Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections Research Articles

1080. Relebactam Increases Imipenem Activity Against Imipenem-Nonsusceptible and -Susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales: Assessment of Isolates from RESTORE-IMI 2

BackgroundRelebactam (REL) inhibits class A and C β-lactamases (BLs) and is approved in the US in the combination imipenem/cilastatin/REL (IMI/REL) for hospital acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), and also in patients with limited treatment options for complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intraabdominal infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potentiation of imipenem (IMI) by REL in baseline respiratory isolates from the recently completed Phase 3 RESTORE-IMI 2 study that demonstrated efficacy and safety of IMI/REL in the treatment of patients with HABP/VABP.MethodsBaseline lower respiratory tract (LRT) isolates were evaluated for IMI MICs in the presence and absence of REL using broth microdilution and CLSI interpretive criteria. All Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales for which IMI/REL is either indicated or the MIC90 is less than or equal to the susceptibility breakpoint were evaluated.ResultsSummary statistics and the MIC distribution for P. aeruginosa are shown in the figure. For P. aeruginosa, REL reduces the IMI mode MIC of IMI-nonsusceptible (IMI-NS) (MIC >2) isolates ≥8-fold (from 16-32 to 2 µg/mL) and that of IMI-susceptible (IMI-S) (MIC ≤2) isolates ≥2-fold (from 1 to ≤0.5 µg/mL). Among Enterobacterales, the IMI mode MIC of IMI-NS (MIC >1) isolates was reduced ≥4-fold (from 2 to ≤0.5 µg/mL). REL enhanced the activity of IMI among IMI-S isolates (MIC ≤1), most notably observed in Enterobacterales species that produce a chromosomal AmpC, increasing the proportion with MIC ≤0.5 µg/mL from 76% to 98%.MIC Distribution and Summary Statistics of RESTORE IMI-2 Isolates ConclusionAmong baseline LRT isolates from RESTORE-IMI 2 the potentiation of IMI by REL results in the restoration of susceptibility among IMI-NS P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhanced IMI activity among IMI-S isolates. This enhanced activity among IMI-S Enterobacterales is most notable among species with reported chromosomal expression of AmpC. This lowering of IMI MICs upon addition of REL contributes to the high probability of target attainment (≥90%) observed following administration of IMI/REL 1.25g every 6 hours, further supporting the IMI/REL efficacy data observed in RESTORE-IMI 2.Disclosures David W. Hilbert, PhD, Merck (Employee) C. Andrew DeRyke, PharmD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Maria C. Losada, BA, Merck (Employee) Pamela Moise, PharmD, Merck (Employee) Luke F. Chen, MBBS MPH MBA FRACP FSHEA FIDSA, Merck (Employee) Katherine Young, MS, Merck (Employee)

1290. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Report in a Third Level Hospital in Mexico City

BackgroundThe surge of resistant Gram-negative organisms has been worrying infectious disease physicians and physicians in general because of the lack of a large number of antibiotics to which these organisms remain susceptible. Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a drug approved by the FDA to treat complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) in combination with metronidazole, and recently for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Worldwide resistance rates of Enterobacteriaceae to CAZ-AVI have been reported below 2.6%, and 4-8% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The FDA, CLSI, and EUCAST assigned the clinical breakpoints of susceptibility: MIC < /=8 mg/liter susceptible, and >/=8mg/liter, resistant. In Mexico, CAZ-AVI was approved in 2018, and its cost is very high compared to other antimicrobials, so its use is limited in very specific cases. The resistance rates to this antibiotic in the Mexican population remain largely unknown. MethodsWe tested 106 specimens for susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam using the disk Kirby-Bauer method. The inhibition zone diameter was determined in all cases and we considered the organism susceptible when the inhibition zone diameter was >=21 mm, and resistant with an inhibition zone diameter < = 20 mm. ResultsWe found 5 specimens (4.71%) resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam, corresponding to E. coli (3) and P. aeruginosa (2). Two of these were also resistant to colistin, and 4 to meropenem. All carbapenem-resistant isolates harbored Metallo-beta-lactamases genes, for E. coli was NDM gen, and for P. aeruginosa the VIM gene(GeneXpert® Cepheid). ConclusionThe ceftazidime-avibactam resistance among Gram-negative bacteria in our study is similar to the one reported in other international studies. We need more studies in our population to know the nationwide resistance to this antibiotic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

1143. Safety and Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem in Neonatal and Pediatric Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 2, Randomized, Clinical Trial

BackgroundCeftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a cephalosporin–β-lactamase inhibitor combination approved to treat complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infections, and nosocomial pneumonia in adults. Safety and efficacy of C/T in neonatal and pediatric participants with cUTI was assessed.MethodsThis phase 2, randomized, double-blind study (NCT03230838) compared C/T with meropenem (MEM) for treatment of cUTI, including pyelonephritis in participants from birth to 18 years of age. Treatment duration was 7-14 days. After 3 days of intravenous therapy, optional oral step-down therapy was allowed. Participants were stratified and dosed by age group (Table 1). The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of C/T compared with MEM, and key secondary end points included clinical response and per-participant microbiologic response at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC). ResultsParticipants were randomized 3:1 and treated with C/T (n=100) or MEM (n=33). The microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population (mMITT) included 95 participants in the C/T (n=71) and MEM (n=24) arms; the most common reason for mMITT exclusion was lack of a qualifying baseline uropathogen (28.4%). Pyelonephritis was the most common baseline diagnosis (83.2%), and Escherichia coli was the most common qualifying baseline uropathogen (77.9%). Overall mean treatment duration was comparable in both arms (C/T, 10.2 days; MEM, 10.7); a total of 50 (70.4%) and 20 (83.3%) participants switched to optional oral step-down therapy in the C/T and MEM arms, respectively, both for a mean of approximately 6 days. The overall incidence of adverse events (AE; all and drug related), serious AE (SAE), and AE leading to discontinuation was comparable between C/T and MEM arms. There were no AE leading to death, drug-related SAE, or discontinuations due to drug-related AE or SAE (Table 2). For C/T and MEM, rates of clinical cure and microbiologic eradication at EOT and TOC were high (Figure). ConclusionIn this study, C/T was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to MEM and to the previously reported safety profile for C/T in adults with cUTI. C/T achieved high clinical cure and microbiologic eradication rates and is a potential new treatment option for children with cUTI.Disclosures Emmanuel Roilides, MD, PhD, FIDSA, FAAM, FESCMID, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Negar Ashouri, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Grant/Research Support) Matthew G. Johnson, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Julia Lonchar, MSc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee, Shareholder) Feng-Hsiu Su, MPH, MBA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee, Shareholder) Jennifer A. Huntington, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Myra W. Popejoy, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee) Mekki Bensaci, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Carisa S. De Anda, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee, Shareholder) Elizabeth G. Rhee, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (Employee, Shareholder) Christopher Bruno, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee)

1295. Susceptibility to Ceftolozane/Tazobactam and Comparators Among Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Collected from Patients in Hospitals in Latin America – SMART 2017-2019

Abstract Background Ceftolozane is a cephalosporin specifically developed to have enhanced antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa. Combined with tazobactam, it was approved by FDA and EMA for complicated urinary tract and intraabdominal infections, as well as hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. We evaluated the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) against P. aeruginosa isolates collected as part of the global SMART surveillance program in 10 countries in Latin America. Methods In 2017-2019, 41 clinical labs each collected up to 250 consecutive gram-negative pathogens per year from various infection sources. A total of 21,864 isolates were collected, of which 3,335 (15.3%) were P. aeruginosa. MICs were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and breakpoints. C/T-nonsusceptible (NS) P. aeruginosa isolates were screened for genes encoding β-lactamases. Results The table shows the antimicrobial susceptibility of P. aeruginosa and β-lactam-NS subsets. C/T was active against 85.9% of all collected P. aeruginosa, with lowest activity against isolates collected in Chile and Venezuela, where 28.0% and 23.2% of isolates, respectively, carried carbapenemases, and highest activity against isolates from Ecuador and Guatemala, where 2.2% and 4.2%, respectively, were carbapenemase-positive. Substantial variability in the activity of C/T and comparators was observed among β-lactam-NS subsets. In aggregate, however, C/T remained active against 59.9% of all meropenem-NS P. aeruginosa isolates from Latin America (n=1,101), 57.3% of piperacillin/tazobactam-NS isolates (n=1054), 48.9% of cefepime-NS isolates (n=895), and 50.3% of ceftazidime-NS isolates (n=937). Conversely, other common β-lactams (meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and piperacillin/tazobactam) remained active against 8-38% of these resistant isolates. Results Table Conclusion C/T showed the highest activity against P. aeruginosa among the tested β-lactam antibiotics. While amikacin showed similar or better activity in vitro, its toxicities severely limit its clinical use. Given the desirability of β-lactams among clinicians, C/T represents an important option in the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa in Latin America. Disclosures Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Meredith Hackel, PhD MPH, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) C. Andrew DeRyke, PharmD, Merck &amp; Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jacquleine Pavía, MSc, Merck &amp; Co, Inc (Employee) Fakhar Siddiqui, PhD, Merck &amp; Co, Inc (Employee) Katherine Young, MS, Merck (Employee) Mary Motyl, PhD, Merck &amp; Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor)

