ClpAP Protease Research Articles

Peptidase Activity of the Escherichia coli Hsp31 Chaperone

Hsp31, the Escherichia coli hcha gene product, is a molecular chaperone whose activity is inhibited by ATP at high temperature. Its crystal structure reveals a putative Cys(184), His(185), and Asp(213) catalytic triad similar to that of the Pyrococcus horikoshii protease PH1704, suggesting that it should display a proteolytic activity. A preliminary report has shown that Hsp31 has an exceedingly weak proteolytic activity toward bovine serum albumin and a peptidase activity toward two peptide substrates with small amino acids at their N terminus (alanine or glycine), but the physiological significance of this observation remains unclear. In this study, we report that Hsp31 does not diplay any significant proteolytic activity but has peptidolytic activity. The aminopeptidase cleavage preference of Hsp31 is Ala > Lys > Arg > His, suggesting that Hsp31 is an aminopeptidase of broad specificity. Its aminopeptidase activity is inhibited by the thiol reagent iodoacetamide and is completely abolished in a C185A mutant, which is consistent with Hsp31 being a cysteine peptidase. The aminopeptidase activity of Hsp31 is also inhibited by EDTA and 1,10-phenanthroline, in concordance with the importance of the putative His(85), His(122), and Glu(90) metal-binding site revealed by crystallographic studies. An Hsp31-deficient mutant accumulates more 8-12-mer peptides than its parental strain, and purified Hsp31 can transform these peptides into smaller peptides, suggesting that Hsp31 has an important peptidase function both in vivo and in vitro. Proteins interacting with Hsp31 have been identified by reverse purification of a crude E. coli extract on an Hsp31-affinity column, followed by SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. The ClpA component of the ClpAP protease, the chaperone GroEL, elongation factor EF-Tu, and tryptophanase were all found to interact with Hsp31, thus substantiating the role of Hsp31 as both chaperone and peptidase.

Binding and Degradation of Heterodimeric Substrates by ClpAP and ClpXP

ClpA and ClpX function both as molecular chaperones and as the regulatory components of ClpAP and ClpXP proteases, respectively. ClpA and ClpX bind substrate proteins through specific recognition signals, catalyze ATP-dependent protein unfolding of the substrate, and when in complexes with ClpP translocate the unfolded polypeptide into the cavity of the ClpP peptidase for degradation. To examine the mechanism of interaction of ClpAP with dimeric substrates, single round binding and degradation experiments were performed, revealing that ClpAP degraded both subunits of a RepA homodimer in one cycle of binding. Furthermore, ClpAP was able to degrade both protomers of a RepA heterodimer in which only one subunit contained the ClpA recognition signal. In contrast, ClpXP degraded both subunits of a dimeric substrate only when both protomers contained a recognition signal. These data suggest that ClpAP and ClpXP may recognize and bind substrates in significantly different ways.

Identification of the protease and the turnover signal responsible for cell cycle-dependent degradation of the Caulobacter FliF motor protein.

Flagellar ejection is tightly coupled to the cell cycle in Caulobacter crescentus. The MS ring protein FliF, which anchors the flagellar structure in the inner membrane, is degraded coincident with flagellar release. Previous work showed that removal of 26 amino acids from the C terminus of FliF prevents degradation of the protein and interferes with flagellar assembly. To understand FliF degradation in more detail, we identified the protease responsible for FliF degradation and performed a high-resolution mutational analysis of the C-terminal degradation signal of FliF. Cell cycle-dependent turnover of FliF requires an intact clpA gene, suggesting that the ClpAP protease is required for removal of the MS ring protein. Deletion analysis of the entire C-terminal cytoplasmic portion of FliF C confirmed that the degradation signal was contained in the last 26 amino acids that were identified previously. However, only deletions longer than 20 amino acids led to a stable FliF protein, while shorter deletions dispersed over the entire 26 amino acids critical for turnover had little effect on stability. This indicated that the nature of the degradation signal is not based on a distinct primary amino acid sequence. The addition of charged amino acids to the C-terminal end abolished cell cycle-dependent FliF degradation, implying that a hydrophobic tail feature is important for the degradation of FliF. Consistent with this, ClpA-dependent degradation was restored when a short stretch of hydrophobic amino acids was added to the C terminus of stable FliF mutant forms.

