Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis And Emphysema Group Research Articles

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 as a potential biomarker for distinguishing combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A retrospective study

BackgroundThe presence of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is relatively common in patients with emphysema. This has been designated combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). CPFE had worse prognosis than emphysema alone. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels as a biomarker of alveolar type 2 epithelial cell injury, which is widely used to identify the presence of ILD, whether it can differentiate CPFE from COPD remains unknown. Methods259 patients from Xiangya Hospital with diagnosis of COPD, with or without ILD, and who had KL-6 tests were recruited for this retrospective analysis. Recorded data included demographic information, comorbidities, inflammatory biomarkers. Results of CT and pulmonary function tests were collected one week before or after KL-6 measurements. ResultsAmong 259 patients, 52 patients were diagnosed with CPFE. The mean age was 67.39 ± 8.14 yeas. CPFE patients had higher ratio of rheumatic diseases (21.2 % vs 7.2 %, P = 0.003). CPFE patients exhibited higher values of FEV1 (1.97 vs 1.57, P = 0.002) and FEV1/FVC ratio (69.46 vs 57.64, P < 0.001) compared to COPD patients. CPFE patients had higher eosinophil counts, percentage of eosinophils, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin levels and lower platelet counts. Serum KL-6 levels were higher in CPFE group compared to COPD group (574.95 vs 339.30 U/mL, P < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression showed that KL-6 level was an independent predictive factor for the presence of ILD among COPD patients. The AUC of serum KL-6 levels to differentiate CPFE was 0.711, with 95 % CI being 0.635 to 0.787. The cutoff point of KL-6 level was 550.95 U/mL with 57.7 % sensitivity and 79.7 % specificity for the discrimination of CPFE from COPD. ConclusionCPFE patients show higher KL-6 levels compared to isolated COPD, suggesting the potential of KL-6 as a practical screening tool for interstitial lung disease, specifically CPFE. A KL-6 threshold of 550.95 U/mL in COPD patients may indicate a high need for high-resolution chest computed tomography to detect fibrosis.

The link between smoking, emphysema, and fibrosis: A retrospective cohort study.

The presence of emphysema is common in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), which is designated as combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). This study aimed to examine the association between smoking, emphysema, and fibrosis in ILD patients. A total of 800 patients hospitalized for ILD at the affiliated hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, Qingdao, China, from December 2012 to December 2020 were included in our retrospective cohort study. Participants were divided into CPFE and non-CPFE groups. The patients' clinical presentations and radiographic and laboratory findings were reviewed and compared. The two groups were then divided and compared based on smoking status. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank testing and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare all-cause mortality. Emphysema was present in 188 (23.5%) ILD patients. Smoking was associated with increased odds of CPFE (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=2.13; 95% CI: 1.33-3.41, p=0.002). The CPFE patients had a comparable risk of death to non-CPFE patients (adjusted hazard ratio, AHR=0.89; 95% CI: 0.64-1.24, p=0.493). Smoking was not a risk prognostic factor in the whole group (AHR=1.34; 95% CI: 0.90-1.99, p=0.152) or the CPFE group (AHR=0.90; 95% CI: 0.43-1.86, p=0.771). However, a significant prognostic difference between smokers and non-smokers was found in the non-CPFE group (AHR=1.62; 95% CI: 1.02-2.58, p=0.042). In ILD patients, smoking pack-years were weakly correlated with total centrilobular emphysema (CLE) scores and total fibrosis scores (TFS), but not with total emphysema scores (TES); TFS were weakly correlated with TES. CPFE did not affect the prognosis of ILD. Smoking was a risk but not a prognostic factor for CPFE. However, smoking was associated with worse survival in non-CPFE patients. There was an intricate association among smoking, emphysema, and fibrosis in ILD patients.

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6: promising biomarker to differentiate CPFE from IPF.

