The aryl-substituted N-picolylethylenediamine and diethylenetriamine ligands, (ArNHCH(2)CH(2))[(2-C(5)H(4)N)CH(2)]NH and (ArNHCH(2)CH(2))(2)NH (Ar = 2,6-Me(2)C(6)H(3), 2,4,6-Me(3)C(6)H(2)), have been prepared by employing palladium-catalysed N-C(aryl) coupling reactions of the corresponding primary amines with aryl bromide. Treatment of MCl(2) with (ArNHCH(2)CH(2))[(2-C(5)H(4)N)CH(2)]NH affords [[(ArNHCH(2)CH(2))((2-C(5)H(4)N)CH(2))NH]CoCl(2)](Ar = 2,6-Me(2)C(6)H(3) 1a; 2,4,6-Me(3)C(6)H(2)) 1b and [[(ArNHCH(2)CH(2))((2-C(5)H(4)N)CH(2))NH]FeCl(2)](n)(n= 1, Ar = 2,6-Me(2)C(6)H(3) 2a; n= 2, 2,4,6-Me(3)C(6)H(2) 2b) in high yield. The X-ray structures of 1a and 1b are isostructural and reveal the metal centres to adopt distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometries with the N,N,N-chelates adopting fac-structures. A facial coordination mode of the ligand is also observed in bimetallic 2b, however, in 2a the N,N,N-chelate adopts a mer-configuration with the metal centre adopting a geometry best described as square pyramidal. Solution studies indicate that mer-fac isomerisation is a facile process for these systems at room temperature. Quantum mechanical calculations (DFT) have been performed on 1a and 2a, in which the ligands employed are identical, and show the fac- to be marginally more stable than the mer-configuration for cobalt (1a) while for iron (2a) the converse is evident. Reaction of (ArNHCH(2)CH(2))(2)NH with CoCl(2) gave the five-coordinate complexes [[(ArNHCH(2)CH(2))(2)NH]CoCl(2)](Ar = 2,6-Me(2)C(6)H(3) 3a, 2,4,6-Me(3)C(6)H(2) 3b), in which the ligand adopts a mer-configuration; no reaction occurred with FeCl(2). All complexes 1-3 act as modest ethylene oligomerisation catalysts on activation with excess methylaluminoxane (MAO); the iron systems giving linear alpha-olefins while the cobalt systems give mixtures of linear and branched products.
Read full abstract