Combination Of Transarterial Chemoembolization Research Articles

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with molecular targeted agents plus immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the up-to-seven criteria: a propensity score-matching analysis

Purpose Not all patients benefit from transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) due to the heterogeneity of the tumour burden in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To compare the outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with molecular-targeted agents plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (TACE-MTAs-ICIs) with those of TACE for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) that were beyond the up-to-seven criteria. Patients and methods Between January 2019 and July 2022, 130 patients diagnosed with uHCC beyond the up-to-seven criteria were retrospectively identified, including 47 patients who received TACE-MTAs-ICIs and 83 patients who received TACE alone. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoints included tumour response and adverse events (AEs). Results There were 43 matched patients. The median OS and PFS times in the TACE-MTAs-ICIs group were significantly longer than those in the TACE group (OS: 27.2 vs. 15.9 months, p = 0.007; PFS: 15.4 months vs. 4.8 months, p < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) in the TACE-MTAs-ICIs group was higher than that in the TACE group (65.1% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.010). Reversible AEs (grade 3 or 4) occurred differently in TACE-MTAs-ICIs and TACE groups (83.7% vs. 51.2%, p = 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that TACE-MTAs-ICIs treatment was an independent favourable prognostic factor for both PFS and OS (p < 0.001). Conclusion For uHCC patients beyond the up-to-seven criteria, TACE-MTAs-ICIs provided superior ORR and OS. Early combined TACE and systemic treatment should shift for patients who are beyond these criteria.

The combination of transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation is superior to microwave ablation alone for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) with MWA alone in treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC).Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 251 patients with unresectable and not to chemotherapy responding LMCRC were included. Group A consisted of 184 patients (104 male and 80 females; mean age: 64 ± 11.4 years) with 442 metastases who received a combination of TACE and MWA. A total of 67 patients (49 male and 18 females; mean age: 63.2 ± 11.8 years) with 173 metastases patients were included in group B, who received only MWA. Parameters assessed were local tumor progression (LTP), hepatic distant tumor progression (hDTP), hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe rate of LTP was 4.9% in group A and 4.5% in group B (p-value: 0.062). The rate of hDTP was 71.7% and 83.6% for groups A and B (p-value: 0.81), respectively. The mean hPFS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.9–16.8) for group A and 8.1 months (95% CI 6.1–10.1) for group B (p-value: 0.03). The median OS time for group A was 30 months (95% CI 26–34), with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 84.2%, 61.1%, 40.8% and 31.3%, respectively. In group B however, the median OS time was 26 months (95% CI 18–34) with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 82.3%, 53.2%, 34.6% and 28.2%, respectively (p-value: 0.67).ConclusionThe combination therapy of TACE and MWA is superior to the monotherapy of MWA for LMCRC, especially regarding hDTP, hPFS and OS.

Combined transarterial chemoembolization and tislelizumab for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often presents as unresectable, necessitating effective treatment modalities. Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with immunotherapy and targeted therapy has shown promise, yet real-world evidence is needed. To investigate effectiveness and safety of TACE with tislelizumab ± targeted therapy for unresectable HCC in real-world setting. This retrospective study included patients with unresectable HCC receiving combined treatment of TACE and tislelizumab. The clinical outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). All patients were evaluated according to the mRECIST criteria. The adverse event (AE) was also assessed. In this study of 56 patients with median follow-up of 10.9 months, 7 had previous immunotherapy. Tislelizumab was administered before TACE in 21 (37.50%) and after in 35 (62.50%) patients, with 91.07% receiving concurrent targeted therapy. Median PFS was 14.0 (95%CI: 7.0-18.00) months, and OS was 28 (95%CI: 2.94-53.05) months. Patients with prior immunotherapy had shorter PFS (6 vs. 18 months, P = 0.006). Overall ORR and DCR were 82.14% and 87.50%. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs included increased alanine aminotransferase (8.93%), aspartate aminotransferase (10.71%), and total bilirubin (3.57%). The combination of TACE and tislelizumab, with or without targeted therapy, demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in unresectable HCC, especially in immunotherapy-naive patients, warranting further prospective validation studies.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with sintilimab and lenvatinib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) challenging due to unfulfilled clinical requirements.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with sintilimab and lenvatinib in the treatment of uHCC.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with uHCC who were treated with a combination of TACE, sintilimab, and lenvatinib between May 2019 and December 2021 at the Chinese PLA General Hospital. Systemic treatment was started 1 week after TACE was performed. Sintilimab was administered intravenously at a dosage of 200 mg every three weeks, and lenvatinib was given orally at dosages of 8 mg or 12 mg daily, contingent upon the weight of the patients. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) as per the mRECIST. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (tr-AEs).ResultsA total of 32 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 9 patients were classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B (BCLC-B), 23 patients were classified as BCLC-C, 14 patients diagnosed with portal vein tumors, and 12 patients were diagnosed with extra hepatic metastases. The ORR and DCR were 75% and 90.6% respectively, with 4 patients exhibiting (12.5%) complete response, 20 patients exhibiting (62.5%) partial response, 5 patients exhibiting (15.6%) stable disease, and 3 patients exhibiting (9.4%) progressive disease. With a median follow-up time of 19.6 months, the median PFS was 9.9 months, and the median OS was 33.3 months. A total of 31 patients experienced different degrees of tr-AEs, of which 2 were grade 3 tr-AEs.ConclusionThe combination therapy of TACE, sintilimab, and lenvatinib demonstrates satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of uHCC with manageable tr-AEs.

