Circadian rhythms are cellular oscillations that tune an organism's biology to the 24‐hour light/dark cycle on Earth. This cellular time‐keeping mechanism aids in the anticipation of environmental changes and increases organismal survival. These rhythms are maintained by a transcriptional/translational negative feedback loop, called the core circadian clock, that is evolutionarily conserved throughout most branches of life. In this core clock, positive arm proteins act to transcriptionally activate negative arm proteins. The negative arms proteins act back on the positive arm, in a time specific manner, to halt the negative arm's activation before degradation and re‐initiation, thus setting the period of the clock. Beyond this core clock, positive arm proteins also act to transcriptionally activate a variety of other genes that do not participate in the core clock mechanism in a time dependent manor, referred to as clock‐controlled genes (ccgs.) Most research into the mechanisms of circadian regulation on output has focused on transcriptional activation by the positive arm proteins. However, recently published work has demonstrated that there are many oscillating proteins for which the corresponding mRNA is not rhythmic. This has led to the theory that the regulation of circadian output is also accomplished via post‐translational mechanisms, which we hypothesize are imparted by the negative arm proteins.In the model organism Neurospora crassa, the negative arm comprises FREQUENCY (FRQ), Frequency‐Interacting RNA Helicase (FRH), and Casein Kinase 1 (CK‐1). Importantly, FRQ has been computationally and experimentally proven to be an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP). Aside from lacking a single, predetermined three‐dimensional structure, IDPs play key roles in cellular signaling and regulation due, in part, to the transient but highly specific and varied interacting partners they have. These attributes make FRQ a prime candidate to impart post‐translational circadian regulation. The aim of this study is to characterize protein complexes, centered around FRQ, that change in a time specific manner, to determine the impact these interactions could impart post‐translationally on circadian regulatory pathways. To this end, Neurospora samples where crosslinked and purified through co‐immunoprecipitation before protein identification through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Initial results suggest that FRQ plays a role in post‐translational regulation on metabolism, the cell cycle, and a variety of other functions.Support or Funding InformationThis work was funded through the support of the NIGMS/NIH R35GM128687 grant and the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institue Start Up Fund.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.
Read full abstract