Corruption Court Research Articles

Non-Penal Efforts in Overcoming Crime of Corruption by Building an Anti-corruption Culture for "Didikan Subuh" Participants in Padang

<p>This study examines the concept of integration of Anti-Corruption Education at "Subuh" Education Program in Padang City. Corruption is an extraordinary crime or extraordinary crime, so it needs extraordinary handling as well. Viewed from the organic theory, the handling of criminal acts of corruption is equipped with a complete structure. Judging from the substance of the law, it has been widely supported by complete laws and regulations. From the aspect of legal culture, several policies have been issued that integrate Anti-Corruption Education into the learning curriculum in schools. However, these efforts have not yielded significant results. The rate of corruption is still said to be high. In Padang City, an average of 39 cases are submitted to the Corruption Court, Padang District Court. The approach that needs to be taken is a religious approach. The Islamic religious approach is carried out by integrating Anti-Corruption Education in the "Subuh" Education Program. "Didikan Subuh" is an Islamic Education Program that was born and developed in Minangkabau. Subuh Education is a functional and practical conception of Islamic Education at dawn with activities centered in the Mosque and Mushalla. Researchers used the Legal System Theory from Laurence M. Friedman and the Functional Structure Theory from Talcott Parsons. This research is normative legal research. The data source consists of secondary data. Data were analyzed qualitatively.</p>

Ratio Legis of Legal Differences between Ad Hoc and Career Judges in Indonesian Corruption Courts

Corruption is a severe problem for every country in the world. This is related to the modus operandi and the impact of corruption that can destroy the economic order of a country. Realizing the consequences of corruption, we need extraordinary treatment in coping with corruption, one of which is by establishing an anti-corruption agency. This provision is adopted in Indonesian law in Law No. 46 of 2009 concerning the Corruption Court which was established based on the provisions of Article 35 of Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and based on the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 012-016-019/PUU-IV/2006 dated December 19, 2006. However, in the provisions of Article 1 and Article 10 of Law No. 46 of 2009 concerning the Court of Criminal Acts of Corruption, a provision distinguishes the legal position between ad hoc judges and career judges, which limits the principle of independence of judicial power, especially for ad hoc judges. This legal research used normative juridical approach. The data used were primary and secondary data which were analyzed using quantitative method. It was found that, first, the Corruption Court was established because of public distrust of the general court which examines and decides on corruption cases, low verdicts, non-transparent handling, and low integrity of legal apparatus; second, the meaning of ad hoc deviates to a particular purpose, instead of temporary or impermanent as its juridical interpretation.

ARRANGEMENTS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT INVOLVING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN BRIBERY

There are still a number of individuals and government bodies in Indonesia that have the capacity to abuse the power that they possess. In government entities, it is possible for KPK investigators to abuse their positions of power. Since the investigators have to make direct contact with the crime or the suspect, it is possible that they will accept bribes or gifts. This study aims to investigate the types of crimes that may be committed by KPK investigators when handling corruption cases, the criminal liability of law enforcement based on the Criminal Acts of Corruption Act, and the efforts made by the government to address the issue of criminal acts of corruption. This article employs qualitative analysis, which entails a detailed description of the processed data in the form of phrases, as the technique of data analysis used in this research (descriptive). In terms of Indonesian criminal law, corruption is governed by Law No. 31 of 1999 and Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. These rules establish the extent of the punishment for corruption offenders, which includes imprisonment, fines, and the death penalty. In addition, the government aims to seize the profits of illegal acts of corruption via asset recovery through enforcing the Law on the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering. Regarding law enforcement, the government created the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Corruption Court.

The Quality of Investigation Audit Influenced by Independence and Integrity

Quality audits are important not only for investigators but also for auditors when advancing as experts in court. Therefore, the formation of MIA to handle investigative examinations is BPK's answer to the phenomena that occur in society related to the quality of the results of BPK investigations. However, even after the formation of MIA, there were still complaints from the public regarding the quality of the results of investigative examinations. BPK received a lot of attention because of actions that were not in accordance with the BPK auditors' code of ethics, namely integrity violations that resulted in arrest by law enforcers and undergoing trial at the Corruption Court. For this reason, auditors must always maintain an attitude of mental independence, in all matters relating to the provision of audit services, to improve audit quality. This study aims to analyze how independence and integrity can increase the quality of investigation audit. This study involved 267 investigators of Law Enforcement Agencies as respondents using a questionnaire. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis and SEM techniques. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that independence and integrity have a significant positive effect on the quality of investigation audit.