Combination Therapy Consisting of Transarterial Chemoembolization, Lenvatinib, and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Blockade for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus: A Case Series Study and Literature Review

Introduction: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT) have poor prognosis. Combination therapy involving the blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors is an efficient treatment strategy for advanced HCC. However, surgical treatment after a combination of systemic therapy and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for HCC with IVCTT has not been widely reported, and the efficacy and safety of this treatment have not been studied. Methods: In the 21 cases reported herein, the patients were treated with TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 blockade. The treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and toxicities were evaluated, and the related literature was reviewed. Results: The overall response and disease control rates were 66.7% and 85.7%, respectively. The median PFS time was 16.0 months, with a 1-year PFS rate of 55.60%. The median OS was not reached, with a 1-year OS rate of 66.70%. Four patients underwent hepatectomy without serious complications and survived for 29.1, 24.7, 14.2, and 13.8 months. Three patients survived tumor-free, and 1 patient experienced intrahepatic recurrence. Pathological complete response and major pathological responses were observed in 1 and 3 patients, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 8/9 patients (88.9%), and grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 1 patient. Conclusion: The combination of TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 is effective for HCC with IVCTT and has acceptable adverse effects.

Neoadjuvant therapy of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib for single huge hepatocellular carcinoma (NEO-START): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe high recurrence rate after liver resection emphasizes the urgent need for neoadjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to enhance the overall prognosis for patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, camrelizumab combined with an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) apatinib, have emerged as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC, yet its neoadjuvant application in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant therapy for single, huge HCC.MethodsThis multi-center, open-label randomized phase 3 trial will be conducted at 7 tertiary hospitals. Patients with single huge (≥ 10 cm in diameter), resectable HCC will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to arm of surgery alone or arm of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. In the neoadjuvant therapy group, patients will receive TACE within 1 week after randomization, followed by camrelizumab (200 mg q2w, 4 cycles), along with apatinib (250 mg qd, 2 months). Patients will receive liver resection after neoadjuvant therapy unless the disease is assessed as progressive. The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 1 year. The planned sample size of 60 patients will be calculated to permit the accumulation of sufficient RFS events in 1 year to achieve 80% power for the RFS primary endpoint.DiscussionSynergistic effects provided by multimodality therapy of locoregional treatment, TKI, and anti-programmed cell death 1 inhibitor significantly improved overall survival for patients with unresectable HCC. Our trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination of TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant strategy for huge, resectable HCC.Trial registrationwww.chitr.org.cn ChiCTR2300078086. Registered on November 28, 2023. Start recruitment: 1st January 2024. Expected completion of recruitment: 15th June 2025.

Efficacy of lenvatinib and transarterial chemoembolization combination therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma administered an insufficient dose of early lenvatinib.

Recently, the relationship between the relative dose intensity (RDI) and efficacy was demonstrated for lenvatinib therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a higher RDI of lenvatinib monotherapy indicating a higher efficacy. However, not every patient can tolerate a high RDI during the course of treatment; therefore, add-on combination therapy may be necessary for patients requiring a low RDI. The addition of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to lenvatinib therapy improves clinical outcomes. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of lenvatinib plus TACE (the LEN-TACE group) with those of lenvatinib alone (the LEN group) in patients with unresectable HCC with a high- or low-RDI. A total of 66 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled in the present retrospective study. Eligible patients were those who initiated lenvatinib monotherapy between April 2018 and September 2020. Of these patients, 29 had an 8-week RDI of ≥60%, 6 of which received LEN-TACE. A further 37 patients had an 8-week RDI of <60%, 7 of which received LEN-TACE. In the high-RDI group, both the radiological evaluations and the overall survival (OS) time were improved in those in the low-RDI group. In addition, the median OS of patients treated with LEN-TACE was longer compared with that of patients treated with lenvatinib alone in the low-RDI group (P=0.0467). Therefore, the results of the present study revealed that early TACE should be considered instead of continuing lenvatinib only treatment in patients receiving an insufficient dose of lenvatinib, such as those with an 8-week RDI of <60%.

Bridge Therapy before Liver Transplant for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary liver tumor. Orthotopic liver transplant is one of the best treatment options, but its waiting list has to be considered. Bridge therapies have been introduced in order to limit this issue. The aim of this study is to evaluate if bridge therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma can improve overall survival and reduce de-listing. We selected 185 articles. The search was limited to English articles involving only adult patients. These were deduplicated and articles with incomplete text or irrelevant conclusions were excluded. Sorafenib is the standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increases overall survival without any significant drug toxicity. However, its survival benefit is limited. The combination of transarterial chemoembolization + sorafenib, instead, delays tumor progression, although its survival benefit is still uncertain. A few studies have shown that patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization + radiation therapy have similar or even better outcomes than those undergoing transarterial chemoembolization or sorafenib alone for rates of histopathologic complete response (89% had no residual in the explant). Also, the combined therapy of transarterial chemoembolization + radiotherapy + sorafenib was compared to the association of transarterial chemoembolization + radiotherapy and was associated with a better survival rate (24 vs. 17 months). Moreover, immunotherapy revealed new encouraging perspectives. Combination therapies showed the most encouraging results and could become the gold standard as a bridge to transplant for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Meta-analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined with cryoablation vs transarterial chemoembolization alone for ≥ 5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks sixth globally in cancer incidence and third in mortality rates. Unfortunately, over 70% of HCC patients forego the opportunity for curative surgery or liver transplantation due to inadequate physical examinations, poor physical condition, and limited organ availability upon diagnosis. Clinical guidelines endorse transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as the frontline treatment for intermediate to advanced-stage HCC. Cryoablation (CRA) is an emerging local ablative therapy increasingly used in HCC management. Recent studies suggest that combining CRA with TACE offers complementary and synergistic effects, potentially improving long-term survival rates. However, the superiority of combined TACE + CRA therapy over TACE alone for HCC lesions equal to or exceeding 5 cm requires further investigation. To compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with CRA vs TACE alone in the treatment of HCC with a diameter of ≥ 5 cm. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched to retrieve all relevant studies on TACE and CRA up to July 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. After screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 6 articles were included, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 4 nonrandomized controlled trials, with a total of 575 patients included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the objective response rate [odds ratio (OR) = 2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.66-3.96, P < 0.0001), disease control rate (OR = 3.03, 95%CI: 1.88-4.89, P < 0.00001), 1-year survival rate (OR = 3.79, 95%CI: 2.50-5.76, P < 0.00001), 2-year survival rate (OR = 2.34, 95%CI: 1.43-3.85, P = 0.0008), and 3-year survival rate (OR = 3.34, 95%CI: 1.61-6.94, P = 0.001) were all superior to those of the control group; the postoperative decrease in alpha-fetoprotein value (OR = 295.53, 95%CI: 250.22-340.85, P < 0.0001), the postoperative increase in CD4 value (OR = 10.59, 95%CI: 8.78-12.40, P < 0.00001), and the postoperative decrease in CD8 value (OR = 6.47, 95%CI: 4.44-8.50, P < 0.00001) were also significantly higher than those in the TACE-alone treatment group. Compared with TACE-alone treatment, TACE + CRA combined treatment not only improves the immune function of HCC patients with a diameter of ≥ 5 cm, but also enhances the therapeutic efficacy and long-term survival rate, without increasing the risk of complications. Therefore, TACE + CRA combined treatment may be a more recommended treatment for patients with HCC with a diameter of ≥ 5 cm.