Background Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) has been recognised as a phenotype of pulmonary fibrosis. We aimed to compare serum surfactant protein-A (SP-A), surfactant protein-D (SP-D) and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels, functional parameters, in CPFE and IPF (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) patients. Methods Patients diagnosed with 'CPFE' and 'IPF' were consecutively included in 6 months as two groups. The patients with connective tissue diseases are excluded. Results In this study, 47 patients (41 males, 6 females) with CPFE (n = 21) and IPF (n = 26) with a mean age of 70.12 ± 8.75 were evaluated. CPFE patients were older, had more intense smoking history, had lower DLCO/VA, lower FVC, and worse six-minute walking distance than the IPF group (p=0.005, p=0.027, p=0.02, p<0.001, p=0.001, respectively). Serum KL-6 levels were higher in CPFE group compared to IPF group [264.70 U/ml (228.90-786) vs 233.60 (101.8-425.4), p<0.001]. Serum KL-6 levels of 245.4 U/ml and higher have 81% sensitivity and 73% specificity for the discrimination of CPFE from IPF. Conclusions Our study has shown that serum KL-6 level is a promising biomarker to differentiate CPFE from IPF. In CPFE cases respiratory and functional parameters are worse than those of pure fibrosis cases.

Different properties between patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Aim: Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have been discussed intensively in recent years as two different entities. We aimed to compare the clinical, functional and respiratory parameters, clinical course and mortality rates of patients with CPFE with IPF. Materials and Methods: 36 patients with a diagnosis of CPFE and 40 IPF who applied between September 2013 and February 2019 were retrospectively included in the study. Demographic data, comorbidities, pulmonary function parameters, life surveys, systolic pulmonary artery pressures(sPAP) detected. Results: In the CPFE patient group, While the ratio of male patients (p=0.02), smoking (p&lt;0.001), number of inflammation (p=0.001) were found to be significantly higher, SF-36 total score (p&lt;0.001) were significantly lower (p=0.02) than the IPF group. While FVC% (p&lt;0.002), FEV1% (p=0.049) and TLC% (p=0.002) were significantly higher in the CPFE group than in the IPF group, TLCO% (p&lt;0.002) and FEV1/FVC (p&lt;0.001) was lower. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was 40% in CPFE and 37% in IPF and no significant difference was found between them (p=0.806). Those who received long-term oxygen therapy(LTOT) were more common in the CPFE group (p=0.04). In CPFE patients; the percentage of those who received bronchodilator, antifibrotic, systemic corticosteroid was respectively 52.7%, 36.1%, 5.6%. Mortality from any cause was 9(25%) in CPFE and 8(20%) in IPF, and there was no significant difference between the two groups(p=0.601). Conclusion:It was observed that lung volumes were preserved and gas exchange of the lung was significantly decreased in patients with CPFE. Compared to IPF, although the quality of life was lower and inflammation was more common in CPFE, the frequency of PH and mortality were similar in both groups. Male gender and smoking history are important risk factors for this group of patients. There is a need for multicenter studies reporting the clinical features, prognosis, and mortality of CPFE.

Development of a nomogram for predicting the presence of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema

BackgroundIn the clinical management of patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), early recognition and appropriate treatment is essential. This study was designed to develop an accurate prognostic nomogram model to predict the presence of CPFE.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 85 patients with CPFE and 128 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) between January 2015 and January 2020. Clinical characteristics were compared between groups. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for CPFE. Then, and a nomogram to predict the presence of CPFE was constructed for clinical use. Concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration plot was used to evaluate the efficiency of the nomogram.ResultsCompared to the IPF group, the proportion of patients with male, smoking and allergies were significantly higher in the CPFE group. In terms of pulmonary function tests, patients with CPFE had lower FEV1/FVC%, DLCO/VA% pred, and higher RV, RV%pred, VC, VC%pred, TLC%pred, VA, TLC, TLC%pred, FVC, FVC%pred and FEV1 with significant difference than the other group. Positive correlation was found between DLCO and VA%, RV%, TLC% in patients with IPF but not in patients with CPFE. By multivariate analysis, male, smoking, allergies, FEV1/FVC% and DLCO/VA%pred were identified as independent predictors of the presence of CPFE. The nomogram was then developed using these five variables. After 1000 internal validations of bootstrap resampling, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.863 (95% CI 0.795–0.931) and the AUC was 0.839 (95% CI 0.764–0.913). Moreover, the calibration plot showed good concordance of incidence of CPFE between nomogram prediction and actual observation (Hosmer–Lemeshow test: P = 0.307).ConclusionsPatients of CPFE have a characteristic lung function profile including relatively preserved lung volumes and ventilating function, contrasting with a disproportionate reduction of carbon monoxide transfer. By incorporating clinical risk factors, we created a nomogram to predict the presence of CPFE, which may serve as a potential tool to guide personalized treatment.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema After Lung Transplantation