Legal Reconstruction of Corruption Act in Indonesia to Realize a Just Law Enforcement

The main problem studied in this research is what are the weaknesses in the Enforcement of Corruption Act in Indonesia and how the legal construction based on justice value using a constructivism paradigm with a sociological juridical approach to solve research problems by examining secondary data and primary data by finding the legal reality experienced in the field as well as qualitative descriptive methods, namely where the data obtained are then arranged systematically so that a comprehensive picture will be obtained, where later the data will be presented descriptively. The Result Shows that The weaknesses of criminal justice regulations against corruption in the Indonesian legal system consist of the Substance Factors of the Supreme Court Law No. 1 of 2020 only limit the scope of application of Article 2 and Article 3 of the Law, The Legal Structure Factor, namely the composition of the Corruption Court judges, which consists of career judges and ad hoc judges, often does not focus on handling corruption cases because there are career judges who also handle other cases, And then The legal culture factor, that is the attitude of the people who regard corruption cases as a thing of the past and ignorant, the strong culture of reluctance. In order to tackle this, It is necessary to reconstruct the criminal justice regulations against corruption in order to realize fair law enforcement, namely through the establishment of a new permanent expansion of PERMA No. 1 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for the Criminalization of Article 2 and Article 3 of the Corruption Law in order to better reach other articles of corruption and reconstruct Article 10 paragraph (5) of Law No. 46 of 2009 concerning the Corruption Act Court to "The term of office of ad hoc judges is for a period of 5 (five) years and is proposed to be reappointed every 5 (five) years by the Supreme Court".

Implementasi Pelaksanaan Ketentuan Pasal 35 UU No.46 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bertentangan Dengan Harapan Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Ringan Terhadap Peradilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Tingkat Kabupaten/Kota

Abstract :The focus of the study in this research is the implementation of the provisions of Article 35 of Law No. 46 of 2009 concerning Corruption Courts Contrary to the Expectations of Fast, Simple and Low Cost Judicial Principles for Corruption Courts at the Regency/City Level. This study aims to examine and analyze the subject matter, namely analyzing the problems of implementing the provisions of Article 35 of Law Number 46 Year 2009 concerning the court of corruption at the district/city level. To analyze the policy concept so that the judicial process for corruption at the district/city level can reflect the expectations of the principles of simple, fast and low-cost justice. To discuss these problems, the type of research used by the author is that this research is structured as "normative" research, namely research that is used to examine various positive legal provisions and general legal principles, in order to obtain scientific truth on the discussion of legal issues being studied. . Based on the results of the research, the implementation of the establishment of the criminal justice system for corruption in each district was not in accordance with what was expected. This means that what is expected with the reality that occurs does not match. Because until now the implementation of article 52 paragraph (2) has not materialized. The impact is that there are difficulties in the process of handling cases that must be resolved by the Corruption Crime Court and the increasing number and accumulation of cases, in addition to the long distance constraints from the corruption courts, a small budget, an average staff of only 2 public prosecutors. so that the settlement of corruption cases that are carried out becomes slow, this is certainly not in accordance with the principles of fast, simple and low-cost justice.

Analisis Yuridis Proses Peradilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Palembang

The Corruption Court in the Class IA Palembang District Court in examining corruption cases uses the procedural law used in examinations at the corruption court, namely Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, equipped with certain articles. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with a literature approach. The results of the study state that there are obstacles faced by the Class IA Palembang District Court in resolving the Corruption Crime, namely obstacles that arise from the law itself, in addition to constraints from Law Enforcement Officials, constraints on facilities or facilities, constraints on community environmental factors, and constraints arising from the perpetrator himself.