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who require multiple transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatments in quick succession and prediction of outcome.

e16208 Background: TACE has been one of the standard treatments for intermediate-stage HCC patients for over 20 years. The outcome of patients from TACE treatment is variable as the result of the differences in tumor burden, liver function, and comorbidities. Given the advancement made in systemic therapies for advanced-stage HCC, and emerging data on the combination of TACE and immunotherapy, there is an unmet need to identify patients with intermediate-stage HCC who may benefit from early introduction of systemic therapy. The purpose of the study is to identify clinical factors that predict poorer outcomes in patients who receive TACE treatment. Methods: This retrospective analysis is a single-institutional study involving patients from MedStar Georgetown University Hospital. The investigation includes 167 individuals diagnosed with HCC who underwent TACE from 2007 to 2021. The data compiled for analysis encompassed patient demographics, clinical features, risk factors, and treatment outcomes. The log-rank test is used to test whether there is a difference between the survival times of different groups. Results: 167 HCC patients, with 105 in intermediate/advanced BCLC stages B and C were included. The cohort, with a median age of 62, comprised 128 males and 43 females. Cirrhosis was seen in 83% of patients mostly due to viral etiology. Hepatitis C (58%) and hepatitis B (13%) were common, with 4% having both. The remaining 24% had cirrhosis from metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The median overall survival (OS) durations for patients in BCLC-A (n = 62), BCLC-B (n = 64), and BCLC-C (n = 41) stages who underwent TACE as a component of their comprehensive treatment strategy were 67.9, 29.7, and 30.6 months, respectively (P = 0.035). In 64 subjects with BCLC stage B disease, patients who received 3 or more TACE treatments had higher OS (43.6 months) than those with two or fewer treatments (25.4 months, P = 0.042). Among the patients who had 2 or fewer TACE treatments, 6 patients had liver decompensation and discontinued treatment and 21 patients developed cancer progression and went on to receive systemic therapy. The median time to progression from the last TACE treatment was 5 months. Interestingly, among the patients who received 3 or more TACE treatments, 10 patients who had 3 or more TACE treatments within 6 months from the 1st TACE treatment had an mOS of 25.8 months while 25 patients who had 3 or more TACE treatments over a time span more than 6 months had a mOS of 49.4 months (P = 0.0186). Conclusions: Rapid disease progression in 6 months from the start of TACE treatment was predictive of aggressive tumor biology, and these patients may benefit from the early introduction to systemic therapy. Molecular biomarkers used to predict aggressive tumor biology are an unmet need for selecting patients to receive the combination of TACE and systemic therapy.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with donafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A real-world clinical study.

e16145 Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Donafenib, which is as a new tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy recommended by the China liver cancer staging (CNLC) system for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study on patients diagnosed with uHCC treated by TACE plus Donafenib as the first-line therapy between May 2021 and September 2023 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. The primary outcomes evaluated in this study were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Local response, one-year survival rate, safety and tolerability were the secondary outcomes. Results: All of 48 eligible patients by August, 2023, with the median age of 59 years. The clinical characteristics were as follows: BCLC stage A:2 (4.2%), B:16 (33.3%), and C:30 (62.5%); Child-Pugh class A:33 (68.8%) and B:15 (31.2%); ECOG PS 0: 27 (56.2%) and 1: 21 (43.7%). In this study, 10 (20.8%) patients had huge intrahepatic lesions, 15 (31.2%) subjects exhibited extrahepatic metastases at multiple sites, 19 (42.2%) patients presented with portal vein tumor thrombus, and 4 patients were diffuse-type HCC.107 TACE sessions were performed. Three patients had liver transplantation as frequent therapy, and histopathological examination of tissue from these subjects revealed complete necrotic foci. The median PFS was 12.8 months (95% CI: 8.66–NA) , mOS was not reached and the one-year OS rate was 87.5% (95% CI: 77%-97%) in the survival results. The tumor objective response rate was 58.3% with 14.5% complete response and 43.7% partial response based on mRECIST assessment. The disease control rate of the study group was 81.3%. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) observed were elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels (75.0%), increase in bilirubin level (72.9%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (54.2%), hand-foot syndrome (53.1%), diarrhea (29.1%), rashes (22.9%), hair loss (18.4%) and hypertension (12.5%). Twenty-three (46.9%) patients presented with grade 3 or 4 TRAEs including elevated AST levels (22.4%), elevated ALT levels (16.3%), increase in bilirubin level (4%), diarrhea (4%) and hypertension (2%). No Grade 5 TRAEs were observed. Conclusions: The combination of TACE and Donafenib presented good efficacy and tolerability, which could be potentially used as the first-line treatment of Chinese uHCC patients.

