Empirical studies show that asset returns are non-normal and also time varying. These findings explain why the normality VaR and unconditional VaR perform poorly in market risk measurement and management. In the literature, the bivariate conditional copula function can be used to represent a joint distribution function of correlated asset returns whose marginal distributions can be of any form, and to accommodate time varying behavior of asset returns. This study extends the technique further to be able to measure the risk of a portfolio of any number of assets. The extension is successful because the study can endorse a positive definite correlation matrix of the conditional copula function by applying Semidefinite Programming (SDP). The study applies the method in risk measurement of Thai Government bond portfolios. In principle, the method should show improved performance over previous empirical studies, but the results from the Kupiec test show that the conditional copula method fails to estimate the VaR of these portfolios. This failure may have been caused by the misspecification of marginal distribution. ABSTRACT Once several studies have proved that the market value of the companies has dis- tanced themselves from the book value, researchers have been searching the causes that explain the high discrepancy. One research stream focuses the intangible re- sources, and among these, the impact that the intellectual capital shows on the value creation. This study has tested the model proposed by Professor Ante Pulic in order to verify if the intellectual capital exerts a positive impact on the profitability of the compa- nies. The sample reached the Leather Set Up, Leather Artifacts, Travelling Products, and Footwear Sector in Brazil, of which companies are picked up from the data basis of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) that carries out the Annual Industrial Research (PIA), with the national code of economic industry (CNAE) 19. The hypotheses tested were: (I) a positive relationship between profitability and intellectual capital exists; (II) a positive relationship between profitability and stock of intellectual capital exists; (III) a positive relationship between profitability and efficiency of the capi- tal employed exists; (IV) a positive relationship between profitability and efficiency of the human capital exists; (V) a positive relationship between profitability and efficiency of the structural capital exists. Panel data analysis was used in order to corroborate the hypotheses. The obtained results put forward a statistically significant and positive rela- tionship between (the stock and the flow) the intellectual capital and the profitability, measured by Return on Assets (ROA), in static models based on minimum square er- rors. The dynamic models have not been corroborated. ABSTRACT This paper examines empirically the value of early exercise by testing the ability of two American put valuation models to predict the early exercise premium for the S&P 100 American put options. An accuracy test and a quality test are performed on (1) the MacMillan (1986) & Barone-Adesi and Whaley (1987) model, and (2) the Carr, Jarrow and Myneni (1992) model. The test results show that early exercise premium is significant regardless of moneyness. Moreover, consistent with the theory, the value of early exercise is significantly negatively related to moneyness and interest rates and significantly positively related to time to maturity and to the volatility of the underlying index. Both American put valuation models examined misprice the early exercise premium embedded in American put prices.