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is recognized as a characteristic syndrome of smoking-related interstitial lung disease that has a worse prognosis than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, outcomes after lung transplantation for CPFE have not been reported. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical features and outcomes of CPFE after lung transplantation. What are the clinical features and outcomes of CPFE after lung transplantation? This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with CPFE and IPF who underwent lung transplantation at our center between January 2011 and December 2016. We defined CPFE as≥10%emphysema in the upper lung fields combined with fibrosis on high-resolution CT scan. We characterized the clinical features of patients with CPFE and compared their outcomes after lung transplantation with those with IPF. Twenty-seven of 172 (16%) patients with IPF met criteria for CPFE. Severe pulmonary hypertension was present in 16 of 27 (59%) patients with CPFE. On logistic regression analysis, CPFE was significantly associated with primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 (OR, 3.14; 95%CI, 1.18-8.37; P= .02). On competing risk regression analysis, CPFE was associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade≥ A2, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95%CI, 1.10-3.25; P= .02; HR, 1.96; 95%CI, 1.02-3.77; P= .04, respectively). Five-year survival was 79.0%for the CPFE group and 75.4%for the IPF group (log-rank P= .684). After transplantation, patients with CPFE were more likely to develop PGD, ACR, and CLAD compared with those with IPF. However, survival was not significantly different between the two groups.

The Gly82Ser mutation in AGER contributes to pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) in Japanese patients

The dominant pathogenesis underlying the combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) remains unresolved. The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) is highly expressed in lung tissues and interacts with distinct multiple ligands, implicating it in certain lung diseases. To elucidate the pathogenesis of CPFE, we genotyped three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs: rs2070600, rs1800625, and rs2853807) of the gene encoding RAGE (AGER) in 111 CPFE patients and 337 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients of Japanese by using StepOne Real-Time PCR System for SNP genotyping assay. Serum levels of soluble RAGE (sRAGE) were measured by ELISA. We found that the allele frequency of rs2070600 was significantly different between the two groups [corrected P (Pc) = 0.015]. In addition, the minor allele was associated with CPFE patients relative to COPD patients in a dominant effect model (Odds Ratio = 1.93; Pc = 0.018). Moreover, the serum sRAGE level was significantly lower in the CPFE group than the COPD group (P = 0.014). The rs2070600 minor allele was significantly associated with reduced sRAGE level in CPFE patients and independently affected sRAGE level reduction in this group (P = 0.020). We concluded that the AGER rs2070600 minor allele (Gly82Ser mutation) is associated with the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis in CPFE in Japanese patients.

Acute exacerbations of COPD versus IPF in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema

RationalePatients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) may develop acute exacerbations of IPF (AE-IPF) or COPD (AE-COPD). The incidence and the characteristics of exacerbations in patients with CPFE (e.g., COPD vs IPF) have not been well described.ObjectivesTo compare the incidence and rate of exacerbations in patients with CPFE vs. IPF and evaluate their effect on clinical outcomes.MethodsComprehensive clinical data from CPFE and IPF patients were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics including lung function data, oxygen requirements, and pulmonary hemodynamics, were collected. Acute exacerbation events in both groups were defined clinically and radiographically. In the CPFE group, two patterns of exacerbations were identified. AE-COPD was defined clinically by symptoms of severe airflow obstruction causing respiratory failure and requiring hospitalization. Radiographic data were also defined based on previously published literature. AE-IPF was defined clinically as an acute hypoxic respiratory failure, requiring hospitalization and treatment with high dose corticosteroids. Radiographically, patients had to have a change in baseline imaging including presence of ground-glass opacities, interlobular septal thickening or new consolidations; that is not fully explained by other etiologies.ResultsEighty-five CPFE patients were retrospectively compared to 112 IPF patients. Of 112 patients with IPF; 45 had AE-IPF preceding lung transplant (40.18%) compared to 12 patients in the CPFE group (14.1%) (p < 0.05). 10 patients in the CPFE group experienced AE-COPD (11.7%). Patients with AE-IPF had higher mortality and more likely required mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) compared to patients with AE-COPD, whether their underlying disease was IPF or CPFE.ConclusionsCPFE patients may experience either AE-IPF or AE-COPD. Patients with CPFE and AE-COPD had better outcomes, requiring less intensive therapy compared to patients with AE-IPF regardless if underlying CPFE or IPF was present. These data suggest that the type of acute exacerbation, AE-COPD vs AE-IPF, has important implications for the treatment and prognosis of patients with CPFE.

Protective role of overexpressed MUC5AC against fibrosis in MHV-68-induced combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema mouse model.

Mucins have long been regarded to play a role as a barrier to prevent mucosal infections; however, some studies report that overexpression of mucins induces obstruction and inflammation of airways. We investigated whether the secretion of overexpressed mucin, mucin5ac (MUC5AC), could improve protection against pathogens. To examine the possible roles of mucin hypersecretion in augmenting host defense against disease-promoting muco-obstructive lung disease, a mouse model that overexpressed MUC5AC was generated. We had previously proved that murine gammaherpesvirus-68 (MHV-68)infection could induce emphysema in mice, which later developed into combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). We further explored whether increased MUC5AC secretion could provide benefits against MHV-68 induced fibrosis. We initially developed a pcDNA3.1-MUC5AC mouse model. Next, the experimental mice were randomly divided into five groups: normal control, pcDNA3.1 control, pcDNA3.1-MUC5AC, CPFE, and pcDNA3.1- MUC5AC + CPFE. Morphometric analysis of each group was performed by hematoxylin and eosin staining and Masson trichrome staining. MUC5AC levels in lung tissues were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and Western blot analysis. The airway inflammation was determined by differential cell counts of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and measurement of cytokines and chemokines in BALF by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. MUC5AC hypersecretion alone was not sufficient to drive goblet cell metaplasia to induce obvious mucus plugging and airway inflammation. However, MUC5AC overexpression served as a protective barrier against MHV-68 virus infection in vivo. Infectivity of MHV-68 was decreased in the pcDNA3.1-MUC5AC + CPFE group compared with that in CPFE group. Meanwhile, a reduction of MHV-68 virus attenuated the expressions of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 5 (CXCL5), interleukin-13 (IL-13), and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), and weakened airway inflammation and fibrosis in the pcDNA3.1-MUC5AC + CPFE group. Overexpression of MUC5AC appears to exhibit a protective role against MHV-68 infection in mice with emphysema that subsequently developed into CPFE and to further decrease airway inflammation and fibrosis induced by MHV-68 by decreasing the expressions of CCL2, CXCL5, IL-13, and TGF-β1.

Prognosis of patients with acute exacerbation of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a retrospective single-centre study

BackgroundPrevious analyses of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) cohorts have provided conflicting data on the survival of patients with CPFE. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical prognosis of acute exacerbations (AE) of CPFE.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had been treated at the Shinshu University Hospital (Matsumoto, Japan) between 2003 and 2017. We identified 21 patients with AE of CPFE and 41 patients with AE of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and estimated their prognoses using the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsTreatment content and respiratory management were not significantly different between the two groups before and after exacerbation. At the time of AE, the median serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 level was significantly lower in the CPFE group (Krebs von den Lungen-6: 966 U/μL; white blood cell count: 8810 /μL) than that in the IPF group (Krebs von den Lungen-6: 2130 U/μL, p < 0.001; white blood cells: 10809/μL, p = 0.0096). The baseline Gender-Age-Physiology scores were not significantly different between the two groups (CPFE, 4.5 points; IPF, 4.7 points; p = 0.58). Kaplan–Meier curves revealed that the survival time after AE for patients with CPFE was longer than that for patients with IPF (p < 0.001, log-rank test).ConclusionsSurvival prognoses after AE were significantly better for patients with CPFE than that for those with IPF. Our findings may improve the medical treatment and respiratory management of patients with AE-CPFE.

The effect of emphysema on survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A retrospective study in Taiwan.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare and chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease. However, the clinical features and outcomes of IPF in Taiwan have not been well studied. In addition, the survival difference between patients with IPF alone and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) remains controversial. Patients diagnosed with IPF between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. IPF was defined according to the 2011 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guideline. The clinical features, comorbidities, and outcomes of CPFE group and IPF-alone group were compared. The extents of emphysema and fibrosis were evaluated. In total, 114 patients with IPF were enrolled, and 86.8% of them were men with a mean age of 77.8 years. The median survival was 3.33 years in all patients with IPF. Moreover, 30 patients (26.3%) met the CPFE criteria. The CPFE group had a higher percentage of smokers (90% vs 50%, p < 0.001), higher forced vital capacity (82% vs 59%, p < 0.001), and lower fibrosis scores (8.5 ± 2.9 vs 10 ± 3.2, p = 0.022) than did the IPF-alone group. The baseline room air saturation and percentage of pulmonary hypertension were similar between the two groups. The survival time was not significantly different between the CPFE and IPF-alone groups (median survival, 3.58 vs 2.39 years, p = 0.163). In the multivariate analysis, higher fibrosis score, room air saturation < 90%, and lung cancer were significant factors associated with mortality. Our study showed that emphysema had no significant effect on the survival of patients with IPF. The outcome of IPF was mainly determined by the baseline disease severity and other comorbidities.

