You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD35-02 RETROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM OUTCOMES AFTER ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER FOLLOWING URETHROPLASTY Meghan Davis, Erin Hays, Peter Kolyvas, Margaret Higgins, Derek Wengryn, Brian Flynn, Reynaldo Gomez, Joshua Sterling, Alexander Chartier, Dmitriy Nikolavsky, Akio Horiguchi, Matthias Hofer, Jose Bernal, Francisco Martins, Felix Campos Juanatey, Henriette Veiby Holm, Jay Simhan, Stuart Boyd, Javier Angulo, Jeffrey Loh Doyle, and Krishnan Venkatesan Meghan DavisMeghan Davis More articles by this author , Erin HaysErin Hays More articles by this author , Peter KolyvasPeter Kolyvas More articles by this author , Margaret HigginsMargaret Higgins More articles by this author , Derek WengrynDerek Wengryn More articles by this author , Brian FlynnBrian Flynn More articles by this author , Reynaldo GomezReynaldo Gomez More articles by this author , Joshua SterlingJoshua Sterling More articles by this author , Alexander ChartierAlexander Chartier More articles by this author , Dmitriy NikolavskyDmitriy Nikolavsky More articles by this author , Akio HoriguchiAkio Horiguchi More articles by this author , Matthias HoferMatthias Hofer More articles by this author , Jose BernalJose Bernal More articles by this author , Francisco MartinsFrancisco Martins More articles by this author , Felix Campos JuanateyFelix Campos Juanatey More articles by this author , Henriette Veiby HolmHenriette Veiby Holm More articles by this author , Jay SimhanJay Simhan More articles by this author , Stuart BoydStuart Boyd More articles by this author , Javier AnguloJavier Angulo More articles by this author , Jeffrey Loh DoyleJeffrey Loh Doyle More articles by this author , and Krishnan VenkatesanKrishnan Venkatesan More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003333.02AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is generally accepted as the gold standard for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). There is limited and conflicting evidence on outcomes when urethroplasty precedes AUS insertion, and even less scrutiny of whether and how urethroplasty technique affects these outcomes. We sought to evaluate complications of AUS insertion after urethroplasty in a multi-institutional cohort. We hypothesize that complications occur at higher rates in this population and vary between augmentation and anastomotic urethroplasty. METHODS: 108 patients were identified who underwent AUS after urethroplasty. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. Urethroplasties were categorized as either transecting or non-transecting. Long term complications included AUS infection, erosion, and mechanical failure. Analysis was performed using Stata/BE 17.0. For descriptive statistics, continuous variables were presented as the mean or median and categorical variables were presented as absolute numbers and percentages. Chi squared test was used for categorical variables. Tests performed were two-sided and p<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: 108 cases were identified that were performed by 13 surgeons (range 2-26). Characteristics of the sample are included in Table 1. Long term AUS complication risk including AUS infection, erosion, and mechanical failure following transecting urethroplasty was 53% compared to 29% following non-transecting urethroplasty (p=0.01). Among 59 patients who had non-transecting urethroplasty, 10 experienced erosion, 3 infection, and 3 mechanical failure. Among 49 patients who had transecting urethroplasty, 16 experienced erosion and 10 mechanical failure. Median follow-up was 30 months following AUS insertion. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing AUS insertion after urethroplasty, complications occur at higher rates than outcomes in the general population. Patients who undergo transecting urethroplasty are twice as likely to experience AUS complications compared to patients who had undergone non-transecting urethroplasty. Non-transecting urethroplasty may be advisable if a subsequent need for AUS is anticipated. Source of Funding: N/a © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e974 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Meghan Davis More articles by this author Erin Hays More articles by this author Peter Kolyvas More articles by this author Margaret Higgins More articles by this author Derek Wengryn More articles by this author Brian Flynn More articles by this author Reynaldo Gomez More articles by this author Joshua Sterling More articles by this author Alexander Chartier More articles by this author Dmitriy Nikolavsky More articles by this author Akio Horiguchi More articles by this author Matthias Hofer More articles by this author Jose Bernal More articles by this author Francisco Martins More articles by this author Felix Campos Juanatey More articles by this author Henriette Veiby Holm More articles by this author Jay Simhan More articles by this author Stuart Boyd More articles by this author Javier Angulo More articles by this author Jeffrey Loh Doyle More articles by this author Krishnan Venkatesan More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract