MLR, ., Spain. Chapters and are, in my opinion, the most interesting as they focus on the writers’ public personas and responses to the issue of women’s writing. ese chapters chronicle the development of female authors, from a cautious Matute to an ambivalent Montero, and finally to the explicitly feminist Etxebarría. Oaknín’s examination of women’s writing and its publication leads to questions concerning marketing and critical reception. ese issues are addressed with the input of the critics Christine Henseler and Laura Freixas. Both Henseler and Freixas criticize the influence of the publishing industry on female writers who, it is argued, have faced gender-specific obstacles while attempting to represent themselves publicly. Oaknín provides strong evidence of gender bias in the promotion and reception of women’s writing in Spain and examines how such bias affects the construction of their public personas. In relation to discriminatory marketing strategies, she argues convincingly that ‘although there is a widespread perception that Western women writers are now living in a post-feminist era of unprecedented opportunities, the traditional sexist stereotypes not only persist, but recur’ (p. ). Oaknín’s study is further characterized by a valuable contextualization of discourses around the legitimacy of the idea of ‘women’s writing’ in present times, when the concepts of women/men and sex/gender are being renegotiated. However, the matrilinear writing that the author projects seems to overlook a fundamental time in the literary history of Spanish women writers, a time that can be considered a starting point. I refer to the writers of the first feminist movement, the ‘liceómanas’. e identities of these writers were concealed behind the names of their male partners (this happened with María Lejárraga, for example), forgotten by the patrilinear literary canon, and/or exiled by the hegemonic patriarchal view of literary production (as was the case with Elena Fortún and others). e liceómanas were the mothers of Matute’s generation of female authors and serve as a stark reminder of the risks taken by non-conforming women in Spain and beyond. us, exploration of the origins of Spanish women’s writings would have shed light on Matute’s cautiousness, Montero’s ambivalence, and Etxebarria’s explicitness. Oaknín’s study might also have benefited from additional exploration of Spain’s most prolific contemporary women writers, who symbolize the prevalence of feminist voices nationally and internationally in the wake of the ‘Me Too’ movement. It would be enriching if future research were to expand on Oaknín’s study by analysing the question of women’s writing through the lens of the social media and their use by contemporary writers. Overall, however, this is a valuable contribution to the field which should be of interest to students and scholars alike. M U M C A Writing and the Revolution: Venezuelan Metafiction –. By K B. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. . x+ pp. £. ISBN –– ––. In anglophone academia, contemporary Venezuelan literature is almost entirely invisible . is is not due to a lack of literary quality or prolific production, but rather Reviews to the particular national landscape created by the Venezuelan petrostate’s political and cultural apparatus. Katie Brown’s monograph explores the intrinsic aesthetic value of literature; how it can be instrumentalized to serve political purposes; and the impact that said instrumentalization has on literary production, access to markets, as well as the creative autonomy and artistic integrity of Venezuelan writers. Brown outlines how, during the Puntofijo period (–), the state-funded professionalization of writing (p. ), literary publishing houses, and promotion ‘gave writers the economic freedom to be creative’ (p. ), producing experimental literature that did not need to cater to international markets (pp. –). Brown asserts that this partially explains the absence of Venezuelan writers from the Latin American Boom (pp. , ). e election of Hugo Chávez to the presidency in inaugurated a new era for culture in Venezuela (p. ): the state’s cultural institutions were put at the service of the Bolivarian Revolution’s ideological project, with a vision of literature grounded in ‘nationalism, socialism, democratisation of literature, and writing as a way of documenting and transferring information rather...
Read full abstract