Impact Of Underlying Pulmonary Diseases On Treatment Outcomes In Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy.

PurposeCurrent guidelines recommend definitive radiotherapy for patients with medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of underlying pulmonary diseases on survival in those patients remains unclear.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 234 patients with stage I-II NSCLC treated with definitive radiotherapy alone at Samsung Medical Center between January 2010 and October 2017. We compared survival outcomes according to the presence of underlying pulmonary diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The control group in this study was stage I-II NSCLC patients who were non-COPD, non-CPFE, and non-IPF.ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 17 (range, 1–92) months. The median survival times of the control, COPD, CPFE, and IPF groups were 32, 49, 17, and 12 months, respectively (P<0.001). In a Cox proportional hazards analysis for factors associated with overall survival, patients with COPD showed a similar risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.306; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.723–2.358; P=0.376) compared to that of the control group, while patients with CPFE (adjusted HR, 3.382; 95% CI, 1.472–7.769; P=0.004) and IPF (adjusted HR, 4.061; 95% CI, 1.963–8.403; P<0.001) showed an increased risk of death.ConclusionDefinitive radiotherapy may be a tolerable treatment for early-stage NSCLC with COPD. However, poor survival in early-stage NSCLC patients with IPF or CPFE requires further study to identify and develop patient selection criteria as well as an optimal radiotherapy modality.

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome: clinical, functional, and radiological assessment

BackgroundThe coexistence of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema is increasingly recognized.ObjectiveTo assess the clinical, physiological and radiological characteristics of patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) and compare it with patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) alone.Patients and methodsOne hundred-twenty patients were enrolled and divided into three groups; 40 had COPD based on poorly reversible airflow obstruction in spirometry; 40 had ILD based on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT); and 40 had CPFE based on the presence of emphysematous changes in the upper lung zones and pulmonary fibrosis in lower zones in HRCT. Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, arterial blood gas analysis, spirometry, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), polythesmography, HRCT chest, and echocardiography were done.ResultsMore than 57% of patients with CPFE were men and the majority of them were smokers. There was no significant difference in dyspnea grade between CPFE group and other groups (P>0.05). The rate of exacerbation per year was significantly higher in the CPFE group (4.2±1.02) compared with either COPD group (3.33±1.56) or ILD group (3.15 ±1.05). CPFE patients had both emphysematous and fibrotic changes on radiological examination. Lung volumes were preserved but DLCO% was significantly lower and the mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure was significantly higher in the CPFE group compared with COPD and ILD.ConclusionCPFE is a distinct syndrome that has characteristic radiological findings and lung function profile with a significant reduction of DLCO and a significant increase in pulmonary artery systolic pressure.

The prognostic impact of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

We evaluated the long-term outcomes of clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) who underwent lobectomy. We reviewed the chest computed tomography (CT) findings and divided the patients into normal, fibrosis, emphysema and CPFE groups. We evaluated the relationships among the CT findings, the clinicopathological findings and postoperative survival. The patients were classified into the following groups based on the preoperative chest CT findings: normal lung, n=187; emphysema, n=62; fibrosis, n=8; and CPFE, n=17. The patients with CPFE were significantly older, more likely to be men and smokers, had a higher KL-6 level and lower FEV 1.0% value and had a higher rate of squamous cell carcinoma. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates were as follows: normal group, 82.5 and 76.8%; emphysema group, 80.0 and 74.9%; fibrosis group, 46.9 and 50%; and CPFE group, 36.9 and 27.9%, respectively (p<0.01). A univariate and multivariate analysis determined that the pathological stage and CT findings were associated with OS. CPFE is a significantly unfavorable prognostic factor after lobectomy, even in early-stage NSCLC patients with a preserved lung function.