1274. Activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Imipenem/Relebactam, and Comparators Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Patients with Bloodstream and Other Infection Types—SMART United States/Canada 2018-2019

BackgroundCeftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a β-lactamase inhibitor, was approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract (cUTI) and intraabdominal infections (cIAI), and hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HAP/VAP). Imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL) is a combination of imipenem/cilastatin with relebactam, an inhibitor of class A and C β-lactamases. IMI/REL was approved for HAP/VAP and for infections due to aerobic gram-negative organisms in adults with limited treatment options (e.g., cUTI, cIAI). We compared the activity of C/T and IMI/REL against P. aeruginosa from bloodstream infections (BSI) to those from other infection types.MethodsAs part of the SMART program, 24 hospitals in the US and 8 in Canada each collected up to 250 consecutive gram-negative isolates per year in 2018-2019 from patients with BSI, lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), IAI, and UTI. A total of 2351 Pa isolates were collected. MICs were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and breakpoints.Results Pa isolates from BSI tended to show higher susceptibility than IAI, UTI, and especially LRTI isolates (Table). Susceptibility to the tested comparator β-lactams was 11-12 percentage points lower among LRTI than BSI isolates, while C/T and IMI/REL susceptibility was only 2-5% lower. Even among BSI isolates, the comparator β-lactams were active against only 75-88% of isolates, while C/T and IMI/REL were active against >95%. Only amikacin showed higher activity. Analyzing coverage by either C/T or IMI/REL, 98.7% of Pa isolates from BSI were susceptible to one or both agents. C/T and IMI/REL maintained activity against 89% and 69% of meropenem-nonsusceptible (MEM-NS) Pa isolates from BSI (n=36), respectively, and 87% and 76% of piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T)-NS Pa (n=38).Results Table ConclusionEven among BSI isolates, which were generally more susceptible than those from other infection types, Pa susceptibility to commonly used β-lactams like MEM and P/T was < 90%, 7-23% lower than C/T and IMI/REL. Given the desirability of β-lactams among clinicians and the >98% coverage by either C/T or IMI/REL of Pa isolates from BSI, both agents represent important options in the treatment of patients with BSI.Disclosures Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Meredith Hackel, PhD MPH, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) C. Andrew DeRyke, PharmD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Kelly Harris, PharmD, BCPS, Merck & Co. Inc (Employee) Katherine Young, MS, Merck (Employee) Mary Motyl, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor)

110. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in Chinese Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

BackgroundIn China, the prevalence of infections due to multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria is high and additional treatment options for complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) are needed. This study compared the efficacy and safety of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) + metronidazole (MTZ) versus meropenem (MEM) + placebo (pbo) for the treatment of cIAI in adult Chinese participants.MethodsThis was a phase 3, double-blind study conducted at 21 centers in China (NCT03830333). Participants aged 18-75 years with cIAI requiring surgical intervention within 24 hours of study drug administration were stratified by site of infection and randomized 1:1 to receive 1.5 g C/T (1 g ceftolozane and 0.5 g tazobactam) + 0.5 g MTZ administered intravenously (IV) every 8 hours (q8h) or 1 g MEM + pbo administered IV q8h for 4-14 days. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at test of cure (TOC) in the clinically evaluable (CE) population. Secondary endpoints included rates of clinical cure, per-participant microbiologic response, per-pathogen microbiologic response, and adverse events (AE). Non-inferiority for clinical cure at TOC in the CE population was confirmed if the lower bound of the 2-sided 95% CI for the between-treatment difference in the clinical cure rate was larger than −12.5%.ResultsA total of 134 participants were randomized to each treatment group. Demographics and baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between treatment groups (Table 1). The median (range) age in the ITT population was 50 (18-75) years and 61% were men. The most frequent sites of infection were the appendix (C/T + MTZ, 50.0%; MEM + pbo, 49.3%) and gallbladder (C/T + MTZ, 27.6%; MEM + pbo, 29.1%). Overall, the most frequently isolated pathogens were Escherichia coli (61.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.3%); few anaerobes were isolated (Table 1). C/T + MTZ was non-inferior to MEM + pbo for clinical cure in the CE population (C/T + MTZ, 95.2%; MEM + pbo, 93.1%; difference, 2.1% [95% CI, −4.7% to 8.8%]). Results for key secondary endpoints were comparable between treatment groups (Table 2). Rates of AEs were generally similar between treatment groups (Table 3). ConclusionC/T + MTZ was non-inferior to MEM + pbo in the treatment of adult Chinese participants with cIAI and demonstrated a favorable safety profile.Disclosures Xiaofei Chen, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Xiaoling Du, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Ye Wang, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Hui Wang, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Fang Sun, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Matthew G. Johnson, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Mekki Bensaci, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Jennifer A. Huntington, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Christopher Bruno, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee)

