdiction of Officers’ Courts of Honour.

Courts of Honour

Courts of Honour

German Social Honor Courts

German Social Honor Courts

Breton, Elyot, and The Court of Honour

Breton, Elyot, and The Court of Honour

The Social Honor Courts of Nazi Germany

The Social Honor Courts of Nazi Germany

The Court of Honor to Civic Benefactors Denver, Colorado

The Court of Honor to Civic Benefactors Denver, Colorado

Project of charter of the Permanent Court of Honor at the All-Russian Society of Physicians in memory of N.I.Pirogov

The Board of the Society of Russian Doctors in memory of N.I. Pirogov asks you to print the attached statement on the draft charter of the permanent court of honor at the Pirogov Society: The X Pirogov Congress of Doctors instructed the Board and submit the developed project to the approval of the XI Pirogov Congress. " The commission, in which lawyers took part, has finished its work and is presenting this project to the attention of doctors, inviting them to express their views, both of a general nature about a permanent judgment of honor, and of individual articles of this project. All comments and reviews should be sent before October 1, 1908 to the Board of the Society of Russian Doctors in memory of N.I. Pirogov (Moscow, Arbat, Denezny lane, 28, apt. 5); according to these reviews, the project will be revised again by the commission and submitted for approval of the upcoming XI Pirogov Congress.

Letter to the editor

The Board of the Society of Russian Doctors in memory of N. I. Pirogov asks you to print the attached application with the draft charter of the permanent court of honor at the Pirogov Society.
 The 10th Pirogov Congress of Doctors instructed the Board to "elect a commission, in which to include also comrades at will, to develop the issue of courts of honor and submit the draft for approval by the 11th Pirogov Congress."

The World's Columbian Exposition—The Court of Honor

The World's Columbian Exposition—The Court of Honor