In order to avoid combinatorial rule explosion in fuzzy reasoning, in this paper, we explore the distributive equations of implications. In detail, by means of the sections of <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$I$ </tex></formula> , we give out the sufficient and necessary conditions of solutions for the distributive equation of implication <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$I(x,T_1(y,z))=T_2(I(x,y),I(x,z))$</tex></formula> , when <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$T_1$</tex></formula> is a continuous but not Archimedean triangular norm, <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$T_2$</tex></formula> is a continuous and Archimedean triangular norm, and <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$I$</tex></formula> is an unknown function. This obtained characterizations indicate that there are no continuous solutions for the previous functional equation, satisfying the boundary conditions of implications. However, under the assumptions that <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$I$</tex></formula> is continuous except for the point (0,0), we get its complete characterizations. Here, it should be pointed out that these results make differences with recent results that are obtained by Baczyński and Qin. Moreover, our method can still apply to the three other functional equations that are related closely to the distributive equation of implication.