You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Advanced (including Drug Therapy) II1 Apr 2017MP16-14 CLINICAL IMPLICATION OF METASTASECTOMY IN METACHRONOUS METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IN THE ERA OF TARGETED THERAPY Jong Won Kim, Jongsoo Lee, Jae Yong Jeong, Sung Ku Kang, Jang Hee Han, Seung Hwan Lee, Won Sik Ham, Koon Ho Rha, Young Deuk Choi, Sung Joon Hong, Young Eun Yoon, and Woong Kyu Han Jong Won KimJong Won Kim More articles by this author , Jongsoo LeeJongsoo Lee More articles by this author , Jae Yong JeongJae Yong Jeong More articles by this author , Sung Ku KangSung Ku Kang More articles by this author , Jang Hee HanJang Hee Han More articles by this author , Seung Hwan LeeSeung Hwan Lee More articles by this author , Won Sik HamWon Sik Ham More articles by this author , Koon Ho RhaKoon Ho Rha More articles by this author , Young Deuk ChoiYoung Deuk Choi More articles by this author , Sung Joon HongSung Joon Hong More articles by this author , Young Eun YoonYoung Eun Yoon More articles by this author , and Woong Kyu HanWoong Kyu Han More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.520AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical implication of complete and incomplete metastasectomy in the patients having metachronous metastatic RCC (mRCC). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed metachronous mRCC treated at our institute between January 2005 and December 2015. Metachronous mRCC was defined as those diagnosed of metastatic disease >3month after initial nephrectomy. Patients were classified into three groups; A. targeted therapy for metachronouc mRCC without additional surgical treatment. B. complete metastasectomy and adjuvant targeted therapy. C. incomplete metastasectomy and adjuvant targeted therapy. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to determine if complete and incomplete metastasectomy prolongs overall survival (OS) for the metachronous mRCC. RESULTS Total of 101 patients were enrolled and followed up for 41.9 months in this study. 22 patients (21.8%) underwent complete metastasectomy, while 17 patients (16.8%) underwent incomplete metastasectomy. Most commonly performed metastasectomy was lung wedge resection (n=14, 13.9%), followed by bone excision (n=9, 8.9%), and local recur resection (n=6, 5.9%). Overall, incomplete metastasectomy and complete metastasectomy prolonged OS (HR 0.608, 0.318, p=0.042, respectively). Complete and incomplete lung wedge resection both prolonged overall survival significantly (p<0.05). Metastasectomy for bone and retroperitoneum recurred mass both did not show survival benefit (p=0.590 and 0.133, respectively). For the other metastasis, we labeled them as soft tissue metastasis, and soft tissue metastasectomy prolonged OS (p=0.036). Incomplete metastasectomy for soft tissue prolonged OS (p=0.016) CONCLUSIONS Metastasectomy could prolong OS in metachronous mRCC. Except for metastasectomy for bone and retroperitoneum recurred mass, incomplete metastasectomy also could play a role as OS prolongation. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e185 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Jong Won Kim More articles by this author Jongsoo Lee More articles by this author Jae Yong Jeong More articles by this author Sung Ku Kang More articles by this author Jang Hee Han More articles by this author Seung Hwan Lee More articles by this author Won Sik Ham More articles by this author Koon Ho Rha More articles by this author Young Deuk Choi More articles by this author Sung Joon Hong More articles by this author Young Eun Yoon More articles by this author Woong Kyu Han More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract