Charging station sharing, as a new business model, can effectively reduce the building of unnecessary public charging stations and promote sustainable urban development. This study discusses whether the manufacturers introduce a charging station sharing strategy and identify the introduction conditions. We develop a strategic competition model where the two manufacturers engage in electric vehicles (EVs) and charging stations. The results show that charging stations have a facilitating effect on the EV market. In a sharing strategy, the low-end vehicle manufacturer can profit more when the contract cost is smaller. Comparing the strategies of self-building and sharing, the manufacturers should choose a self-building strategy when the cost coefficient of building the station, the brand advantage, and the contract cost are all larger. However, when the brand advantage and the contract cost are smaller, or both in the medium, the manufacturers should choose a sharing strategy. In addition, we also find that the substitutability of EVs and the cross-sensitivity of EVs and charging stations can lead to lower market demand for EVs. In a monopoly production scenario, encroachment by both the platform and the service provider leads to lower profits for the manufacturer. Therefore, it is more favorable for the manufacturer to self-build charging stations in the no-invader condition. Our analysis provides insights into when charging station sharing may be beneficial and when it may be detrimental to vehicle manufacturers.