1243. Eravacycline in Bacteremia: A Case Series

BackgroundEravacycline (ERV) is FDA-approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, but there is limited experience for non-FDA approved indications. MethodsWe present five cases that utilized ERV for treatment of bacteremia.ResultsPatient 1 in septic shock (SS) started on vancomycin (VAN) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA). Blood culture (BC) finalized to E. coli and regimen narrowed to CZA. On day 9, gram-positive cocci in chains in BC grew and VAN was added. BC finalized to VRE faecium and regimen was modified to ERV on day 12. Repeat BC on day 15 finalized to no growth with no recurrence of bacteremia until discharged (day 78). Patient 2 treated for MSSA bacteremia with cefazolin and subsequent K. pneumoniae VAP treated with ceftriaxone (CRO) (day 18-26). On day 27, meropenem (MEM) was initiated for gram-negative bacteremia and started on IV trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) the following day for pneumonia caused by TMP/SMX-susceptible S. maltophila. BC finalized on day 29 to S. maltophila resistant to TMP/SMX, regimen modified to ERV. Repeat BC on day 30 finalized to no growth and ERV was continued until day 42 with no recurrence of bacteremia; however, patient died on day 45. Patient 3 with renal failure and on day 11, CRO started for SBP prophylaxis. On day 13, switched to daptomycin and cefepime (FEP) as patient was febrile and BC repeated. BC finalized to VRE faecium and was started on ERV on day 17 and completed a 7-day course with no recurrence of bacteremia; however, patient died on day 34. Patient 4 initially treated for bacterial superinfection with CRO and azithromycin, and subsequent worsening pneumonia treated with VAN and MEM (day 10-17). On day 19, patient was febrile and treated with VAN and FEP until day 27. Repeat BC on day 29 finalized to VRE species and modified to ERV on day 32. ERV continued for a 7-day course and was discharged with no repeat BC obtained to confirm clearance. Patient 5 in SS started on VAN and MEM. On day 3, BC on admission finalized to VRE faecium and therapy switched to ERV. Repeat BC taken on day 3 after ERV initiation were negative. Discharged to complete two-week course of ERV.ConclusionERV may be an option for bacteremia as demonstrated by clearance in four of five cases. More studies must be conducted as these reports show variable clinical outcomes.Disclosures Joshua R. Rosenberg, MD, Allergan/Abbvie (Consultant)La Jolla/Tetraphase (Consultant)Melinta (Consultant)Merck (Consultant)Paratek (Consultant)Sanofi (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)

1288. Evaluation of Predictors for Clinical Success in Patients Treated with Eravacycline for Various Infections

Abstract Background Eravacycline (ERV) is approved in the United States (US) for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults. We aimed to evaluate the independent predictors of clinical success in patients treated with ERV for various infections. Methods Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted from September, 2018 to April, 2021. We included adults treated with ERV for ≥ 72hours. Clinical success was defined as 30-day survival, lack of 30-day infection-recurrence, and resolution of infection signs/symptoms. All outcomes were measured from ERV initiation. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed to identify independent predictors of clinical success. Clinically relevant variables were selected for model entry based on bivariate comparisons (P&amp;lt; 0.2) in a backward fashion. Results We included 223 patients from 16 medical centers in 13 geographically unique states. The median (IQR) age was 61 (50-69) years, 57% were male and 62% were Caucasian. Median (IQR) APACHE II, and Charlson Comorbidity scores were 15 (10-21), and 3 (1-5), respectively. Sources of infection were primarily intra-abdominal (27%) and respiratory (27%). Common pathogens included Acinetobacter baumannii (21%) and those of the Enterobacterales order (36%). Infectious diseases consultation and surgical interventions were obtained in 93.7% and 52% respectively. Clinical success occurred in 64%, specifically 30-day survival in 78%, absence of 30-day infection-recurrence in 93%, and 74% experienced resolution of infection signs/symptoms. Since characteristics and outcomes were similar among various pathogens, MLR was conducted using the overall cohort. Skin as a source and combination therapy with ERV were independently associated with higher clinical success: odds ratio 3.3 [CI 1.1-10.2] and 2.9 [1.4-5.9], respectively. Whereas, ICU admission at culture time and undergoing surgery within 30 days of culture were independently associated with reduced odds of clinical success: 0.4 [0.17-0.80] and 0.3 [0.11-0.63] respectively. Conclusion Although most ERV treated patients experienced clinical success, factors independently associated with higher clinical success are crucial to consider for optimum antibiotic selection. Disclosures Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, GenMark (Speaker’s Bureau) Madeline King, PharmD, tetraphase (Speaker’s Bureau) Michael P. Veve, Pharm.D., Cumberland (Grant/Research Support)Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Research Grant or Support) Bruce M. Jones, PharmD, BCPS, Abbvie (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)La Jolla (Speaker’s Bureau)Melinta (Consultant)Merck (Consultant)Paratek (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau) Susan L. Davis, PharmD, Nothing to disclose Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Research Grant or Support)

