<h3>Purpose</h3> Imaging capabilities within Radiation Oncology departments are increasing. Departments now have access to MRI imaging with MR-Linacs and designated brachytherapy mobile CBCT scanners. Utilization of these within-department imaging capabilities have the potential to improve clinical brachytherapy workflow. The purpose of this report is to investigate the feasibility of utilizing an MR-LINAC and a mobile CBCT scanner for patient imaging during HDR GYN brachytherapy. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> To compare the spatial integrity of these imaging modalities, an HDR ring and tandem applicator was placed in a water phantom and imaged using a CT simulator (SOMATOM go.Open Pro, Siemens), 0.35T MR-LINAC (MRIdian, ViewRay) and a mobile CBCT scanner (ImagingRing, Elekta). The images acquired included a MR T2 weighted scan, a pelvis image guided brachytherapy CBCT acquisition, and a CT simulation. The images from the MR-LINAC and mobile CBCT scanner were each rigidly registered to CT-SIM images focusing on the applicator. Deviations in ring diameter, angle, and the position of the tip of the applicator was measured on each fusion. Additionally, a patient was imaged with the applicator inserted using the CT-Sim and the MR-LINAC systems. Physician drawn contours using these two modalities were compared to one another to investigate the benefits of incorporating MR-LINAC scans in the clinical HDR treatment planning process. <h3>Results</h3> The applicator was visible on each of the imaging modalities investigated. The deviation in the position of the applicator dimensions were less than 1mm on the MR-CT and CBCT-CT fusions. The analysis of the multimodality image fusions for the applicator revealed no large geometric distortions or loss of image quality when comparing the MR-CBCT image sets to MR-CT image sets. In patient scans, The MR planning image provided superior soft tissue contrast compared to the image acquired using the CT simulator. In this particular case, the superior soft tissue contrast provided by the MR scan provided more information for the physician for target delineation and resulted in a clinical decision to reduce the volume of the GTV. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This work presents a novel clinical workflow for HDR GYN brachytherapy using a mobile CBCT scanner and MR-LINAC for patient imaging. Incorporating the MR T2 scans into the clinical HDR brachytherapy workflow may aide in GYN brachytherapy target and OAR delineation. Additionally, the mobile CBCT scanner can reduce the challenges associated with patient setup and transportation between imaging and treatment locations. We found that the image quality and spatial resolution of MR and mobile CBCT based applicator images were clinically acceptable. A potential clinical workflow could involve using the MRIdian to obtain a planning image and contours the first fraction of treatment. Then on subsequent fractions the mobile CBCT scan could be fused to MR scans and used for daily applicator verification. For future work we will investigate a modified T2 sequence for MR guided brachytherapy to improve catheter reconstruction. Our work validates the clinical feasibility of using new technology for an MR-CBCT clinical workflow for HDR brachytherapy treatment planning.