The use of hybrid nanofluids in real-world situations is essential for enhancing the efficiency of heat transmission, especially in cooling semiconductor technology and industrial processes. The entropy generation on unsteady Al2O3-Cu/H2O hybrid nanofluid flow over a three-dimensional shrinking sheet is addressed numerically in this study, taking into account the effects of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD), nonlinear thermal radiation, porous media, heat generation, viscous dissipation, joule heating, and convective conditions. Using well-known non-similarity transformations, the model is carefully converted from partial differential equations (PDEs) to ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Afterwards, the behaviors of critical physical characteristics are uncovered across different parameter configurations by a numerical solution using the finite difference technique in bvp4c MATLAB. The velocity profiles of hybrid nanofluid grow proportionately with increases in the values of ϕ2,M,A,K and λ parameters. As Rd,θw,Ec,Bi,H and ϕ2 increase, the temperature of the hybrid nanofluid rises, but as M and A increase, the temperature falls. The local skin friction in both the x and y- directions is increased by enhancing the unsteadiness A, nanoparticle volume fraction ϕ2, magnetic M, porous media K, and the ratio of strain rate λ parameter on the shrinking surface. The local Nusselt number is improved by cumulative the unsteadiness A, nanoparticle volume fraction ϕ2, magnetic M, and Biot number Bi parameter in the direction of a shrinking surface, while the Nusselt number decreases when Eckert number Ec, thermal radiation Rd, heat production H, and temperature ratio θw are improved. An upsurge in the magnetic parameter leads to the development of entropy generation. Increasing levels of the magnetic parameters led to a reduction in the Bejan number. At a nanoparticle volume fraction of 1 % and a nonlinearity radiation scenario, where the unsteadiness values are 0.5, the Nusselt number for hybrid nanofluid shows an estimated improvement of 10.55 % compared to regular nanofluid.
Read full abstract