CRAFITY score benefits hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization and lenvatinib

AbstractBackgroundThe CRAFITY score serves as a simple and effective predictive model for individuals diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and subjected to treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atez/Bev). However, no large sample size studies have reported the application of the CRAFITY score among HCC patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in conjunction with lenvatinib. This research aims to assess the prognostic role of the CRAFITY score in the context of individuals with HCC receiving TACE in combination with lenvatinib.MethodsThis retrospective analysis encompassed 314 individuals diagnosed with HCC who underwent the combination of TACE and lenvatinib at two medical facilities in China from August 2019 to August 2022 (comprising a training cohort of n = 172 and a validation cohort of n = 142). We investigated the prognostic values of overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), disease control rate, and objective response rate in the training cohort based on the CRAFITY scores. Furthermore, the predictive capacity of the model was corroborated through validation using an external cohort.ResultsWe included 174 and 142 patients treated with TACE plus lenvatinib in the training and validation cohorts, correspondingly. PFS and OS differed across all three groups in all training and validation cohorts, based on the CRAFITY score (p &lt; 0.001). In both cohorts, the CRAFITY score effectively predicted tumor response (p &lt; 0.001). Moreover, among the 121 patients who received TACE, lenvatinib, and immunotherapy, the CRAFITY score showed promising predictive efficacy in PFS and OS.ConclusionsThe CRAFITY score, utilizing C‐reactive protein and alpha‐fetoprotein values, emerges as a dependable and pragmatic instrument for forecasting the effectiveness of TACE plus lenvatinib in individuals with unresectable HCC. This scoring system holds the potential to assist oncologists in making informed clinical decisions.

170P Efficacy of the combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and immunotherapy of atezolizumab + bevacizumab in patients before liver resection and transplantation (OTP) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

170P Efficacy of the combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and immunotherapy of atezolizumab + bevacizumab in patients before liver resection and transplantation (OTP) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Assessment of safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with camrelizumab and donafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at BCLC stage C: A study of 20 cases.

Camrelizumab, donafenib, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are recommended for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but their combined efficacy remains unclear. From July 2021 to January 2023, 20 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C HCC patients were prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, Child-Pugh Score ≤ 7, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B or C. Surgical candidates were excluded. The treatment included TACE, camrelizumab, and donafenib. Endpoints were median overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events (AEs) related to donafenib. Among 20 patients, 85% experienced AEs from targeted therapy and programmed cell death protein-1, with 40% having grade 3 AEs. No grade 4 or 5 AEs occurred. Median follow-up was 9 months, with 15% achieving complete response, 65% partial response, and 15% stable disease. Disease control rate was 90%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9 and 14 months, respectively. TACE, camrelizumab, and donafenib combination therapy in Chinese advanced HCC patients show effectiveness in extending survival with low severe AEs incidence.