Genetic polymorphism in matrix metalloproteinase-9 and transforming growth factor-β1 and susceptibility to combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in a Chinese population

In this study, we aimed to explore the association of genetic polymorphism in matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and the susceptibility to combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). We examined the polymorphisms of the MMP-9 C-1562T and TGF-β1 T869C in 38 CPFE patients, 50 pulmonary emphysema patients, and 34 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients. The frequencies of polymorphic genotypes in MMP-9 were 78.95% CC and 21.05% CT in CPFE group, 76.0% CC and 24.0% CT in emphysema group, and 100.0% CC in IPF group. There were highly statistically significant increased frequencies of the CT genotype and T allele in CPFE and emphysema groups compared with IPF group (p < 0.05). The frequencies of polymorphic genotypes in TGF-β1 were 2.63% CC, 28.95% CT, 68.42% TT in CPFE group, 4.00% CC, 16.00% CT, 80.00% TT in emphysema group, and 5.88% CC, 41.18% CT, 52.94% TT in IPF group. Significant increases in the TT genotype and T allele frequencies were observed in emphysema group compared with IPF group (p < 0.05). Our study has showed that T allele in MMP-9 (C-1562T) and T allele in TGF-β1 (T869C) are risk factors of pulmonary emphysema. The T allele in MMP-9 (C-1562T) possibly predisposes patients with pulmonary fibrosis to develop emphysema.

Lung cancer in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema revisited with the 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors.

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a newly defined entity that comprises upper lobe emphysema and lower lobe fibrosis. Patients with CPFE are at high risk for lung cancer and have poor prognoses. To investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of lung cancer with CPFE, lung cancers with CPFE and non-CPFE interstitial lung disease (ILD) were reevaluated by 2015 WHO classification and compared. A total of 60 patients with histologically proven lung cancer were selected from the database of two institutional medical centers. The subjects included 35 patients with combined lung cancer and CPFE, and 25 patients with lung cancer and non-CPFE ILD. The clinical and pathological characteristics were evaluated and compared between the two groups. CPFE group had more current smokers but relatively normal pulmonary function compared with non-CPFE group. The majority of the cancers in CPFE were located in the lower lobes (24 of 35 cases), where the pulmonary fibrosis visualized as reticular opacities was predominant. Keranitizing subtype of squamous cell carcinoma was prevalent in lung cancers with CPFE. Poor prognoses were found both for CPFE and non-CPFE group because of advanced stage. Lung cancers with CPFE show some unique clinical characteristics, and the distinct histological subtype may have therapeutic implication.

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis.

BackgroundCombined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is increasingly acknowledged as a separate syndrome with distinct clinical, physiological and radiological characteristics. We sought to identify physiologic and radiographic indices that predict mortality in CPFE.MethodsData on clinical characteristics, pulmonary function, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and treatment were compared between patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) plus emphysema (CPFE group) and those with IPF alone (IPF group). Composite physiologic index (CPI) and HRCT scores at diagnosis and during follow-up were assessed.ResultsCPFE group (N = 87) was characterized by the predominance of males and smokers, who were less likely to have viral infection prior to the diagnosis, and display basal crackles, finger clubbing and wheeze, as compared to that in the IPF group (N = 105). HRCT and CPI scores increased over time in both groups. Moreover, CPFE group had a poorer prognosis, lower 5-year survival rate (43.42 % vs. 65.56 %; P < 0.05), and higher mortality (39.47 % vs. 23.33 %; P < 0.05) as compared to that in the IPF group. All CPFE patients received oxygen therapy, antibiotics and oral N-acetylcysteine; > 50 % received bronchodilators, 40 % received corticosteroids and 14 % needed noninvasive mechanical ventilation. On survival analyses, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and ≥ 5-point increase in CPI score per year were predictors of mortality in the CPFE group (hazard ratio [HR]: 10.29, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 2.69–39.42 and HR: 21.60, 95 % CI: 7.28–64.16, respectively).ConclusionPatients with CPFE were predominantly male and smokers and exhibited distinct clinical, physiological and radiographic characteristics. They had a poorer prognosis than IPF. PAH and ≥ 5-point increase in CPI score per year were predictors of mortality in these patients. Future studies are needed to identify the optimal treatment approach to CPFE.

Clinical features and outcomes of patients with lung cancer as well as combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema.

