IntroductionThe idea of was implemented approximately a century ago as purely civilian aspect of diplomacy, which aimed to inform foreign populations and citizens about goals of a given country's foreign policy through use of and programs.1 Within framework of Clausewitzian philosophy, which held that war continuation of politics by other means, was always linked to diplomatic realm, but was never part of it.2 On other hand, for a long time military meant simply business of attaches; their mission was to be the Nation's eye and ears abroad in days before satellite photography and sophisticated electronic collection techniques.3Along with changes that past several decades have seen in makeup of arena, particularly regarding new constellation of alliances, revised goals of foreign policies, and altered threat assumptions, content of public diplomacy has changed, and its targeted programs have expanded.4 At same time, understanding and definition of concept of security has changed since collapse of Iron Curtain and breakdown of Soviet Union. Nowadays, security is defined above all by notion of a comprehensive approach. Security is now viewed as a set of interconnections between civilian and means and approaches, while use of force remains a last resort. Therefore, programs and means from areas of and public diplomacy have received increased attention and have gained a more prominent status.For this reason, this essay will attempt to trace close relations of modern defense strategies, policies, and diplomacies. The guiding research question for this essay shall be, Is there in modern foreign affairs and defense policy a relation between diplomacy and public diplomacy? If so, what characterizes this relation? Along that line, this essay will examine nexus between public diplomacy and diplomacy, with assumption that relations and defense policies are aimed at overlapping areas, especially when it comes to diplomacy. The hypothesis therefore can be encapsulated thus: without naming it in official policy documents, and without a focused strategy, an area has recently developed where public diplomacy and diplomacy are proceeding in concert, with a common toolset. I will use German armed forces as a special case study in order to demonstrate that they have actually been practicing public diplomacy within their posture for decades.As a first step, essay will offer a general overview about idea, definitions, and different concepts of public diplomacy, which will provide basic background for further observations. In contrast, a brief examination of idea and concept of diplomacy will show approach from a different perspective. In a third step, essay will highlight common strategies and tools in order to display areas of overlap and similarity. Following these sections, essay will present two case studies of German Armed Forces, which will demonstrate hypothesis on foundation of observation drawn from first two steps. Finally, essay's conclusion will draw some general findings on relationship between public and diplomacy in our times.The Concept of Public DiplomacyPublic diplomacy is to some extent part of a traditional branch of diplomacy, one that refers to government sponsored-programs and initiatives that aim to influence and inform foreign audiences. These programs are also sometimes called international information or cultural programs. Usually these programs are used to transmit a certain message regarding a nation's foreign policy, political aims, economic cooperation efforts, or even touristic developments.It is inherent in concept of public diplomacy that addressees of activities carried out under its banner are mainly non-governmental actors. …