Crystallographic investigation of peptide binding sites in the N-domain of the ClpA chaperone

Escherichia coli ClpA, an Hsp100/Clp chaperone and an integral component of the ATP-dependent ClpAP protease, participates in the dissolution and degradation of regulatory proteins and protein aggregates. ClpA consists of three functional domains: an N-terminal domain and two ATPase domains, D1 and D2. The N-domain is attached to D1 by a mobile linker and is made up of two tightly bound, identically folded α-helical bundles related by a pseudo 2-fold symmetry. Between the halves of the pseudo-dimer is a large flexible acidic loop that becomes better ordered upon binding of the small adaptor protein, ClpS. We have identified a number of structural features in the N-domain, including a Zn ++ binding motif, several interfaces for binding to ClpS, and a prominent hydrophobic surface area that binds peptides in different configurations. These structural motifs may contribute to binding of protein or peptide substrates with weak affinity and broad specificity. Kinetic studies comparing wild-type ClpA to a mutant ClpA with its N-domain deleted show that the N-domains contribute to the binding of a non-specific protein substrate but not of a folded substrate with the specific SsrA recognition tag. A functional model is proposed in which the N-domains in ClpA function as tentacles to weakly hold on to proteins thereby enhancing local substrate concentration.

ClpA and ClpX ATPases bind simultaneously to opposite ends of ClpP peptidase to form active hybrid complexes

The Escherichia coli ATP-dependent ClpAP and ClpXP proteases are composed of a single proteolytic component, ClpP, complexed with either of the two related chaperones, ClpA or ClpX. ClpXP and ClpAP complexes interact with different specific substrates and catalyze ATP-dependent protein unfolding and degradation. In vitro in the presence of ATP or ATPγS, ClpA and ClpX form homomeric rings of six subunits, which bind to one or both ends of the double heptameric rings of ClpP. We have observed that, when equimolar amounts of ClpA and ClpX hexamers are added to ClpP in vitro in the presence of ATP or ATPγS, hybrid complexes in which ClpX and ClpA are bound to opposite ends of the same ClpP are readily formed. The distribution of homomeric and heteromeric complexes was consistent with random binding of ClpA and ClpX to the ends of ClpP. Direct demonstration of the functionality of the heteromeric complexes was obtained by electron microscopy, which allowed us to visualize substrate translocation into proteolytically inactive ClpP chambers. Starting with hybrid complexes to which protein substrates specific to ClpX or ClpA were bound, translocation of both types of substrates was shown to occur without significant redistribution of ClpA or ClpX. The stoichiometric ratios of the ClpA, ClpX, and ClpP oligomeric complexes in vivo are consistent with the predominance of heteromeric complexes in growing cells. Thus, ClpXAP is a bifunctional protease whose two ends can independently target different classes of substrates.

The N-terminal substrate-binding domain of ClpA unfoldase is highly mobile and extends axially from the distal surface of ClpAP protease

ClpAP is a barrel-like complex consisting of hexameric rings of the ClpA ATPase stacked on the double heptameric ring of ClpP peptidase. ClpA has two AAA+ domains (Dl and D2) and a 153-residue N-domain. Substrate proteins bind to the distal surface of ClpA and are unfolded and translocated axially into ClpP. To gain insight into the functional architecture of ClpA in the ATPγS state, we have determined its structure at 12 Å resolution by cryo-electron microscopy. The resulting model has two tiers, corresponding to rings of Dl and D2 domains: oddly, there is no sign of the N-domains in the density map. However, they were detected as faint diffuse density distal to the Dl tier in a difference image between wild-type ClpAP and a mutant lacking the N-domain. This region is also accentuated in a variance map of ClpAP and in a difference imaging experiment with ClpAP complexed with ClpS, a 12 kDa protein that binds to the N-domain. These observations demonstrate that the N-domains are highly mobile. From molecular modeling, we identify their median position and estimate that they undergo fluctuations of at least 30 Å. We discuss the implications of these observations for the role of N-domains in substrate binding: either they effect an initial transient binding, relaying substrate to a second site on the Dl tier where unfolding ensues, or they may serve as an entropic brush to clear the latter site of non-specifically bound ligands or substrates bound in non-productive complexes.

