The article is devoted to the definition and characteristics of the peculiarities of the use of home and remote forms of labor during the legal regime of martial law. Each of them provides a number of significant advantages that are of great value in modern conditions and really contribute to the satisfaction of the urgent economic interests of society. The implementation of such forms on a large scale will have a positive effect on the economic security component. The importance of maximum use of the potential of labor legislation in matters of population employment is emphasized. Emphasis is placed on the need to find a balance between the physical ability to perform work functions and avoiding most of the consequences of a full-scale invasion. Based on this, attention has been focused on the need to actively use home and remote forms of activity in view of the economic exhaustion of the country and the need to satisfy the personal needs of citizens, including the maintenance of close relatives, family members and other persons. Considered, analyzed and compared home-based and remote forms of labor through the prism of national legislation. Attention is focused on their
 key aspects (place of work, wages, rest time, scope of labor rights of employees, belonging to equipment, materials or other resources necessary for the performance of the relevant activity, etc.). The legislation regulating the use of home and remote forms of labor activity during the legal regime of martial law is analyzed. The advantages and disadvantages of the remote form of work organization are highlighted. It was concluded that the peculiarities of home and remote work mainly relate to the place of work, the term and form of the employment contract, as well as the distribution of working time. There was also a transformation of the legal regulation of working hours and rest of employees, including changes in the establishment of the starting and ending hours of work, an increase in the duration of working hours.