Ethnic Affiliations and Judicial Propensities

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessEthnic Affiliations and Judicial PropensitiesStuart S. NagelStuart S. Nagel Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 24, Number 1Feb., 1962 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2126739 Views: 7Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1962 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:William Blake God Save This Honorable Court, Political Research Quarterly 65, no.44 (Dec 2012): 814–826.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911421015William Blake Assessing the Effect of Catholic Justices on Supreme Court Decisions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1643235Matthew S. Crow, Marc Gertz Sentencing policy and disparity: Guidelines and the influence of legal and democratic subcultures, Journal of Criminal Justice 36, no.44 (Aug 2008): 362–371.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.06.004Paresh Kumar Narayan, Russell Smyth What Explains Dissent on the High Court of Australia? An Empirical Assessment Using a Cointegration and Error Correction Approach, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4, no.22 (Jul 2007): 401–425.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00093.xRussell Smyth The role of attitudinal, institutional and environmental factors in explaining variations in the dissent rate on the High Court of Australia, Australian Journal of Political Science 40, no.44 (Dec 2005): 519–540.https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140500302480Anthony Champagne The Politics of Judicial Selection, Policy Studies Journal 31, no.33 (Aug 2003): 413–419.https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0072.00031CRAIG F. EMMERT, HENRY R. GLICK THE SELECTION OF STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, American Politics Quarterly 16, no.44 (Nov 2016): 445–465.https://doi.org/10.1177/004478088016004003Kermit L. Hall Progressive Reform and the Decline of Democratic Accountability: The Popular Election of State Supreme Court Judges, 1850-1920, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 9, no.22 (Nov 2018): 345–369.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1984.tb01050.xFrances Kahn Zemans Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System, American Political Science Review 77, no.33 (Aug 2014): 690–703.https://doi.org/10.2307/1957268James L. Gibson From simplicity to complexity: The development of theory in the study of judicial behavior, Political Behavior 5, no.11 (Jan 1983): 7–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989985Glendon Schubert Political Culture and Judicial Ideology, Comparative Political Studies 9, no.44 (Jan 1977): 363–408.https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407700900401 John W. Patterson and Gregory J. Rathjen Background Diversity & State Supreme Court Dissent Behavior, Polity 8, no.44 (Nov 2016): 610–622.https://doi.org/10.2307/3234294R. Clement Perspectives d'avenir pour les peintures en poudre, Progress in Organic Coatings 3, no.22 (Jun 1975): 141–176.https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9440(75)80005-1Margaret G. Hermann INDIRECT METHODS OF ASSESSING PERSONALITY1, ETS Research Bulletin Series 1968, no.11 (Aug 2014): i–75.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00995.x Kenneth N. Vines Federal District Judges and Race Relations Cases in the South, The Journal of Politics 26, no.22 (Sep 2015): 337–357.https://doi.org/10.2307/2127600Theodore L. Becker On Science, Political Science, and Law, American Behavioral Scientist 7, no.44 (Jul 2016): 11–15.https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426300700404 Some Recent Innovative Studies in the Law: An Annotated Bibliography, American Behavioral Scientist 7, no.44 (Jul 2016): 53–55.https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426300700413Glendon Schubert Behavioral Research In Public Law, American Political Science Review 57, no.0202 (Aug 2014): 433–445.https://doi.org/10.2307/1952834