Four dynamical techniques for measuring the aerodynamic size of spherical and non-spherical aerosol particles are evaluated and compared. For spheres the classical method of angular light scattering is also included. One method based on particle dynamics, the so-called springpoint method, has been extensively used, but the other particle oscillation methods have been used rarely or not at all. All the dynamical methods involve imbalancing a particle in an electrodynamic balance (EDB) by changing the dc potential to produce particle oscillation. A linescan CCD camera and associated electronics were used to measure the amplitude of the oscillations, the offset of oscillation centers, and the phase lag relative to the ac drive. These measurements are compared with theoretical solutions of the equation of particle motion to establish the aerodynamic size of the particle. The stability characteristics of the particle are analyzed by solving the particle equation of motion using the method of continued fractions. The various techniques are compared for spheres, spheroids and crystalline or amorphous particles of irregular shape. All five methods are shown to be in good agreement for spheres (within 3.9%). For non-spherical germanium dioxide particles the three oscillation methods agree with the springpoint method within 3.4%.