The Futuristic Concept of Abuse of Authority in Criminal Acts of Corruption

As a concept, the term "abuse of authority" is used by 2 (two) legal regimes, namely by the administrative law regime and by the criminal law regime of corruption, both legal regimes are public law. The impact of using the concept of abuse of authority by 2 (two) different legal regimes on the same concept/term in case of abuse of authority is the birth of concurrent jurisdiction between the State Administrative Court and the Corruption Court. Concurrent jurisdiction over the same material by 2 different judicial institutions. After the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, especially Article 21 according to the author's observation, there have never been cases of corruption cases filed by the special Public Prosecutor concerning the indictment of Article 3 of Law 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Laws -Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption has been tested beforehand regarding whether or not there is an element of abuse of authority by the State Administrative Court. This situation shows that the application of laws and regulations is faced with two things, namely "performance" (validity) and usability (efficacy). While usability is related to whether the norm is adhered to or not.

Money laundering in corruption cases in Indonesia

PurposeIn the case of money laundering (ML) originating from the predicate crime of corruption, law enforcers find it difficult to prove all or the existence of a predicate crime on assets that produce assets. This paper aims to analyze ML in corruption cases in Indonesia.Design/methodology/approachThis research uses qualitative descriptive methods. This research discusses the law enforcement of corruption which coincides with the crime of ML.FindingsNew findings were discovered where against the corruption case which was carried out concurrently with the crime of money laundering, the value of which was Rp. 1bn and above and has been handled by investigators from the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), so the prosecution process is carried out by the public prosecutor from the KPK to continue the trial to the Corruption Court. With respect to cases of criminal acts of corruption, which were carried out concurrently with ML crimes, the value of which was Rp. 1bn and below and had been handled by the prosecutor’s investigators from the start, the prosecution process was carried out by the public prosecutor from the prosecutor’s office to continue the trial to the corruption court.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to use normative perspective on ML in corruption cases (white-collar crime). In contrast to previous studies that take fraud in general as an object of research, researchers are now interested in focusing more research on detecting suspected ML crimes: a case study on corruption cases in Indonesia.

Broaden The Authority of The Corruption Criminal Act Courts in Order to Eradicate Corruption, Colusion and Nepotism

Seriousness in eradicating KKN as a whole and not only focusing on eradicating corruption alone is in line with the regulations regarding collusion and nepotism in the Law on the Implementation of Clean and KKN-free Government. In the legislation, collusion and nepotism are formulated as criminal acts whose perpetrators are threatened with criminal sanctions. This means that collusion and nepotism are actions that are prohibited by the law. Indonesia has a Special Court to hear corruption cases, but these courts do not have the authority to try criminal acts of collusion and nepotism. The formulation of the problem raised in this paper is 1) What is the urgency of determining the court that is authorized to adjudicate criminal acts of collusion and nepotism? 2) What is the legal policy that should be related to the authority to adjudicate criminal acts of collusion and nepotism? The research method used `is normative legal research. The results of the study indicate that although juridically, the crime of collusion and nepotism should be tried in the general court, in this case the district court, in practice, the crime of nepotism has been tried and decided at the Corruption Court at the Class IA Bengkulu District Court in Decision Number 61/Pid. Sus-TPK/2016/PN.Bg. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify what court is authorized to adjudicate criminal acts of collusion and nepotism. The legal policy that related to the authority to adjudicate criminal acts of collusion and nepotism should be to expand as a step to strengthen the comprehensive eradication of KKN, if these steps are not taken, it is important to revoke the provisions for criminal acts of collusion and nepotism contained in the Law on the Implementation of Clean and KKN-free Government to ensure legal certainty .

Implementation of the Principle of Equality Before The Law in Corruption Court Decisions

Equality before the law is a basic principle in positive law in Indonesia which is called the Principle of Equality Before The Law, this aims to protect the human rights of citizens and to fight discrimination and the arbitrariness of rulers, but in practice, there are still many constitutions that have not been carrying out these basic principles, especially in acts of corruption as occurred in the corruption case in the procurement of 1,800 computer units for the 2018 computer-based National Examination worth Rp. This case clearly shows that the law in Indonesia tends to side with the authorities so a stigma arises in society that the law in Indonesia is blunt up and down. Of course, this phenomenon has reduced public trust in the government, especially in law enforcement

Conflict of Law Enforcement by State Institutions over Abuse of Power and Authority: A Case Study of "Former President Director of PT. Pertamina"

This study, wants to analyze the very significant differences in the application of legal considerations on the abuse of power and authority by the former President Director of PT. Pertamina, which caused losses to the state based on legal considerations by the Corruption Court Judge and the Jakarta High Court, decided to imprisonment for 8 years and a fine. However, a cassation decision by the Panel of Judges at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia stated that the defendant was presumed innocent and freed the defendant from the demands of imprisonment and unconditional release. The problem of this research is, Why are there very significant differences in the application of law in the same state institution? The purpose of this study, for Constitutional Law academics can provide a very significant difference study in legal considerations in the Court of Justice in Indonesia. For judges at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia as an introspection in the legal consideration of abuse of power that results in losses to the state. This research approach method was a qualitative method. Creswell defines a qualitative method as a research method that is based on the perspective of constructivism, in which various meanings are socially and historically constructed with a view to develop a theory or pattern. The researcher analysis was based on legal regulations where conflicts occurred in the law enforcement among the three state institutions acting as the basis of constitutional law, which were; Jakarta Corruption Court; High Court of Appeals for the Special Capital Region of Jakarta; and Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.The results of the research show real evidence, the application of law, abuse of power and authority in state-owned enterprises, which was carried out by the former President Director of PT Pertamina so that the state suffered losses. At the Corruption Crime Court and the Jakarta High Court apply the Corruption Crime Law, but the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia applies business law. In terms of this significant difference, it has resulted in constitutional law academics assessing decisions that do not reflect a sense of justice. The researcher's suggestion is that the panel of judges in a state institution should have no differences in taking legal considerations on abuse of power and authority that harm the state.

Judicial Specialisation Through the Prism of the Principle of a “Natural Court”: A Comparative Analysis

Background: In the current conditions of the intensive development of public relations and the complication of their legal regulation, more and more states are turning to the specialisation of the judiciary and judicial exercise. Thus, in Ukraine, it is established at the constitutional level that the judicial system in Ukraine is built on the principles of territoriality and specialisation, and higher specialised courts may operate in accordance with the law. In addition, the Constitution of Ukraine states that the establishment of extraordinary and special courts is not allowed. Art. 31 of the Law of Ukraine ‘On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges’ (2016) states that in the judicial system, there are higher specialised courts, such as courts of first instance for certain categories of cases. This category of court now includes the High Court of Intellectual Property and the High Anti-Corruption Court. However, there has been a heated debate in Ukrainian political circles about the constitutionality of the anti-corruption court, and accordingly, the subject of the constitutional petition questioned the number of provisions of the Law on the High Anti-Corruption Court and appealed to the Constitutional Court to declare the law unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine has initiated constitutional proceedings on this issue. Acquaintance with the legal position of the subject of the constitutional petition indicates that the key issue of this constitutional proceeding concerns the presence of signs of a ‘special court’ (within the meaning of Part 6 of Art. 125 of the Constitution of Ukraine) in the mechanism of legislative regulation of the High Anti- Corruption Court. Methods: To find an objective answer to the existing conflict, it was necessary to clarify the legal nature of judicial specialisation and identify key features of the ‘special court’. To solve this problem, the authors turned to the theoretical and applied provisions of the principle of a natural court, which became the basis of the subject of this work. Results and Conclusions: In conclusion, this article argues for the idea of the unity and integrity of the judiciary. Common goals and tasks are assigned to the courts, regardless of their place in the judiciary and jurisdictional specialisation. Therefore, courts that are endowed with special goals and objectives, different from those of general courts, were assessed as special courts.

