Abstract BACKGROUND CNS Germinoma cases are associated with good medical prognosis, low risk for neurological deficits and high cognitive functioning. Deeper psychological and neuropsychological examination and longitudinal observation shows also neurocognitive problems and emotional disturbances. The purpose of the study was to assess patients with CNS Germinoma (during and after anticancer treatment), expressed specific psychological and physical symptoms and to find the reason for this. METHODS Since 1998 all patients treated at our center are under psychological control and care. From these group 78 patients with CNS Germinoma with additional significant symptoms, seriously affected their quality of life and everyday activity, were selected for psychological and neuropsychological assessment. Age at psychological intervention ranged from 6 5/12 to 34 8/12 yrs. The patients have no pre-diagnosis history of neurological, developmental or psychiatric disorder. They were examined using a battery of standardized psychological and neuropsychological methods. RESULTS In our sample FIQ (full-scale intelligence quotient) score ranged from 59 to 139. The most patients presented average level of intelligence. However, cognitive functioning was often reduced due to emotional disturbances and psychosomatic complains. 2 patients showed memory disorders, one of them TGA (transient global amnesia) at the time of diagnosis. All patients struggled with emotional disturbances at different grades, especially internalizing type of problems (immaturity, depression, anxiety, instability, inhibition, negative attitude) or were considered to be at risk for psychological adjustment difficulties and tendency to somatization. Analyzed group of patients showed also social competences deficits. They may exhibit deficit in age-appropriate social competence and peers relations. CONCLUSIONS Although CNS Germinoma patients shows similar behavioral and emotional phenotype, there are significant differences between them in terms of cognitive functions. The range of results is wide, from high levels to neurocognitive disorders. Therefore, risk factors, diagnostic criteria and effective neuropsychological intervention, will also be presented and discussed.