Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine self-directed learning among medical students by type and to investigate whether there are differences in academic achievement based on these types. Methods In order to achieve the research purpose, data were collected from 65 fourth-year medical students enrolled in a professionalism-related course at a medical school in Seoul. Scores on self-directed learning competencies and perceived academic achievement were analyzed using descriptive statistics, frequency analysis, and chi-square tests. Results The findings of the study are as follows: first, among the sub-factors of self-directed learning, cognitive organization was the highest, followed by motivational beliefs. Second, when classifying self-directed learning types based on individual scores, the cognitive type was the highest, followed by the metacognitive type, and then the motivational type. Third, examining differences in academic achievement according to types of self-directed learning among medical students revealed that students with a cognitive self-directed learning type tended to have moderate academic achievement, those with a metacognitive type had higher academic achievement, and those with a motivational type had the lowest academic achievement. Conclusions This study confirmed that metacognition is a significant factor in medical students' learning. The findings of this study are expected to serve as foundational data for improving learning support for medical students in the future.
Read full abstract