The European Medicines Agency Approved the New Antibacterial Drugs – Response to the 2017 Who Report on the Global Problem of Multi-Drug Resistance

Abstract The growing problem of antimicrobial resistance has been classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as one of the top ten threats to mankind. In a special report published in 2017, the WHO presented a list of microorganisms for which the search for new therapeutic options is a priority. The highest (critical) priority was given to the search for new antibiotics active against carbapenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as well as against carbapenem- and third-generation-cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales strains (so-called critical priority pathogens). Whereas the second (high) priority was given among others to the search for new antibiotics active against methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and VRSA) and vancomycin-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium (VRE). Since the publication of the WHO report the European Medicines Agency has approved 6 novel, broad-spectrum antibiotics, from 6 different groups, addressing the priority pathogens to a different extent. Two of them are new combinations of carbapenems with non-β-lactam inhibitors of β-lactamases (active also against carbapenemases), belonging to two novel groups of inhibitors: diazabicyclooctanes (relebactam, combined with imipenem) and boronates (vaborbactam, combined with meropenem). The third new drug is a siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) with an innovative mechanism of penetration into the bacterial cell. The next two antibiotics are the new fluoroquinolone (delafloxacin) and the new tetracycline (eravacycline), designed and synthesized to be more active than older members of these groups. The last innovative antibiotic is lefamulin – the first pleuromutilin approved for systemic use in humans. New approvals have expanded the number of available therapeutic options in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (meropenem/vaborbactam, cefiderocol), complicated intra-abdominal infections (meropenem/vaborbactam, eravacycline), nosocomial pneumonia (meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam), acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (delafloxacin) and community-acquired pneumonia (lefamulin).

Composite Inflammatory Indicators as Early Predictor of Intra-abdominal Infections after General Surgery.

ObjectiveTo identify rapid and accurate early diagnostic indicators for intra-abdominal infection (IAI) after general surgery.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 3,810 general surgical patients in our hospital from August 2017 to July 2018. The predictive value of PCT, CRP, TNFα, and IL6 on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 3 and composite indicators for complicated IAIs among surgical patients was clarified.ResultsThere were 271 patients in the infected group and 614 patients in the uninfected group using IAI diagnostic criteria in this study. CRP, PCT, TNFα, and IL6 in the infected group were significantly higher than the uninfected group on POD1 and POD3. In the infected group, the composition of the four indicators on POD1 (AUC 0.819) and POD3 (AUC 0.848) showed higher predictive efficiency than the individual indicators (AUC 0.670–0.805).ConclusionThe composite of CRP, PCT, TNFα, and IL6 can be used as a predictor of postoperative abdominal infectious complications with high sensitivity and specificity on POD1 and POD3, which can provide a basis for early diagnosis of postoperative abdominal infectious complications.

Clinical management of cUTI, cIAI, and HABP/VABP attributable to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections in Spain.

IntroductionCarbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CRGN) infections are a major public health problem in Spain, often implicated in complicated, healthcare-associated infections that require the use of potentially toxic antibacterial agents of last resort. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical management of complicated infections caused by CRGN bacteria in Spanish hospitals.MethodsThe study included: 1) a survey assessing the GN infection and antibacterial susceptibility profile in five participating Spanish hospitals and 2) a non-interventional, retrospective single cohort chart review of 100 patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), or hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/ VABP) attributable to CRGN pathogens.ResultsIn the participating hospitals CRGN prevalence was 9.3% amongst complicated infections. In the retrospective cohort, 92% of infections were healthcare-associated, and Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common pathogens. OXA was the most frequently detected carbapenemase type (71.4%). We found that carbapenems were frequently used to treat cUTI, cIAI, HABP/VABP caused by CRGN pathogens. Carbapenem use, particularly in combination with other agents, persisted after confirmation of carbapenem resistance. Clinical cure was 66.0%, mortality during hospitalization 35.0%, mortality at the time of chart review 62.0%, and 6-months-post-discharge readmission 47.7%.ConclusionOur results reflect the high burden and unmet needs associated with the management of complicated infections attributable to CRGN pathogens in Spain and highlight the urgent need for enhanced clinical management of these difficult-to-treat infections.

