The Other Zulus: The Spread of Zulu Ethnicity in Colonial South Africa, by Michael R. Mahoney. Politics, History and Culture series. Durham, North Carolina, Duke University Press, 2012. xv, 293 pp. $89.95 US (cloth), $24.95 US (paper). In this work Michael Mahoney asks a deceptively simple question. How did so many Africans come to identify as Zulu, the single largest ethnic group in South Africa today, when so few did in the early colonial era? His answer, in this elegantly written and at times combative work, is that Africans in the British colony of Natal chose a common Zulu identity in the colonial era that they had not previously shared. Zulu ethnicity became both a means of resistance, but also a way to heal internal divisions that made them vulnerable to colonial rule. He bookends this study with two moments of violence that are well-mined by historians. In 1879 the British Empire went to war against the Zulu nation. With their substantial military advantage the English, based out of Natal, eventually emerged victorious, but not before the Zulu army badly bloodied them at Isandlwana and cemented a reputation as warriors that persists to this day. Mahoney finds it remarkable, and he is right, that many Natal Africans joined the British in this effort, volunteering their services against the Zulu state. How quickly, Mahoney notes, this turned. In 1906, twenty-seven years later, Africans in Natal, pushed to extremes by an increasingly oppressive settler government, claimed a united Zuluness and broke into a rebellion that was swiftly and brutally repressed. Colonial troops killed thousands of Africans, imprisoned and flogged thousands more, and the entire affair led to a series of laws that provided a foundation for apartheid. Why, Mahoney asks, were Africans initially willing to fight for the British, but within a generation had switched their allegiance to the very Zulu identity they had gone to war against. To answer this, Mahoney argues that the Zulu kingdom failed to integrate the many peoples it conquered during its birth in the early 1800s under Shaka, their first monarch. This was in part because the Zulu ruling class arrogated to itself many of the traditional powers long held by local headmen and chiefs. Worse, the Zulu state exacerbated natural divisions by employing excessive violence in the face of resistance to their actions. When the British established a colony in 1834 across the Tugela River in the neighbouring land of Natal, many African peoples took advantage of the opportunity and fled Zulu control. One of these was the Qwabe chiefdom, which settled just across the Tugela within sight and under constant threat from the Zulu state, and it is to their transformation that Mahoney pays particular attention. The book is at its strongest when Mahoney focuses on the Qwabe, something he does to varying degrees in every chapter. Tradition has it that the Qwabe and Zulu chiefdoms were born when two brothers feuded over their inheritance. Both emerged as independent chiefdoms reliant upon a long tradition of patriarchal lineages loosely bound together under the leadership of individual chiefs. …
Read full abstract