Purpose: Air gas aesthesiometry overcomes some of the limitations of the ‘gold standard’, CochetBonnet aesthesiometer. However, for truemechanical corneal sensitivitymeasurement, the airflow stimulus temperature of the aesthesiometer must equal corneal temperature at the corneal surface, to avoid additional response from temperature-sensitive nerves. The aim of this study was to record corneal surface temperature changes during the presentation of the air-stimulus with varying temperatures and pressures. Method: (a) Corneal surface temperaturewas recordedwith aid of an infrared camera (FLIR A310) on a total of 14 subjects (mean age 25.14±2.18 years; seven females) during the presentation of heated airflow stimuli at three temperatures: room temperature +10◦, +15◦ and +20 ◦C (duration 3s; 4mmdistance of exit-nozzle to cornea; airflow 60ml/min; room temperature 23-24 ◦C). (b) Subsequently, corneal temperaturemeasurements were repeated whilst varying the airflow rates and restricting the stimulus temperature to that which matched corneal temperature found in (a). Inclusion criteria were age<40, no contact lens wear, absence of ocular disease including dry eye, and no use of artificial tears. Repeated measures (ANOVA) and appropriate post hoc t-tests were applied. Results: A stimulus temperature of +15 ◦C induced the least change in corneal temperature. Consequently, corneal temperature changes were recorded when applying air stimuli of +15 ◦C with airflow rates of 30, 60, 80 and 100ml/min. Mean corneal temperature change was found to be: 0.00±0.07 ◦C with 30ml/min (p=1.000), +0.18±0.17 ◦C with 60ml/min (p=0.002), +0.32±0.13 ◦Cwith 80ml/min (p=0.000), and +0.43±0.10 ◦Cwith 100ml/min (p=0.000). Conclusions: Although stimulus temperature was set to produce no temperature change on the corneal surface, the need to vary stimulus-airflow to change stimulus intensity, produced a small, but statistically significant effect on corneal surface temperature. Consequently, this air stimulus may not be exclusively ‘mechanical’, exciting only Afibres sensitive to deformation, but may also have an additional response from the temperaturesensitive C fibres.
Read full abstract