A retrospective, multicentre evaluation of eravacycline utilisation in community and academic hospitals

Eravacycline is a novel, fully-synthetic tetracycline approved by the FDA for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in August 2018. This study sought to characterise early clinical experience with this novel antibiotic. Eravacycline utilisation for 66 patients was retrospectively evaluated. Eravacycline was used as monotherapy in 62.1% of cases. Mean duration of therapy was 13.1 ± 9.9 days. The majority (68.2%) of treatment was for off-label indications, including 34.8% for pulmonary and 28.8% for skin/soft tissue infections. A number of difficult-to-treat organisms were encountered: 50% of identified Gram-negative pathogens were resistant to carbapenems in vitro; and 48% of identified Gram-positive pathogens were resistant to vancomycin in vitro. The patient population had a high illness acuity, with 42.4% requiring ICU admission, 59.1% having ≥2 co-morbidities and 33.3% having ≥3 co-morbidities. Nevertheless, 95.5% experienced clinical improvement, with 86.4% achieving full infection resolution following eravacycline. Three patients who did not experience clinical improvement had an intra-abdominal source of infection without adequate source control. The remaining six who did not experience full infection resolution died from unrelated non-infectious causes during hospital admission. Adverse events were uncommon (4.5%), limited to nausea/vomiting, and not leading to eravacycline discontinuation. Although two patients had a history of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), no patients developed CDI while receiving eravacycline. These results illustrate the potential versatility of eravacycline with a broad activity spectrum, good safety and tolerability profile, flexibility for use in patients with renal injury or antibiotic allergies, and positive clinical outcomes in this real-world cohort.

The clinical aspects of peritonitis developing after cystectomy

Background. Surgical morbidities of radical cystectomy, which are, as a rule, complicated intraabdominal infections, appear to be the main causes of repeated surgeries and fatal outcomes. The elimination of the infection Indus and an-timicrobic therapy are the currently accepted standard of treatment for postoperative peritonitis in cancer urology, as well as in general surgery hospital.Objective: defining the most reasonable option of surgical aid for peritonitis developing after cystectomy.Materials and methods. In the time period from 2000 through 2014, 58 cancer patients with postoperative peritonitis developing after cystectomy received indoor treatment at N.N. Alexandrov Republican Research and Practical Center for Oncology and Medical Radiology. Their mean age was 64.9 years, the range 44-90 years, 53 (91.4 %) of them being male. Primary urinary bladder cancer was present in 51 (87.9 %) patients. Peritoneal infection was microbiologically verified in 57 (98.3 %) patients. Each case of fatal outcome was associated with ineffective treatment of peritonitis. Depending on the intraoperative findings (presence or absence of a hollow organ defect) and the surgical approach undertaken (obstructive resection or operation maintaining the continuity of the intestinal and/or urinary tract), the patients were stratified into three groups: group 1 (n = 28), group 2 (n = 20) and group 3 (n = 10). There were no significant differences in the basic parameters specifying peritoneal infection severity between the patients of groups 1 and 2 vs group 3 (p &gt;0.05).Results. Overall mortality amounted to 25.9 %, 15 patients died. Among the 28 (48.3 %) patients (group 1) who underwent obstructive elimination of the peritonitis focus by means of urointestinal reservoir ablation, resection of small or large intestine with ileo- or colostomy, 6 patients died, mortality 21.4 %. In the 10 (17.2 %) patients (group 3) who succeeded in preserving the urinary conduit or continuity of the bowels by anastomosis defect closure, resection of enteroentero-anastomosis or urointestinal reservoir with repeated anastomosing or defect closure, mortality was higher (60 %) (p = 0.045); 6 patients died.Conclusion. The most effective option of surgical treatment of postoperative peritonitis developing after cystectomy is obstructive reoperation on the bowels and urinary tracts: compared with the intervention consisting in preserving the urinary conduit and/or continuity of the intestinal tract, this type of surgery caused a 2.8-fold lower mortality.

