Composite Of Major Cardiovascular Events Research Articles

Abstract 18234: Patient Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Long-term Cardiovascular Events: A Population-based study

Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended for secondary prevention following a coronary artery disease (CAD) event. The association between CR attendance and long-term major cardiovascular events (MACE)in the community has not been previously reported . Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that higher CR participation would be related to a lower risk of MACE,in residents of Olmsted county, Minnesota. Methods: We performed a community-based retrospective longitudinal study on patients referred to CR for CAD events or procedures between the years 2002 and 2012. Follow-up was performed using a record linkage system from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. CR participation was assessed as the number of CR sessions attended, and was analyzed as a continuous variable, as quintiles and also as a binomial variable using 12 sessions as the cutoff. The composite outcome MACE was defined as having an acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina), revascularization (CABG or PCI), ventricular arrhythmias requiring hospitalization, stroke or death from any cause. Multivariate models were adjusted for age and gender and also for factors associated with MACE in the univariate analysis. Results: Our cohort included 2273 patients, 69% males, mean age (SEM) 64 (0.26) years. After a mean follow-up of 6 (0.07) years, 827 patients had an event: MI (73), unstable angina (113), CABG(53), PCI (260), ventricular arrhythmia (13), stroke (72) and death (243). Participation in 12 or more sessions (vs <12 sessions) had a lower rate of MACE (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.93, p=0.003, see Figure1 . After adjusting for smoking, hypertension, diabetes and history of MI the association remained significant HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98, p=0.03. Conclusions: A higher participation in CR was associated with a lower risk of MACE. These results provide additional evidence of important CR health advantages and expand on previous evidence of a dose-response benefit of CR.

The impact of hyperglycemia and obesity on hospitalization costs and clinical outcome in general surgery patients

BackgroundThe impact of obesity on clinical outcomes and hospitalization costs in general surgery patients with and without diabetes (DM) is unknown. Materials and MethodsWe reviewed medical records of 2451 patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at two university hospitals. Hyperglycemia was defined as BG ≥140 mg/dl. Overweight was defined by body mass index (BMI) between 25–29.9 kg/m2 and obesity as a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Hospital cost was calculated using cost-charge ratios from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Hospital complications included a composite of major cardiovascular events, pneumonia, bacteremia, acute kidney injury (AKI), respiratory failure, and death. ResultsHyperglycemia was present in 1575 patients (74.8%). Compared to patients with normoglycemia, those with DM and non-DM with hyperglycemia had higher number of complications (8.9% vs. 35.8% vs. 30.0%, p<0.0001), longer hospital stay (5 days vs. 9 days vs. 9 days, p<0.0001), more readmissions within 30 days (9.3% vs. 18.8% vs. 17.2%, p<0.0001), and higher hospitalization costs ($20,273 vs. $79,545 vs. $72,675, p<0.0001). In contrast, compared to normal-weight subjects, overweight and obesity were not associated with increased hospitalization costs ($58,313 vs. $58,173 vs. $66,633, p=0.74) or risk of complications, except for AKI (11.9% vs. 14.8% vs. 20.5%, p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that DM (OR=4.4, 95% CI=2.8,7.0) or perioperative hyperglycemia (OR=4.1, 95% CI=2.7–6.2) were independently associated with increased risk of complications. ConclusionHyperglycemia but not increasing BMI, in patients with and without diabetes undergoing gastrointestinal surgery was associated with a higher number of complications and hospitalization costs.

Intestinal Cholesterol Absorption, Treatment With Atorvastatin, and Cardiovascular Risk in Hemodialysis Patients

BackgroundHemodialysis patients are high absorbers of intestinal cholesterol; they benefit less than other patient groups from statin therapy, which inhibits cholesterol synthesis. ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate whether the individual cholesterol absorption rate affects atorvastatin’s effectiveness to reduce cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis patients. MethodsThis post-hoc analysis included 1,030 participants in the German Diabetes and Dialysis Study (4D) who were randomized to either 20 mg of atorvastatin (n = 519) or placebo (n = 511). The primary endpoint was a composite of major cardiovascular events. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality and all cardiac events. Tertiles of the cholestanol-to-cholesterol ratio, which is an established biomarker of cholesterol absorption, were used to identify high and low cholesterol absorbers. ResultsA total of 454 primary endpoints occurred. On multivariate time-to-event analyses, the interaction term between tertiles and treatment with atorvastatin was significantly associated with the risk of reaching the primary endpoint. Stratified analysis by cholestanol-to-cholesterol ratio tertiles confirmed this effect modification: atorvastatin reduced the risk of reaching the primary endpoint in the first tertile (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; p = 0.049), but not the second (HR: 0.79; p = 0.225) or third tertiles (HR: 1.21; p = 0.287). Atorvastatin consistently significantly reduced all-cause mortality and the risk of all cardiac events in only the first tertile. ConclusionsIntestinal cholesterol absorption, as reflected by cholestanol-to-cholesterol ratios, predicts the effectiveness of atorvastatin to reduce cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis patients. Those with low cholesterol absorption appear to benefit from treatment with atorvastatin, whereas those with high absorption do not benefit.