Chaperone networks in bacteria: analysis of protein homeostasis in minimal cells

The prevention of aberrant behavior of proteins is fundamental to cellular life. Protein homeostatic processes are present in cells to stabilize protein conformations, refold misfolded proteins, and degrade proteins that might be detrimental to the cell. Molecular chaperones and proteases perform a major role in these processes. In bacteria, the main cytoplasmic components involved in protein homeostasis include the chaperones trigger factor, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE, GroEL/GroES, HtpG, as well as ClpB and the proteases ClpXP, ClpAP, HslUV, Lon, and FtsH. Based on recent genome sequencing efforts, it was surprising to find that the Mycoplasma, a genus proposed to include a minimal form of cellular life, do not contain certain major members of the protein homeostatic network, including GroEL/GroES. We propose that, in mycoplasmas, there has been a fundamental shift towards favoring processes that promote protein degradation rather than protein folding. The arguments are based on two different premises: (1) the regulation of stress response in Mycoplasma and (2) the unique characteristics of the Mycoplasma proteome.

Crystal structure of the AAA + α domain of E. coli Lon protease at 1.9 Å resolution

The crystal structure of the small, mostly helical α domain of the AAA + module of the Escherichia coli ATP-dependent protease Lon has been solved by single isomorphous replacement combined with anomalous scattering and refined at 1.9 Å resolution to a crystallographic R factor of 17.9%. This domain, comprising residues 491–584, was obtained by chymotrypsin digestion of the recombinant full-length protease. The α domain of Lon contains four α helices and two parallel strands and resembles similar domains found in a variety of ATPases and helicases, including the oligomeric proteases HslVU and ClpAP. The highly conserved “sensor-2” Arg residue is located at the beginning of the third helix. Detailed comparison with the structures of 11 similar domains established the putative location of the nucleotide-binding site in this first fragment of Lon for which a crystal structure has become available.

Proteolysis in prokaryotes: protein quality control and regulatory principles.

Proteolysis in prokaryotes: protein quality control and regulatory principles.

Dynamic control of Dps protein levels by ClpXP and ClpAP proteases in Escherichia coli.

The Escherichia coli starvation-induced DNA protection protein Dps was observed to be degraded rapidly during exponential growth. This turnover is dependent on the clpP and clpX genes. The clpA gene is not required for Dps proteolysis, suggesting that Dps is a substrate for ClpXP protease but not for ClpAP protease. Dps proteolysis was found to be highly regulated. Upon carbon starvation, Dps is stabilized, which together with increased Dps synthesis allows strong accumulation of Dps in the stationary phase. The addition of glucose to starving cells results in rapid resumption of Dps proteolysis by ClpXP. Oxidative stress also leads to efficient stabilization of Dps. After hyperosmotic shift, however, proteolysis remains unaffected. Thus, regulated proteolysis of Dps strongly contributes to controlling Dps levels under very specific stress conditions. In contrast to the regulated degradation of RpoS by ClpXP, Dps proteolysis is independent of the recognition factor RssB. In addition, during starvation, clpP and, to a somewhat lesser extent, clpA are involved in maintaining ongoing Dps synthesis (acting at the level of Dps translation), which is required for strong Dps accumulation in long-term stationary phase cells. In summary, both ClpXP and ClpAP exert significant control of Dps levels by affecting log phase stability and stationary phase synthesis of Dps respectively.

Crystal Structure of ClpA, an Hsp100 Chaperone and Regulator of ClpAP Protease

Escherichia coli ClpA, an Hsp100/Clp chaperone and an integral component of the ATP-dependent ClpAP protease, participates in regulatory protein degradation and the dissolution and degradation of protein aggregates. The crystal structure of the ClpA subunit reveals an N-terminal domain with pseudo-twofold symmetry and two AAA(+) modules (D1 and D2) each consisting of a large and a small sub-domain with ADP bound in the sub-domain junction. The N-terminal domain interacts with the D1 domain in a manner similar to adaptor-binding domains of other AAA(+) proteins. D1 and D2 are connected head-to-tail consistent with a cooperative and vectorial translocation of protein substrates. In a planar hexamer model of ClpA, built by assembling ClpA D1 and D2 into homohexameric rings of known structures of AAA(+) modules, the differences in D1-D1 and D2-D2 interfaces correlate with their respective contributions to hexamer stability and ATPase activity.

Crystal structure of ClpA, an hsp100 chaperone and regulator of ClpAP protease: structural basis of differences in function of the two AAA+ ATPase domains

Crystal structure of ClpA, an hsp100 chaperone and regulator of ClpAP protease: structural basis of differences in function of the two AAA+ ATPase domains

PII: S0969-2126(01)00614-1

PII: S0969-2126(01)00614-1

Translocation pathway of protein substrates in ClpAP protease.

