PURPOSE: To evaluate the importance of lower body and upper body anaerobic power in relation to performance in track and field events where the importance and development of anaerobic power varies substantially from event to event. METHODS: Thirty-two collegiate track and field athletes performed a standard Wingate Anaerobic Test to evaluate lower body anaerobic power (AnP-L) followed by a modified Wingate Anaerobic Test to evaluate upper body anaerobic power (AnP-U). Each athlete's personal records were converted to standardized values using the IAAF Scoring Tables of Athletics and the standardize values were correlated with AnP-L and AnP-U. RESULTS: The highest levels of peak AnP-L were achieved in short sprints, 200 and sprint hurdles (9.78 W/kg, 9.76 W/kg, 9.62 W/kg). The lowest levels of peak AnP-L were achieved in 5,000/10,000, 1,500/Mile and 800 (8.17 W/kg, 8.34 W/kg, 8.92 W/kg). The highest levels of average AnP-L were achieved in horizontal jumps, 200 and short sprints (7.75 W/kg, 7.68 W/kg, 7.67 W/kg). The lowest levels of average AnP-L were achieved in 5,000/10,000, vertical jumps, 800 and 1,500/Mile (6.74 W/kg, 7.14 W/kg, 7.18 W/kg, 7.18 W/kg). The highest levels of peak AnP-U were achieved in 400, sprint hurdles and 200 (3.34 W/kg, 3.31 W/kg, 3.30 W/kg). The lowest levels of peak AnP-U were achieved in 5,000/10,000, 800 and 1,500/Mile (2.35 W/kg, 2.77 W/kg, 2.79 W/kg). The highest levels of average AnP-U were achieved in sprint hurdles, 200 and horizontal jumps (2.65 W/kg, 2.59 W/kg, 2.53 W/kg). The lowest levels of average AnP-U were achieved in 5,000/10,000, 1,500/Mile and 800 (1.98 W/kg, 2.23 W/kg, 2.29 W/kg). Peak AnP-L correlated most with performance for 1,500, 800, sprint hurdles, 200 and 400 (0.93, 0.90, 0.68, 0.59, 0.51). Average AnP-L correlated most with performance for 1,500/Mile, 800, 400, 200 and short sprints (0.97, 0.91, 0.80, 0.64, 0.39). Peak AnP-U correlated most with performance in vertical jumps and 1,500/Mile (0.75, 0.34). Average AnP-U correlated most with performance in 800, 1,500/Mile, horizontal jumps and 400 (0.96, 0.92, 0.57, 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that anaerobic power may be a secondary consequence of training in a wide range of track and field events, but that excessive emphasis should not be placed on the development of anaerobic power for track and field events.
Read full abstract