You have accessJournal of UrologyPediatrics: Reconstructive Surgery1 Apr 20111191 RESULTS OF A SPLIT APPENDIX TECHNIQUE FOR CONCOMITANT CREATION OF MITROFANOFF AND MALONE CONTINENT CATHETERIZABLE CHANNELS Alice Payton, Shumyle Alam, William Defoor, Eugene Minevich, Pramod Reddy, Paul Noh, and Curtis Sheldon Alice PaytonAlice Payton Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author , Shumyle AlamShumyle Alam Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author , William DefoorWilliam Defoor Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author , Eugene MinevichEugene Minevich Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author , Pramod ReddyPramod Reddy Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author , Paul NohPaul Noh Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author , and Curtis SheldonCurtis Sheldon Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.824AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Urinary tract reconstruction in children with complex urologic abnormalities can be challenging. We have previously reported the technique of splitting the appendix to create both a Mitrofanoff neo-urethra as well as a Malone anterograde continence enema. The purpose of this study is to report our experience and longterm outcomes with this technique. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed of all children and young adults who underwent continent urinary reconstruction who had their Mitrofanoff and Malone created using a split appendix technique at a single pediatric institution from 1990 to 2010. Patient demographics, surgical technique, complications, and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the medical record. The distal end of the appendix was used for the Mitrofanoff and was implanted into the bladder using an extravesical technique and the stoma matured in the right lower quadrant in all cases. The proximal end of the appendix was used for the Malone and the stoma was brought to either the umbilicus or right lower quadrant. RESULTS A total of 40 patients (22 male and 18 female) were identified. Mean age at the time of reconstruction was 7.0 years and mean follow-up was 4.0 years (range 1–13 years). Diagnoses included myelomeningocele (21), anorectal malformation and cloacal anomalies (13), tethered cord and spinal cord abnormalities (6). There were no intra-operative complications or loss of the appendix due to vascular accident. Mitrofanoff outcomes included stomal stenosis in 5 patients, false passage in 2, and mild incontinence in 2. Mitrofanoff stomal revision for stenosis was required in 4 patients. Malone outcomes included stomal stenosis in 8 patients, fecal leakage in 3 patients, traumatic false passage in 2 patients, and prolapse in one patient. Revision of the Malone stoma was required in 3 patients. In addition, stenosis of the Malone was treated with topical steroids in 2 patients, dilation in 2 patients, and temporary Mic-key button placement in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS Creation of continent catheterizable channels for both Mitrofanoff neo-urethra and Malone can be safely and effectively performed using a split appendix technique with an extravesical reimplantation into the bladder. This avoids harvesting additional enteric tissue for purposes of a Monti-mitrofanoff or a neo-appendicostomy. A bowel anastomosis is also avoided when an augmentation is not indicated. Stomal complications are not insignificant however, and comprise the majority of complications for this procedure. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e478 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Alice Payton Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author Shumyle Alam Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author William Defoor Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author Eugene Minevich Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author Pramod Reddy Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author Paul Noh Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author Curtis Sheldon Cincinnati, OH More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...