Intracellular protein degradation, which must be tightly controlled to protect normal proteins, is carried out by ATP-dependent proteases. These multicomponent enzymes have chaperone-like ATPases that recognize and unfold protein substrates and deliver them to the proteinase components for digestion. In ClpAP, hexameric rings of the ClpA ATPase stack axially on either face of the ClpP proteinase, which consists of two apposed heptameric rings. We have used cryoelectron microscopy to characterize interactions of ClpAP with the model substrate, bacteriophage P1 protein, RepA. In complexes stabilized by ATPgammaS, which bind but do not process substrate, RepA dimers are seen at near-axial sites on the distal surface of ClpA. On ATP addition, RepA is translocated through approximately 150 A into the digestion chamber inside ClpP. Little change is observed in ClpAP, implying that translocation proceeds without major reorganization of the ClpA hexamer. When translocation is observed in complexes containing a ClpP mutant whose digestion chamber is already occupied by unprocessed propeptides, a small increase in density is observed within ClpP, and RepA-associated density is also seen at other axial sites. These sites appear to represent intermediate points on the translocation pathway, at which segments of unfolded RepA subunits transiently accumulate en route to the digestion chamber.

ATP-Dependent Proteases Degrade Their Substrates by Processively Unraveling Them from the Degradation Signal

Protein unfolding is a key step in several cellular processes, including protein translocation across some membranes and protein degradation by ATP-dependent proteases. ClpAP protease and the proteasome can actively unfold proteins in a process that hydrolyzes ATP. Here we show that these proteases seem to catalyze unfolding by processively unraveling their substrates from the attachment point of the degradation signal. As a consequence, the ability of a protein to be degraded depends on its structure as well as its stability. In multidomain proteins, independently stable domains are unfolded sequentially. We show that these results can explain the limited degradation by the proteasome that occurs in the processing of the precursor of the transcription factor NF-κB.

Substrate Recognition by the ClpA Chaperone Component of ClpAP Protease

ClpA, a member of the Clp/Hsp100 ATPase family, is a molecular chaperone and regulatory component of ClpAP protease. We explored the mechanism of protein recognition by ClpA using a high affinity substrate, RepA, which is activated for DNA binding by ClpA and degraded by ClpAP. By characterizing RepA derivatives with N- or C-terminal deletions, we found that the N-terminal portion of RepA is required for recognition. More precisely, RepA derivatives lacking the N-terminal 5 or 10 amino acids are degraded by ClpAP at a rate similar to full-length RepA, whereas RepA derivatives lacking 15 or 20 amino acids are degraded much more slowly. Thus, ClpA recognizes an N-terminal signal in RepA beginning in the vicinity of amino acids 10-15. Moreover, peptides corresponding to RepA amino acids 4-13 and 1-15 inhibit interactions between ClpA and RepA. We constructed fusions of RepA and green fluorescent protein, a protein not recognized by ClpA, and found that the N-terminal 15 amino acids of RepA are sufficient to target the fusion protein for degradation by ClpAP. However, fusion proteins containing 46 or 70 N-terminal amino acids of RepA are degraded more efficiently in vitro and are noticeably stabilized in vivo in clpADelta and clpPDelta strains compared with wild type.

ATP-Dependent Conformational Changes and Translocation of Substrates in Clpap Protease as Revealed by Cryo-Electron Microscopy

Abstract ClpAP, an ATP-dependent protease of E. coli, recognizes and unfolds protein substrates via ClpA, its chaperonelike ATPase component, and digests them in ClpP, its protease component. ClpA forms hexameric rings with a two-layered structure, and stacks axially on either face of the double heptameric rings of ClpP. Protein substrates can bind to ClpAP in the presence of ATPγS, which is not hydrolyzed by ClpA, but are not degraded unless ATP is added. This property makes it possible to synchronize degradation in vitro by forming enzymesubstrate complexes in the presence of ATPγS and then adding ATP to trigger subsequent steps. We have used image averaging of electron micrographs of frozen hydrated and negatively stained specimens to characterize interactions of ClpA and ClpAP complexes with the model substrate, bacteriophage P1 protein, RepA.

Protein binding and unfolding by the chaperone ClpA and degradation by the protease ClpAP.

