Statement of problemRestorations with knife-edge margins are more prone to margin chipping during the manufacturing process. Three-dimensional gel deposition shows potential for fabricating zirconia restorations with good margin quality, but studies on its performance in fabricating knife-edged crowns are lacking. PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the 3-dimensional trueness, surface morphology, and margin quality of self-glazed zirconia and soft-milled zirconia crowns with knife-edge margins. Material and methodsAn abutment with a knife-edge finish line design was prepared and scanned with a laboratory scanner. Anatomic contour crowns were designed and fabricated by 3-dimensional gel deposition and soft milling (n=5). The crowns were digitalized, and the scan data were superimposed on the computer-aided design (CAD) data for 3-dimensional deviation analysis. Surface morphology and margin quality were characterized with microscopic examination. ResultsThe self-glazed zirconia crowns showed a smooth and glossy appearance. The soft-milled crowns showed traces left by the removal of support bars and numerous micropits of various sizes. In internal areas, no significant difference was found in root mean square values between the 2 groups (P>.05). For the external surface, self-glazed zirconia showed statistically lower root mean square values than the soft-milled crowns (P<.05). When observed at ×5 magnification, all the self-glazed zirconia crowns showed smooth edges with no defects, whereas small or large margin defects were found in the soft-milled crowns. When characterized at ×200 magnification, minor margin flaws were observed in the self-glazed zirconia crowns. More and larger margin defects were found in the soft-milled crowns. ConclusionsThree-dimensional gel deposition forms a smoother and more homogeneous surface than soft milling. Knife-edged self-glazed zirconia crowns have good dimensional accuracy and margin quality.
Read full abstract