Clinical efficacy of lenvatinib, trans-arterial chemoembolization, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Currently, the effectiveness of TACE, Lenvatinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors used alone or in combination has been thoroughly reported. However, the differences in effectiveness between these treatment protocols require further verification. To this end, this study employs a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE, Lenvatinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors, whether administered by monotherapy or in combination, providing evidence-based medicine for the treatment of unresectable HCC. This study employed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), Programmed Cell Death Protein/Ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitors, and Lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced HCC. Literature on the treatment of advanced HCC with TACE, PD-1/L1 inhibitors, and Lenvatinib was searched for in both Chinese and English databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang. Two researchers conducted independent screening and data extraction, and the meta-analysis was performed using R language with the gemtc package. After retrieval and screening, a total of 21 articles were included, involving 2052 participants and six treatment modalities: Lenvatinib (L), TACE (T), TACE + Lenvatinib (TL), Lenvatinib + PD-1/L1 inhibitors (LP), TACE + Lenvatinib + PD-1/L1 inhibitors (TLP), and TACE + PD-1/L1 inhibitors (TP). In terms of objective response rate (ORR), the TLP regimen provided the optimal effect. In predicting the best ORR, TLP had the highest (75.5%) probability. In terms of disease control rate (DCR), the TLP regimen showed the best effect. In predicting the best DCR, the TLP again offered the highest (76.1%) probability. In terms of overall survival (OS), the best outcome was observed in the TLP protocol. In predicting the best OS, the TLP holds the highest (86.00%) probability. Furthermore, the best outcome in progression-free survival (PFS) was found in the TLP regimen. In predicting the best PFS, the TLP still holds the highest (97.0%) result. The combination of TACE, Lenvatinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors appears to provide the maximum benefit for inoperable HCC patients.

Evaluation of models to predict prognosis in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE combined with apatinib.

The HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI scores have been substantiated as reliable prognostic markers in patients presenting with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment. Given this premise, our research aims to assess the predictive efficacy of these models in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC receiving a combination of TACE and Apatinib. Additionally, we have conducted a meticulous comparative analysis of these four scoring systems to discern their respective predictive capacities and efficacies in combined therapy. Performing a retrospective analysis on the clinical data from 200 patients with intermediate and advanced HCC, we studied those who received TACE combined with Apatinib at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China between June 2018 and December 2022. To identify the factors affecting survival, the study performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, with calculations of four different scores: HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI. Lastly, Harrell's C-index was employed to compare the prognostic abilities of these scores. Cox proportional hazards model results revealed that the ALBI score, presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT, )and tumor size are independent determinants of prognostic survival. The Kaplan-Meier analyses showed significant differences in survival rates among patients classified by the HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI scoring methods. Of the evaluated systems, the HAP scoring demonstrated greater prognostic precision, with a Harrell's C-index of 0.742, surpassing the alternative models (P < 0.05). In addition, an analysis of the area under the AU-ROC curve confirms the remarkable superiority of the HAP score in predicting short-term survival outcomes. Our study confirms the predictive value of HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI scores in intermediate to advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving combined Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Apatinib therapy. Notably, the HAP model excels in predicting outcomes for this specific HCC subgroup.

Short-term efficacy of oxaliplatin as interventional therapy for liver cancer, and its effect on serum CD163 and AFU

Purpose: To investigate the short-term effectiveness of oxaliplatin in the interventional treatment of liver cancer, and its effect on serum CD163 and α-L-glucosidase (AFU). &#x0D; Methods: Eighty liver carcinoma patients treated in The Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China from January 2022 to January 2023 were allotted to 2 cohorts (each with 40 patients). Subjects in control group were treated with hepatic Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE), while study group was treated with combination of hepatic TACE and oxaliplatin. Efficacy, serological indicators, health status and cancer-related fatigue were determined and compared between both cohorts. &#x0D; Results: DCR was significantly higher in study group than in the control. There were significantly reduced post-treatment amounts of CYFRA21-1, CA125 and VGEF in the study cohort, relative to pre-treatment and control levels (p &lt; 0.05). Post-treatment values of CD4+/CD8+ and CD4+ were significantly low, relative to levels before treatment, while CD8+ in both groups were significantly increased after treatment (p &lt; 0.05). However, post-treatment T lymphocyte level was comparable in both groups. There was significantly higher post-treatment KPS score in study cohort than pre-treatment and control scores, but RPFS score was significantly reduced, relative to the corresponding pre-treatment and control scores. Post-treatment serum amounts of CD163 and AFU were significantly down-regulated in both cohorts, with lower levels in the study cohort. &#x0D; Conclusion: The combined use of liver TACE and oxaliplatin produces good clinical outcome in the treatment of liver cancer. It is beneficial in reducing serum levels of CD163 and AFU, inhibits proliferation of tumor cells, reduces tumor volume, and improves cancer prognosis in patients.

