The News & Comment article âU.S. neutron scientists settle for lessâ by Andrew Lawler ([9 Aug., p. 728][1]) provides a sobering assessment of the current status of neutron facilities in the United States and prospects for new ones. I take issue, however, with the description of the neutron research community as âsmall and fractious.â The âfractiousâ aspects of our community (as Lawler amply demonstrates) are mainly within the U.S. Department of Energy and its competing national laboratories, not among neutron researchers, the large majority of whom come from universities and industries. Nor is our community âsmall.â Well over 1000 physicists, chemists, materials scientists, and engineers participate in research in the United States every year using neutron beams, and this number has doubled in the last decade. As an example, researchers using the reactor at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which has recently developed the only internationally competitive cold neutron research facility (CNRF) in the United States, have tripled since the opening of the CNRF in 1990. Moreover, these numbers do not reflect broad and critical U.S. needs for isotopes and irradiation facilities applied to medicine and technology, which also require modern neutron sources. Unfortunately, our community has not benefited from development of a totally new neutron source in this country for more than 25 years, and we are continuing to fall behind our international competitors, a point clearly documented by Lawler. We must find a way to meet the increasing neutron research needs of modern U.S. science and technology. Even in the face of tight budgets, we in our field must unite to make a coherent case and set priorities for critically needed investments for a new neutron source and for upgrades to existing neutron facilities. This effort must be less concerned with the needs of any particular national laboratory than with providing the best capabilities for the nation. Failure to succeed in this mission could lead to a loss of any chance for the United States to be competitive in vital neutron measurements, nuclear medicine, and related technologies, as we move into the next century. [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.273.5276.728
Read full abstract