In the paper of Ref. [1], we presented results of studies detailing the electrical properties of a vanadate phase then believed to be a novel compound with the chemical formula LiFeVO4. Since the time of that publication, we have endeavored to probe further into the properties of this material to elucidate the relationships between its structural and electrical properties. This erratum presents recent results that put in doubt the nature of the phase produced and reported in [1]. Our finding is that the primary phase could not be LiFeVO4 as first believed, but instead a LiVO3 and α-Fe2O3 composite. At the time our work was submitted to Ionics there were only two reports claiming the existence of a novel compound with the chemical formula LiFeVO4 [2, 3]. At that time we were studying the conductivity processes in a whole series of LiMVO4 (M=Ni, Co, Zn, Mn, Mg) and therefore we found it intriguing to further investigate the conductivity properties of a novel vanadate. As we mention in [1] “Impedance spectroscopy study of the compound LiFeVO4 has been performed in [11, Ref. 2 of this erratum] and the equivalent circuits of the compound have been given at 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 250°C. In that paper a study of the variation of impedance versus temperature at 50, 100, 125 and 250°C is presented. In our present work an impedance spectroscopy study of the novel compound LiFeVO4 is presented based on a different methodology and perspective than that reported in [11].” Additionally we expanded the temperature range up to 500°C. In Ref. [2] a detailed description of the reaction processes and of the characterization (though preliminary) of the reaction product were presented. In the case of the discovery of a new phase it is common that a provisional structural characterization is provided and in a follow-up work of the same or other authors the actual structural description is given. Based on that we repeated the reaction described in [2] and found that the XRD pattern of our product was identical to that given in [2] unfortunately disregarding the obvious fact that the latter is smoothed. However, we stated in [1] “The main diffraction peaks in Fig. 2 completely coincide with the XRD pattern given in Ref. [11] (in a 20–80° interval) and could be indexed according to that preliminary study in the orthorhombic system, see Fig. 2. In our pattern there are some small peaks which cannot be seen in the smoothed pattern provided in [11,13]. Nevertheless, there is not another source of information in literature for the XRD study of LiFeVO4”. It turns out that there was a simple reason for the existence of these unidentified peaks. Recently, we realized that the XRD pattern of our product can be also indexed considering a two phase system consisting of LiVO3 and α-Fe2O3 [4]. Therefore, we performed a Rietveld analysis on the same X-ray diffraction pattern which has been reported in [1]. Thus, that XRD pattern was treated as a mixture of two phases, α-Fe2O3 and LiVO3. For the latter the structure model described by Muller et al. [5] was The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s11581-010-0428-z.
Read full abstract