The syndrome of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) has been characterized by severely impaired gas exchange and poor survival. However, the clinical features of patients with lung cancer plus CPFE have remained elusive. The present study performed a retrospective analysis to examine the clinical characteristics and outcome of surgically resected patients with lung cancer plus CPFE. Among 831 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent surgical resection, 23 patients (2.8%) were diagnosed with CPFE and 9 patients (1.1%) with solely idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Thirty-five patients were stratified as the solely emphysema group with adjustment of the pathological stage. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients in the CPFE group and their outcomes were evaluated and compared with those with the solely IPF or solely emphysema groups. Within the CPFE group, no significant differences in survival between patients with post-operative acute exacerbation (AE; n=3) and those without AE (n=20) were noted; however, in the solely IPF group, patients with post-operative AE (n=4) had a significantly shorter survival than those without AE (n=5; P=0.022). The 5-year survival rate of patients in the CPFE, solely IPF and solely emphysema groups was 22, 22 and 58%, respectively. Furthermore, the CPFE and solely IPF groups showed a significantly shorter survival than the solely emphysema group (P=0.001 and 0.011, respectively). In conclusion, surgically resected lung cancer patients with CPFE had poor survival, which was, in contrast to that of lung cancer patients with solely IPF, not affected by AE.

Impact of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema on surgical complications and long-term survival in patients undergoing surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer.

PurposeThe outcome of radical surgery for lung cancer was investigated in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE).MethodsA retrospective chart review involved 250 patients with lung cancer who underwent pulmonary resection at Tokyo Women’s Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center between 2008 and 2012. Based on the status of nontumor-bearing lung evaluated by preoperative computed tomography (CT), the patients were divided into normal, emphysema, interstitial pneumonia (IP), and CPFE groups, and their clinical characteristics and surgical outcome were analyzed.ResultsThe normal, emphysema, IP, and CPFE groups comprised 124 (49.6%), 108 (43.2%), seven (2.8%), and eleven (4.4%) patients, respectively. The 5-year survival rate of the CPFE group (18.7%) was significantly lower than that of the normal (77.5%) and emphysema groups (67.1%) (P<0.0001 and P=0.0027, respectively) but equivalent to that of the IP group (44.4%) (P=0.2928). In a subset analysis of cancer stage, the 5-year overall survival rate of the CPFE group in stage I (n=8, 21.4%) was also lower than that of the normal group and emphysema group in stage I (n=91, 84.9% and n=70, 81.1%; P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). During entire observation period, the CPFE group was more likely to die of respiratory failure (27.2%) compared with the normal and emphysema groups (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors using Cox proportional hazard model identified CPFE as an independent risk factor (P=0.009).ConclusionCPFE patients have a poorer prognosis than those with emphysema alone or with normal lung on CT finding. The intensive evaluation of preoperative CT images is important, and radical surgery for lung cancer should be decided carefully when patients concomitantly harbor CPFE, because of unfavorable prognosis.

Impact of Thin-Section Computed Tomography-Determined Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema on Outcomes Among Patients With Resected Lung Cancer

There is only limited information on the clinical impact of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) on postoperative and survival outcomes among patients with resected lung cancer. In a retrospective analysis, data were reviewed from 685 patients with resected lung cancer between 2006 and 2011. The clinical impact of thin-section computed tomography (TSCT)-determined emphysema, fibrosis, and CPFE on postoperative and survival outcomes was evaluated. The emphysema group comprised 32.4% of the study population, the fibrosis group 2.8%, and the CPFE group 8.3%. The CPFE group had a more advanced pathologic stage and higher prevalence of squamous cell carcinoma as compared with the normal group without emphysema or fibrosis findings on TSCT. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the CPFE group. Overall, the 30-day mortality in the CPFE group was 5.3%. Cancer recurrence at pathologic stage I and death due to either cancer or other causes were significantly higher in the CPFE group. Survival curves indicated that a finding of CPFE was associated with worse overall survival for patients with any stage disease. Multivariate analysis suggested that pathologic stage and CPFE were independent factors associated with worse overall survival. The adjusted hazard ratio of overall survival for the CPFE group versus the normal group was 2.990 (95% confidence interval: 1.801 to 4.962). Among patients with resected lung cancer, the presence of TSCT-determined CPFE might predict worse postoperative and survival outcomes.