Combination of intrahepatic TARE and extrahepatic TACE to treat HCC patients with extrahepatic artery supply: A case series

PurposeThe aim of this study was to report the safety and tumor response rate of combined transarterial radioembolization (TARE) through the intrahepatic arteries and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) through the extrahepatic feeding arteries (EHFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsPatients with HCC, who had both intrahepatic and extrahepatic arterial supply visible on preinterventional multiphase CT and were treated between 2016 and 2021 with a combination of TACE and TARE on the same nodule, were retrospectively included. Epidemiological, clinical, biological, and radiological characteristics were recorded. Safety and tumor response were assessed at 6 months. ResultsNine patients (8 men, median age 62 years [IQR: 54–72 years]) were included. Seven patients had previous treatments on the target nodule (TARE: 5; TACE: 2). The median longest axis (LA) of the lesion was 70 mm (IQR: 60–79 mm). Three patients had portal vein invasion (VP3). The EHFA originated from the right diaphragmatic artery (n = 6), the right adrenal artery (n = 2), and the left gastric artery (n = 1). The LA of the tumor portion treated with TACE was 47 mm (range: 35–64 mm). The ratio between the LA of the entire lesion and the LA treated with TACE was 1.44 (range: 1.27–1.7). One major complication occurred: acute on chronic liver failure. Median follow-up was 23 months (range: 16–29 months). Seven patients underwent further treatment: on the same lesion (n = 2), on newly appeared nodules (n = 2), and systemic treatment (n = 3). At 6-month follow-up, seven patients showed a local objective response. Time-to-progression was 13 (3.5–19) months. ConclusionThe combination of TARE and extrahepatic TACE for HCC with both intrahepatic and extrahepatic arterial supplies seems feasible and safe. Further studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of these preliminary results.

Evaluation of the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation followed by adjuvant therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

This study aimed to explore the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) adjuvant to lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A retrospective analysis of 67 patients with HCC treated at our hospital between October 2018 and May 2022 was conducted. All patients underwent a combination of TACE and MWA. Among them, 29 received postoperative treatment with molecular-targeted agents, like lenvatinib, along with anti-PD-1 antibodies such as sindilizumab, karelizumab, or tirilizumab. The remaining 38 patients did not receive postoperative systemic therapies, like targeted or immunotherapy. The survival and prognosis of all patients were analyzed. Nine patients in the observation group and 29 patients in the control group experienced recurrence, and the median progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) was not reached 'Not Applicable'(NA) and 17.05 months (P=0.035), respectively. Failure to combine adjuvant therapy was identified as an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence, and the observation group had a 0.245 times lower risk of recurrence compared to that in the control group (P=0.005). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that the maximum tumor size, and tumor number were risk factors for tumor recurrence. Patients with a large maximum tumor size had a 1.519 times higher risk of recurrence compared to those with a small maximum tumor size (P=0.006), and patients with a large number of tumors had a 5.978 times higher risk of recurrence compared to those with a small number of tumors (P=0.02). The median PFS2 of the two groups was 11.795 and 21.257 months, respectively, though not statistically significant (P=0.955). However, there was a disparity in the percentage of BCLC stages associated with recurrence between the two groups. In the observation group approximately 22.22% of patients progressed to stage C, while in the control group, this proportion was 34.48%. The observation group exhibited a lower risk of distant metastasis compared to the control group. Adjuvant treatment of HCC following TACE combined with MWA improved PFS and achieved better clinical outcomes compared to that with TACE combined with MWA alone.

Prognostic Value of Pathological Response for Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Conversion Surgery

Plain Language SummaryThe combination of transarterial chemoembolization, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitor is an efficacious conversion therapy for uHCC. In this multicenter retrospective study, we discovered that PR was associated with the prognosis of patients who underwent conversion surgery. Predictors of MPR included neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and alpha-fetoprotein levels.