Steven Weinberg occupies a remarkable place in contemporary physics as well as being one of its most prominent public voices. He cofounded and named the Standard Model of particle physics, which synthesized the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions into a powerful theory amply confirmed by experiment. He is also a skillful and prolific writer not only of magisterial (and innovative) texts on general relativity and field theory but also of a number of very successful popular books. A regular contributor to the New York Review of Books, he is one of the most visible and widely respected physicists of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, both among his peers and the general public; in these respects, one might compare him to Freeman Dyson. An eminent professor at the University of Texas (and many other places before that), Weinberg has in recent years given a course on the history of physics and astronomy, from which grew his new book, To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science. Normally, this journal does not review essentially popular accounts, but Weinberg’s seems a special case because of its author’s eminence and influence and because his book raises important questions about the history of physics, how it is told by physicists and historians, how it is understood by the general public. Weinberg considers that, as a physicist, he can address history with the same vividness that he would bring to a physical problem, starting from first principles to give an account of some complex phenomenon. Indeed, this spirit served him well as he put together the theory that won him fame; he applied the same intellectual independence and freshness to his books on field theory and gravitation, which offered clear and sometimes new syntheses that have taught many physicists a great deal. He applied the same independent judgment to various conceptual issues that emerge from physics. For instance, in a number of writings for the general public he famously championed reductionism over the seductive charms of holism. Blunt and frank, he revels in polemic where he can bring to bear his formidable knowledge of physics, a certain love of contrarian positions, and his skill with words. Thus, his presentation of the history of physics is an event that merits close attention because it presumably will be taken by his peers and the general public as the considered judgment of this eminent physicist about the history of science. Indeed, his interest in history is long-standing; readers of his earlier books will notice how often and how keenly he devotes close attention to the history of the point in question, at times delving into the primary sources and wishing to go beyond often-recounted stories or summary accounts. In that sense, there is much to admire in To Explain the World. Weinberg sets out to explain in some detail the salient history and controversies that formed physics as we now know it, indeed the whole of science. By comparison with many works that stint or even