Early supplemental parenteral nutrition is associated with reduced mortality in critically ill surgical patients with high nutritional risk

Adequate nutritional provision is important for critically ill patients to improve clinical outcomes. Starting enteral nutrition (EN) as early as possible is recommended and preferred to parenteral nutrition (PN). However, patients who undergo emergency abdominal operations may have alterations in their intra-abdominal environment and gastrointestinal motility leading to limitation in starting an enteral diet. Therefore, our study was designed to evaluate the benefit of early supplemental PN to achieve adequate calorie and protein supply in critically ill patients undergoing surgery who are not eligible for early EN. We reviewed the medical records of 317 patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) between January 2013 and December 2018. The nutritional data of the patients were collected for 7 days in maximum, starting on the day of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The patients were divided by low or high malnutrition risk using the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score and body mass index. The low- and high-risk groups were subdivided into the following two categories: those who received PN within 48h ("early") and those who did not ("usual"). Data regarding the baseline characteristics, initial severity of illness, morbidity, and mortality rates were also obtained. The average calorie and protein supply per day were calculated in these groups. Patients in all groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics, initial status, and infectious complications. In terms of outcomes, patients with low malnutrition risk had no significant difference in mortality. However, among patients with high malnutrition risk, the "Early" group had lower rates of 30-day mortality (7.6% vs. 26.7%, p=0.006) and in-hospital mortality (13.6% vs. 28.9%, p=0.048) than those of the "Usual" group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for 30-day mortality in these groups also showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.001). The caloric adequacy of the "Early" group and the "Usual" group were 0.88±0.34 and 0.6±0.29, respectively. Amounts of protein received were 0.94±0.39g/kg in the "Early" group and 0.47±0.34g/kg in the "Usual" group, respectively. There was no significant difference in infectious complications between both groups. Mortality in patients with high malnutrition risk who received early PN supply within 48h after emergency surgery for cIAI was lower than those who did not receive PN earlier. PN may be necessary to fulfill the caloric and protein requirements for critically ill patients who cannot achieve their nutritional requirements to the fullest with EN alone.

Activity of the Novel Aminomethylcycline KBP-7072 and Comparators against 1,057 Geographically Diverse Recent Clinical Isolates from the SENTRY Surveillance Program, 2019.

ABSTRACTKBP-7072 is a novel broad-spectrum tetracycline (aminomethylcycline) antibacterial in clinical development (oral and intravenous formulations) for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and complicated intra-abdominal infections. KBP-7072 is active against many of the World Health Organization priority pathogens. In this study, KBP-7072 and tetracycline class comparators were susceptibility tested against 1,057 geographically diverse surveillance isolates from 2019 according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. KBP-7072 demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. KBP-7072 was active against Staphylococcus aureus (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/liter), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/liter), S. lugdunensis (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.03 mg/liter), and other coagulase-negative staphylococci (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.25 mg/liter). KBP-7072 was active against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/liter) and vancomycin-susceptible and -nonsusceptible E. faecium (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.03 mg/liter); Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC50/90, ≤0.015/0.03 mg/liter), including penicillin- and tetracycline-resistant strains; S. agalactiae (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/liter), including macrolide-resistant strains; S. pyogenes (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.03 mg/liter); and viridans group streptococci, including S. anginosus group (MIC50/90, ≤0.015/0.03 mg/liter) isolates. KBP-7072 inhibited 90.2% (MIC50/90, 0.25/2 mg/liter) of all Enterobacterales isolates, including expanded-spectrum β-lactamase-phenotype strains at ≤2 mg/liter. KBP-7072 demonstrated potent activity against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus species complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates (MIC50/90 values, 0.5/1 mg/liter), Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/liter; 100.0% inhibited at ≤0.25 mg/liter), and Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06 mg/liter). Based on MIC90 values, KBP-7072 in vitro activity was generally superior to that the other tetracycline class comparators tested. The potent activity of KBP-7072, including resistant organism groups, merits further clinical investigation in infections where these organisms are likely to occur.

Інтраабдомінальна інфекція у світлі останніх міжнародних рекомендацій та її роль у розвитку септичної енцефалопатії

Мета цих рекомендацій: представити міжнародну позицію, засновану на доказах, із питань застосування методів ведення внутрішньоабдомінальних інфекцій та вплив внутрішньоабдомінальних інфекцій на розвиток септичної енцефалопатії. Ускладнена інтраабдомінальна інфекція є важливою причиною захворюваності та смертності. В уявленні Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) сепсис визначається як загрозлива для життя дисфункція органа, що викликана дисрегуляторною відповіддю хазяїна на інфекцію. Дисфункція органа може бути подана як збільшення показника на більше ніж 2 бала за шкалою Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). Раннє виявлення пацієнтів з абдомінальним сепсисом є важливим кроком для ефективного лікування з метою покращання результатів. Мікросудинна дисфункція, глобальне пошкодження тканин можуть призвести до розвитку септичної енцефалопатії, що асоціюється з поганим прогнозом. Ключовими факторами ефективної терапії внутрішньоабдомінальних інфекцій є оперативний діагноз, адекватна реанімація, ранній початок відповідної антибактеріальної терапії, ранній конт­роль джерела інфекції та постійна переоцінка клінічної відповіді на тактику ведення. Оцінка ефективності рекомендацій та якості доказів подані відповідно до Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Ceftolozane-tazobactam: When, how and why using it?

