ISSUE: Preparing for an influx of infectious patients has been a priority for Infection Control (IC) Professionals in recent years. After the devastating impact of storms and flooding following Hurricane Katrina, the Dallas area was faced with the arrival of thousands of displaced residents from hospitals, shelters, and the streets of New Orleans. PROJECT: On Aug 31, 2005, Dallas County hospitals were alerted to anticipate patient transfers from evacuating healthcare facilities (HCFs) in Louisiana. In the days that followed, the Dallas area received ∼13,000 evacuees displaced by flood waters. Methodist Health System's two-hospitals serving the Dallas County braced for arrival of patients with a potential for a variety of infections associated with exposure to contaminated floodwaters and close living quarters. IC initiated logs of hurricane evacuees in ED with daily notification to IC, cohorting of patients on a nursing unit, and empiric implementation of transmission-based precautions (droplet precautions for URI and contact precautions for diarrheal illness and those from other HCFs). Educational fact sheets outlining isolation protocols were distributed to nursing staff and compliance was monitored on daily rounds. RESULTS: Astute IC planning led to proper initiation of empiric transmission-based precautions and likely averted any nosocomial outbreak (despite confirmed Norovirus outbreak in the community shelter). However, staffing issues over the Labor Day weekend posed logistic challenges, with one facility unable to cohort evacuees on one unit, causing difficulty with daily surveillance rounds and maintenance of ongoing logs. While one hospital maintained electronic logs, the other facility had multiple paper logs, which made it challenging to comply with the ever-changing notification requests of the public health officials. Patient follow-up proved challenging as patients had registered using their home addresses, and discharge dispositions were frequently listed as shelter, church or hotel. LESSONS LEARNED: Plans must allow for unexpected situations and HCFs must be able to react and anticipate changes. Constant monitors must be put in place so that when the unexpected crisis happens, system would be less likely to crumble. Planning needs to include capabilities to collect current demographic data in the event that follow up for prophylaxis or treatment is needed. Consistency with data collection and surveillance tools is necessary. ISSUE: Preparing for an influx of infectious patients has been a priority for Infection Control (IC) Professionals in recent years. After the devastating impact of storms and flooding following Hurricane Katrina, the Dallas area was faced with the arrival of thousands of displaced residents from hospitals, shelters, and the streets of New Orleans. PROJECT: On Aug 31, 2005, Dallas County hospitals were alerted to anticipate patient transfers from evacuating healthcare facilities (HCFs) in Louisiana. In the days that followed, the Dallas area received ∼13,000 evacuees displaced by flood waters. Methodist Health System's two-hospitals serving the Dallas County braced for arrival of patients with a potential for a variety of infections associated with exposure to contaminated floodwaters and close living quarters. IC initiated logs of hurricane evacuees in ED with daily notification to IC, cohorting of patients on a nursing unit, and empiric implementation of transmission-based precautions (droplet precautions for URI and contact precautions for diarrheal illness and those from other HCFs). Educational fact sheets outlining isolation protocols were distributed to nursing staff and compliance was monitored on daily rounds. RESULTS: Astute IC planning led to proper initiation of empiric transmission-based precautions and likely averted any nosocomial outbreak (despite confirmed Norovirus outbreak in the community shelter). However, staffing issues over the Labor Day weekend posed logistic challenges, with one facility unable to cohort evacuees on one unit, causing difficulty with daily surveillance rounds and maintenance of ongoing logs. While one hospital maintained electronic logs, the other facility had multiple paper logs, which made it challenging to comply with the ever-changing notification requests of the public health officials. Patient follow-up proved challenging as patients had registered using their home addresses, and discharge dispositions were frequently listed as shelter, church or hotel. LESSONS LEARNED: Plans must allow for unexpected situations and HCFs must be able to react and anticipate changes. Constant monitors must be put in place so that when the unexpected crisis happens, system would be less likely to crumble. Planning needs to include capabilities to collect current demographic data in the event that follow up for prophylaxis or treatment is needed. Consistency with data collection and surveillance tools is necessary.
Read full abstract