Targets for Glycemic Control

Targets for Glycemic Control

CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, and long-term stroke outcome in patients without atrial fibrillation

CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores are used to assess stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated whether these scores are associated with stroke outcome in non-AF stroke patients. Consecutive patients with acute first-ever ischemic stroke but without AF were classified into subgroups according to prestroke CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and followed up for 5 years. The end points were death, stroke recurrence, and a composite of major cardiovascular events. Among 1,756 patients (aged 67.2 ± 12.3 years, 68.2% males), there were 258 (14.7%), 617 (35.3%), and 878 (50.0%) patients with low, intermediate, and high CHADS2 score, respectively. The corresponding figures for CHA2DS2-VASc subgroups were 110 (6.3%), 255 (14.5%), and 1,391 (79.2%). There were significant differences between CHADS2 subgroups in 5-year mortality (log-rank test = 74.5, p < 0.0001), stroke recurrence (log-rank test = 12.3, p = 0.002), and cardiovascular events (log-rank test = 19.4, p < 0.001). Similarly, there were significant differences between CHA2DS2-VASc subgroups in 5-year mortality (log-rank test = 74.5, p < 0.0001), stroke recurrence (log-rank test = 10.6, p = 0.005), and cardiovascular events (log-rank test = 16.4, p < 0.001). Compared with the low-risk group, patients in intermediate- and high-risk CHADS2 subgroups had higher 5-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.22 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.78-2.77] and 3.66 [95% CI: 2.38-5.62], respectively), stroke recurrence (HR: 1.74 [95% CI: 1.09-2.79] and 1.71 [95% CI: 1.08-2.71], respectively), and cardiovascular events (HR: 1.78 [95% CI: 1.23-2.57] and 1.86 [95% CI: 1.30-2.67], respectively). Compared with the low-risk group, patients in the high-risk CHA2DS2-VASc subgroup also had higher 5-year mortality (HR: 3.56, 95% CI: 1.89-6.70), stroke recurrence (HR: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.30-6.61), and cardiovascular events (HR: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.49-4.95). Prestroke CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores predict long-term stroke outcomes in non-AF patients with acute ischemic stroke. These scores may provide a simple way of stroke prognostic risk stratification among non-AF stroke patients.

Left Atrial Systolic Force and Outcome in Asymptomatic Mild to Moderate Aortic Stenosis

In patients with chronic pressure overload due to hypertension or aortic valve stenosis (AS), higher left atrial systolic force (LASF) is associated with a high-risk cardiovascular (CV) phenotype. We tested LASF as prognostic marker in patients with AS. We used baseline and outcome data from 1,566 patients recruited in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS (SEAS) study evaluating the effect of placebo-controlled simvastatin and ezetimibe treatment on CV events. The primary outcome was a composite of major CV events, including CV death, aortic valve replacement, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure caused by progression of AS, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, and nonhemorrhagic stroke. LASF was calculated by Manning's method. High LASF was defined as >95th percentile (50 Kdynes/cm(2)) of the distribution within the study population. During 4.3 years of follow-up, a major CV event occurred in 38 of 78 patients with high LASF (49%) and in 513 of 1,488 (34%) with normal LASF (P = 0.01). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, high LASF predicted higher rate of major CV events (Hazard ratio 1.43 [95% confidence interval 1.01-2.03] independent of aortic valve area and LV mass index. A simple risk score including absence or presence of these three variables allowed risk stratification into low, intermediate, high and very high risk for major CV events during follow-up (22%, 28%, 38%, and 53%, respectively). Higher LASF provides additional prognostic information in patients with asymptomatic mild-to-moderate AS.

Effect of Online Hemodiafiltration on All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes

In patients with ESRD, the effects of online hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events are unclear. In this prospective study, we randomly assigned 714 chronic hemodialysis patients to online postdilution hemodiafiltration (n=358) or to continue low-flux hemodialysis (n=356). The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. The main secondary endpoint was a composite of major cardiovascular events, including death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, therapeutic coronary intervention, therapeutic carotid intervention, vascular intervention, or amputation. After a mean 3.0 years of follow-up (range, 0.4-6.6 years), we did not detect a significant difference between treatment groups with regard to all-cause mortality (121 versus 127 deaths per 1000 person-years in the online hemodiafiltration and low-flux hemodialysis groups, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.20). The incidences of cardiovascular events were 127 and 116 per 1000 person-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.39). Receiving high-volume hemodiafiltration during the trial associated with lower all-cause mortality, a finding that persisted after adjusting for potential confounders and dialysis facility. In conclusion, this trial did not detect a beneficial effect of hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events compared with low-flux hemodialysis. On-treatment analysis suggests the possibility of a survival benefit among patients who receive high-volume hemodiafiltration, although this subgroup finding requires confirmation.

Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe Plus Rosuvastatin Versus Rosuvastatin Up-Titration in Hypercholesterolemic Patients at Risk for Atherosclerotic Coronary Heart Disease

Synopsis: Hypercholesterolemic patients at risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) may require up-titration of ongoing statin therapy or addition of complementary lipid-lowering drugs to achieve guideline recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Previous studies have not assessed LDL-C lowering of ezetimibe added to rosuvastatin starting doses. Although ezetimibe/simvastatin was recently shown to reduce a composite of major cardiovascular events commensurate with the degree of LDL-C lowering achieved in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (SHARP trial), clinical benefit of ezetimibe add-on beyond statin alone awaits results from the ongoing IMPROVE-IT trial.

Inclusion of Stroke as an Outcome and Risk Equivalent in Risk Scores for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Vascular Disease

Current guideline statements for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) rely on estimates of absolute risk of coronary events. For example, the American Heart Association guidelines on primary prevention state that persons with ≥10% risk over 10 years of myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary death should be considered for antiplatelet therapy with aspirin.1 Similarly, the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines2 state that target low-density lipoprotein level should be based on projected absolute risk of future coronary events rather than on presence or absence of specific risk factors. These guidelines state that patients at high risk of MI and coronary death, defined as an absolute 10-year risk of ≥20%, should have a target low-density lipoprotein level <100 mg/dL and should receive statin therapy if needed to achieve this goal. Stroke, however, is not included as one of the outcomes contributing to these absolute risk levels. Included in the group of patients with elevated risk, moreover, are those who already have ischemic heart disease, as well as patients deemed to be “coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalents,” indicating those at the same elevated risk as patients with ischemic heart disease. CHD risk equivalents include patients with diabetes mellitus, those with multiple risk factors that put them at elevated risk based on calculation of their Framingham Score, and patients with “other forms of symptomatic atherosclerotic disease.” The latter group is further defined to include those with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and carotid artery disease. The category of “risk equivalents” in the ATP III guidelines, however, does not include the vast majority (≈80%3) of ischemic stroke patients without carotid artery disease as cause of their stroke. Ischemic stroke is therefore notably excluded from the list of outcomes contributing to …

Prevention of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: Rationale and design of the Nateglinide And Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) Trial

Patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) have increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lifestyle modification and medication can prevent or delay progression to diabetes (PD), but whether such interventions also reduce the risk of CVD has not been rigorously tested. The Nateglinide And Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, 2 x 2 factorial trial in subjects with IGT (on a screening oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]) aged > or = 50 years with known CVD or aged > or = 55 years with > or = 1 CVD risk factor. Enrollment began in January 2002 and was completed January 2004, with 9,518 patients randomized to receive 1 of 4 possible treatment combinations as follows: nateglinide with valsartan, nateglinide with valsartan-placebo, nateglinide-placebo with valsartan, or nateglinide-placebo with valsartan-placebo. All subjects are participating in a clinic-based and telephone-based lifestyle intervention aimed at reducing weight and dietary fat and increasing physical activity. The 3 coprimary end points are new onset of T2DM, a "core" composite of major cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure), and an "extended" composite including the components of the core composite plus coronary revascularization and hospitalization for unstable angina. The study was designed to evaluate whether reducing postprandial hyperglycemia, blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, or both interventions reduce the risk of T2DM or cardiovascular events in patients with IGT.

Success, Safety, and Efficacy of Implantation of Diamond-Like Carbon-Coated Stents

The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and clinically defined efficacy of the implantation of a new stent coated with diamond-like carbon (DLC stent), in a group of patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization procedures in two hemodynamic centers. This study was an observational prospective nonrandomized study that included 196 patients with a total of 236 significant de novo atheromatous coronary lesions, in which 245 DLC stents were implanted. The primary end point of this study was a composite of major cardiovascular events (death or acute myocardial infarction with or without Q) and need for target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR) procedure during the first 48 hours and at 6 months after the DLC stent implantation. All patients had a myocardial perfusion imaging study with Tl(201) at 6 months after DLC stent implantation. Only patients with a myocardial perfusion imaging study indicative of myocardial ischemia were then submitted for a new coronary angiogram. No major cardiovascular event or emergency TVR occurred during hospitalization. At 6-month follow-up no major cardiovascular event occurred either, whereas the rate for TLR was 5.6% and that for TVR was 7.65%. This preliminary study provides enough clinical evidence that implantation of intracoronary bare metal stents coated with diamond-like carbon is associated with high success rates, safety, and efficacy, both in the hospital and at the 6-month follow-up after the interventional procedure.