Akibat Hukum Dissenting Opinion terhadap Putusan Pengadilan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi

The corruption court which was shaped dependent on Law No. 46 of 2009, practically speaking has applied numerous choices chosen by leading Disagreeing Assessment, this alludes to the situation of the Debasement Court as an uncommon court actually dependent upon the Legal Force Act which permits Contradicting Assessment, or for judges who have various conclusions can contain his viewpoint in the choice was the substance of the choice looking into it of a criminal demonstration of defilement. The issues talked about in this paper is: What is the lawful impact of disagreeing assessment on court choices in instances of defilement? This examination is a legitimate exploration with standardizing juridical methodology as the primary methodology in investigating lawful material. In view of the consequences of the examination and conversation, the accompanying ends can be drawn: 1). Because of the utilization of the contradicting assessment to the Adjudicators' choice since the authorization of Law Number 4 of 2004 concerning Legal Force, there is a show among individuals from a board of judges where if in a pondering meeting the board of judges isn't arrived at agreement, the assessment of a minority judge not the same as the consequence of a legal gathering should be remembered for the choice and is a section which is indivisible from the choice. Contradicting feelings can likewise be utilized as thought for decided at the allure and cassation level.

REKONSTRUKSI PEMBERI GRATIFIKASI SEBAGAI SUBYEK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

Gratification has not yet been regulated by laws and regulations as a criminal act. This happened in the Samin Tan case, where the judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court released Samin Tan from granting a gratuity of IDR 5 billion to Eni Maulani Saragih as a member of Commission VII DPR for the 2014-2019 period. The current formulation of policies regarding gratification in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Corruption requires restructuring, especially in the substance of the meaning of gratification, reporting on receipt of gratification to the KPK, criminal sanctions, and qualifications of the giver and recipient of gratification. so that the optimization of the application and enforcement of appropriate laws is achieved, namely certainty and justice. Reconstruction of the gratification provider for corruption must be based on a low level of gratification and bribery according to its definition. Bribery has the definition of a relationship due to the consequences of actions that result in or influence a person in his position as a state administrator to the interests of the bribe giver. While gratification should only be a gift, without having to be associated with any reciprocal actions. With a clear distinction between bribery and pure gratification that does not lead to bribery, the weight of the punishment is determined. Likewise, the gratuity giver, if it is said to be a bribe, must explain how much punishment was given to him. For example, the giver of gratuities as referred to in Article 12 B of Law no. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes is the same as receiving gratuities. Thus the effect can be felt in a balanced way because it destroys requests and requests for prohibited acts.

Role Of Public Prosecutors In Corruption Crime Prosecution

The aims of this study are as follows: To identify and analyze the role of the Public Prosecutor in prosecuting defendants for corruption. To find out and analyze the efforts that will be made by the Public Prosecutor if the decision handed down by the Judge of the Corruption Court is not in accordance with the demands of the Public Prosecutor. The approach method used in this study is a sociological juridical research method. The specifications in this study are analytical descriptive. Based on the results of this study, the role of the Public Prosecutor in Prosecuting Defendants of Criminal Acts of Corruption, namely the public prosecutor in carrying out prosecutions for criminal acts of corruption has been sufficient to prove the fulfillment of the elements of criminal acts of corruption that were violated by the defendant as a result of the actions committed. Starting from the investigation, prosecution, legal action which then if it already has permanent legal force, the prosecutor's office as in making charges against criminal acts of corruption is regulated in Article 137, Article 139 and Article 143 of the Criminal Procedure Code as well as Act No. 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Indonesia, thus giving confidence to the judge that the defendant's actions had violated the criminal provisions he was charged. Examination of the Cassation Level for Legal Interests (Article 259 of the Criminal Procedure Code). Review of Court Decisions that have Permanent Legal Force (Article 263 of the Criminal Procedure Code).

Guarantee for the Protection of Human Rights Against Witnesses Criminal Reporters of Corruption According to the Laws of Witnesses and Victims

The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. Implementation of the protection process for reporting witnesses in the corruption court based on Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 2014 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims, the process mechanism hasn’t been regulated in detail and completely in practice, it cannot be done optimally.