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is currently the most active antipseudomonal agent, including multidrug-resistant extensively drug-resistant strains. Tazobactam provides additional activity against many extended-spectrum beta-lactamases Enterobacterales. Ceftolozane-tazobactam is formally approved for complicated urinary tract infection, complicated intra-abdominal infection, and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. The clinical and microbiological success is over 70-80% in many series. However, resistant mutants to ceftolozane-tazobactam have been already described. Combination therapies with colistin or meropenem could be among the strategies to avoid the resistance emergence.

Review of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that causes a range of serious infections that are often challenging to treat, as this pathogen can express multiple resistance mechanisms, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes. Ceftazidime–avibactam is a combination antimicrobial agent comprising ceftazidime, a third-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin, and avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor. This review explores the potential role of ceftazidime–avibactam for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftazidime–avibactam has good in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa relative to comparator β-lactam agents and fluoroquinolones, comparable to amikacin and ceftolozane–tazobactam. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ceftazidime–avibactam has generally demonstrated similar clinical and microbiological outcomes to comparators in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections or hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa. Although real-world data are limited, favourable outcomes with ceftazidime–avibactam treatment have been reported in some patients with MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Thus, ceftazidime–avibactam may have a potentially important role in the management of serious and complicated P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by MDR and XDR strains.

Complicated carbapenem-resistant infections: a treatment pathway analysis in Italian sites.

Efforts to curb a growing prevalence of carbapenem resistance are prominent worldwide and especially in countries where high levels of carbapenem resistance are reported, such as Italy. Complicated infections, including complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), and hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP), are often caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CRGN) bacteria and as such, these infection sites and their causative bacteria are important areas of focus for healthcare practitioners seeking to follow good antimicrobial stewardship practices. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical management and associated clinical and economic outcomes of patients with cUTI, cIAI, and HABP/VABP resulting from CRGN bacteria in Italy. We first conducted a hospital survey focusing on Gram-negative infections and their antibacterial susceptibility profile in four participating Italian hospitals. The second part of the study involved a non-interventional, retrospective single cohort chart review of 100 patients with cUTI, cIAI, or HABP/VABP caused by CRGN bacteria, in which patient characteristics, index hospitalization characteristics, infection characteristics, patient outcomes, treatment pathways, and healthcare resource use were assessed. The hospital survey demonstrated carbapenem resistance in approximately 17% of complicated infections, mostly associated with Acinetobacter baumannii. The non-interventional, retrospective cohort component showed that complicated CRGN infections were hospital- or healthcare-acquired in 99.0% of cases and were most often caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (66.0%). Despite the carbapenem-resistant nature of the included infections, carbapenems were used in 19.0% of patients as empirical therapy, in 43.0% as late empirical (i.e. immediately before receipt of susceptibility test results), and in 64.0% as targeted therapy (post-susceptibility test result receipt). Colistin was used in 61.0% of patients after susceptibility results were available. High clinical and economic burden was evident, with the average length of hospital stay being greater than 50 days, clinical cure achievement in only 43.0% of patients, and an overall mortality rate of 65.0% by the end of the follow-up period. Our results reflect the considerable burden associated with complicated CRGN infections in Italy and the limitations in current treatment strategies. Our study pinpoints potential areas for improvement. For example, regular and detailed local surveillance and state of the art microbial diagnostic capabilities might aid and hasten clinical decision-making and facilitate improved antimicrobial stewardship when treating complex CRGN infections. New therapeutic options which more appropriately address CRGN infections may assist in improving outcomes which are important to both patients and healthcare providers.

In vitro susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales to eravacycline – the first report from Croatia

The main obstacle in treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are limited treatment options. The novel antimicrobial agents other than β-lactams with activity not being dependent on β-lactamase class are especially important. Eravacycline (ERV) is the first fully synthetic fluorocycline indicated for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults. Eighty CRE isolates at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia were examined for susceptibility to ERV by disc diffusion method and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). Total of 54 (54/80; 67.5%) isolates were susceptible to ERV with MIC50 of ≤0.5 μg/mL and MIC90 of 4 μg/mL. Susceptibility of OXA-48 positive isolates was not significantly higher in comparison with NDM positive (P = 0.539) and VIM positive (P = 0.7805) isolates. ERV is possible alternative to novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for treatment of CRE infections with antimicrobial susceptibility testing of CRE isolate to ERV in particular patient as condicio sine qua non before administration.