Association hypoprothrombinémie-syndrome des antiphospholipides chez un patient lupique

There is a paucity of data on the prevalence of risk factors and their associations with incident cardiovascular disease in women compared with men, especially from low-income and middle-income countries.In the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study, we enrolled participants from the general population from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries and followed them up for approximately 10 years. We recorded information on participants’ metabolic, behavioural, and psychosocial risk factors. For this analysis, we included participants aged 35–70 years at baseline without a history of cardiovascular disease, with at least one follow-up visit. The primary outcome was a composite of major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular disease deaths, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure). We report the prevalence of each risk factor in women and men, their hazard ratios (HRs), and population-attributable fractions (PAFs) associated with major cardiovascular disease. The PURE study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03225586.In this analysis, we included 155 724 participants enrolled and followed-up between Jan 5, 2005, and Sept 13, 2021, (90 934 [58·4%] women and 64 790 [41·6%] men), with a median follow-up of 10·1 years (IQR 8·5–12·0). At study entry, the mean age of women was 49·8 years (SD 9·7) compared with 50·8 years (9·8) in men. As of data cutoff (Sept 13, 2021), 4280 major cardiovascular disease events had occurred in women (age-standardised incidence rate of 5·0 events [95% CI 4·9–5·2] per 1000 person-years) and 4911 in men (8·2 [8·0–8·4] per 1000 person-years). Compared with men, women presented with a more favourable cardiovascular risk profile, especially at younger ages. The HRs for metabolic risk factors were similar in women and men, except for non-HDL cholesterol, for which high non-HDL cholesterol was associated with an HR for major cardiovascular disease of 1·11 (95% CI 1·01–1·21) in women and 1·28 (1·19–1·39) in men, with a consistent pattern for higher risk among men than among women with other lipid markers. Symptoms of depression had a HR of 1·09 (0·98–1·21) in women and 1·42 (1·25–1·60) in men. By contrast, consumption of a diet with a PURE score of 4 or lower (score ranges from 0 to 8), was more strongly associated with major cardiovascular disease in women (1·17 [1·08–1·26]) than in men (1·07 [0·99–1·15]). The total PAFs associated with behavioural and psychosocial risk factors were greater in men (15·7%) than in women (8·4%) predominantly due to the larger contribution of smoking to PAFs in men (ie, 1·3% [95% CI 0·5–2·1] in women vs 10·7% [8·8–12·6] in men).Lipid markers and depression are more strongly associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease in men than in women, whereas diet is more strongly associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease in women than in men. The similar associations of other risk factors with cardiovascular disease in women and men emphasise the importance of a similar strategy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in men and women.Funding sources are listed at the end of the Article.

Surgical treatment for secundum atrial septal defects in patients >40 years old: A randomized clinical trial

ObjectivesWe prospectively examined whether surgical treatment of secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) in patients ≥40 years old improves their long-term clinical outcome. BackgroundSurgical treatment of secundum ASDs in adults >40 years old is a subject of controversy because of the perception of good long-term clinical outcomes in patients with unrepaired ASDs and the lack of data from randomized trials. MethodsWe recruited 521 patients >40 years old with secundum ASDs referred for treatment; 48 were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to surgical closure (n = 232) or medical treatment (n = 241). The primary and secondary end points were a composite of major cardiovascular events (death, pulmonary embolism, major arrhythmic event, embolic cerebrovascular event, recurrent pulmonary infection, functional class deterioration or heart failure) and overall mortality, respectively. We assessed possible prognostic markers. The analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. ResultsThe median follow-up period was 7.3 years (range 2 to 13). The risk of having the primary end point was significantly higher in the medical group, which had a univariate hazards ratio of 1.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23 to 3.22) and a multivariate hazards ratio of 1.85 (95% CI 1.08 to 3.17). Although the survival analysis did not reveal differences in overall mortality between the surgical and medical treatments (hazards ratio 1.71, 95% CI 0.76 to 3.86), the multivariate analysis, adjusted by age at entry, mean pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac index, demonstrated significant differences between the study groups (hazards ratio 4.09, 95% CI 1.41 to 11.89). ConclusionsSurgical closure was superior to medical treatment in improving both the composite of major cardiovascular events and overall mortality in patients >40 years old with secundum ASDs. This superiority was related to the mean pulmonary artery pressure, age at diagnosis and cardiac index. Because of the higher risk of morbidity and mortality, we believe that anatomic closure should always be attempted as the initial treatment for ASDs in adults >40 years old with pulmonary artery systolic pressure <70 mm Hg and a pulmonary/systemic output ratio ≥1.7. The operation must be performed as soon as possible, even if the symptoms or the hemodynamic impact seems to be minimal.