Corporate Responsibility in Corruption Crimes at PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government Company) (Analysis of Sentence Number 30/Pid.Sus/Tpk/ 2020/PN.Jkt.Pst)

A corporation is an entity or legal subject whose existence makes a major contribution in increasing economic growth and national development, but in reality, corporations sometimes also commit various criminal acts (corporate crimes) that have a detrimental impact on the state and society. A corporation can be considered to have committed a crime based on the actions of a person who controls the management of the corporation. PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Company) as a state-owned company in recent years has been in the spotlight. PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) is unable to fulfill its customer's maturity policy obligations of around Rp 12.4 trillion. The default of PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) actually occurred in one of its flagship products, the JS Saving plan. JS Saving plan is a life insurance product as well as an investment offered through banking or bancassurance. In contrast to unit-linked insurance products where the investment risk is borne by the policyholder, the JS Saving plan is a non-unit-linked investment whose risks are fully borne by the insurance company. The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of corporate responsibility in the case of PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) and to determine the optimization of corporate responsibility for the perpetrators of corruption at PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) in returning losses to the state and customers (the public). The type of research used in writing this thesis is a normative legal research type. The results obtained are that in the corruption case that occurred at PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) there were several perpetrators who were charged, one of which was Heru Hidayat who is the main commissioner of PT Trada Alam Minera who also manages and controls corporations involved in criminal acts. Corruption Deviations in Financial Management and Investment Funds by PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company). Heru Hidayat as one of the main actors in the corruption case has now been sentenced to life imprisonment plus a replacement money of Rp 10.73 trillion. Meanwhile, the corporations that have been accused are 13 Investment Manager Companies which have been transferred to the Corruption Court at the Central Jakarta District Court and are currently in the trial process.

THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR ADDRESSING CORRUPTION CRIME IN THE FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORTING NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

The urgency for criminal justice system reconstruction of the corruption is given the legal gap in eradicating corruption law if it is only carried out by the Regional Corruption Court, which is domiciled in the Capital Province. Because the Corruption Court’s working area is so broad, it is because many corruption cases to be tried, it will also require large fees and a large number of judges, and ideally, it will take a long time in the process of examining. Meanwhile, on the other hand, there is an obligation for the corruption case settlement by the Corruption Court to be carried out quickly, simply and at low cost. This paper’s problems are: (a) Why is it important to reconstruct the Corruption Criminal Justice System? (b) What is the ideal construction of the Corruption Criminal Justice System to support national development in Indonesia? The research method is qualitative with juridical normative and sociological approaches, especially in collecting primary data to reconstruct the corruption criminal justice system. This research shows that the ideal construction of the corruption court system is to support National Development, namely the relative competence of the Regional Corruption Court, which is not limited by the administrative area of a province. The Republic of Indonesia’s administrative area consists of various Provinces and Regencies/Cities. In these conditions, ideally, the relative competence of a Corruption Court can also examine corruption cases in districts/cities close to the Corruption Court, even though they are located in a different province from the domicile of a Corruption Court.

JUDGMENT FREEDOM MODEL IN JUDGING CORRUPTION CRIMINAL CASES

The independence of judges is based on independence, therefore it is guaranteed in law. Judges adjudicating corruption cases must be professional, clean, honest, courageous and free from intra-judicial and extra-judicial influences. The problem in this research is how the model of freedom of judges in judging cases of corrup-tion in the Corruption Court, especially in the Corruption Court at the Kls I A District Court in Bandung. This research was carried out with a normative and empirical juridical approach, namely studying legal materials systematically to discuss problems obtained from literature studies, by analyzing a legal problem through the concept of legal philosophy associated with the freedom of Judgment in adjudicating corruption cases and The data obtained were ob-tained from field research and interviews. The purpose of this research is to examine the model of Judgment freedom in examining, adjudicating and deciding cases of Corruption Crime, while the benefits of this research are expected to produce scientific work that is beneficial for the development of legal science as well as material for scientific work that will be published in the National Journal., as well as teaching material for students of the Faculty of Law in particular who take courses in Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Law and Legal Philosophy. From this research, it is found that judges in deciding cases of corruption can apply existential freedom and social freedom to produce a just decision based on the one and only Godhead.