ClpA, a bacterial member of the Clp/Hsp100 chaperone family, is an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone and the regulatory component of the ATP-dependent ClpAP protease. To study the mechanism of binding and unfolding of proteins by ClpA and translocation to ClpP, we used as a model substrate a fusion protein that joined the ClpA recognition signal from RepA to green fluorescent protein (GFP). ClpAP degrades the fusion protein in vivo and in vitro. The substrate binds specifically to ClpA in a reaction requiring ATP binding but not hydrolysis. Binding alone is not sufficient to destabilize the native structure of the GFP portion of the fusion protein. Upon ATP hydrolysis the GFP fusion protein is unfolded, and the unfolded intermediate can be sequestered by ClpA if a nonhydrolyzable analog is added to displace ATP. ATP is required for release. We found that although ClpA is unable to recognize native proteins lacking recognition signals, including GFP and rhodanese, it interacts with those same proteins when they are unfolded. Unfolded GFP is held in a nonnative conformation while associated with ClpA and its release requires ATP hydrolysis. Degradation of unfolded untagged proteins by ClpAP requires ATP even though the initial ATP-dependent unfolding reaction is bypassed. These results suggest that there are two ATP-requiring steps: an initial protein unfolding step followed by translocation of the unfolded protein to ClpP or in some cases release from the complex.

Unfolding and internalization of proteins by the ATP-dependent proteases ClpXP and ClpAP.

ClpX and ClpA are molecular chaperones that interact with specific proteins and, together with ClpP, activate their ATP-dependent degradation. The chaperone activity is thought to convert proteins into an extended conformation that can access the sequestered active sites of ClpP. We now show that ClpX can catalyze unfolding of a green fluorescent protein fused to a ClpX recognition motif (GFP-SsrA). Unfolding of GFP-SsrA depends on ATP hydrolysis. GFP-SsrA unfolded either by ClpX or by treatment with denaturants binds to ClpX in the presence of adenosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) and is released slowly (t(1/2) approximately 15 min). Unlike ClpA, ClpX cannot trap unfolded proteins in stable complexes unless they also have a high-affinity binding motif. Addition of ATP or ADP accelerates release (t(1/2) approximately 1 min), consistent with a model in which ATP hydrolysis induces a conformation of ClpX with low affinity for unfolded substrates. Proteolytically inactive complexes of ClpXP and ClpAP unfold GFP-SsrA and translocate the protein to ClpP, where it remains unfolded. Complexes of ClpXP with translocated substrate within the ClpP chamber retain the ability to unfold GFP-SsrA. Our results suggest a bipartite mode of interaction between ClpX and substrates. ClpX preferentially targets motifs exposed in specific proteins. As the protein is unfolded by ClpX, additional motifs are exposed that facilitate its retention and favor its translocation to ClpP for degradation.

ClpA and ClpP remain associated during multiple rounds of ATP-dependent protein degradation by ClpAP protease.

The Escherichia coli ClpA and ClpP proteins form a complex, ClpAP, that catalyzes ATP-dependent degradation of proteins. Formation of stable ClpA hexamers and stable ClpAP complexes requires binding of ATP or nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues to ClpA. To understand the order of events during substrate binding, unfolding, and degradation by ClpAP, it is essential to know the oligomeric state of the enzyme during multiple catalytic cycles. Using inactive forms of ClpA or ClpP as traps for dissociated species, we measured the rates of dissociation of ClpA hexamers or ClpAP complexes. When ATP was saturating, the rate constant for dissociation of ClpA hexamers was 0.032 min(-1) (t(1/2) of 22 min) at 37 degrees C, and dissociation of ClpP from the ClpAP complexes occurred with a rate constant of 0. 092 min(-1) (t(1/2) of 7.5 min). Because the k(cat) for casein degradation is approximately 10 min(-1), these results indicate that tens of molecules of casein can be turned over by the ClpAP complex before significant dissociation occurs. Mutations in the N-terminal ATP binding site led to faster rates of ClpA and ClpAP dissociation, whereas mutations in the C-terminal ATP binding site, which cause significant decreases in ATPase activity, led to lower rates of dissociation of ClpA and ClpAP complexes. Dissociation rates for wild-type and first domain mutants of ClpA were faster at low nucleotide concentrations. The t(1/2) for dissociation of ClpAP complexes in the presence of nonhydrolyzable analogues was >/=30 min. Thus, ATP binding stabilizes the oligomeric state of ClpA, and cycles of ATP hydrolysis affect the dynamics of oligomer interaction. However, since the k(cat) for ATP hydrolysis is approximately 140 min(-1), ClpA and the ClpAP complex remain associated during hundreds of rounds of ATP hydrolysis. Our results indicate that the ClpAP complex is the functional form of the protease and as such engages in multiple rounds of interaction with substrate proteins, degradation, and release of peptide products without dissociation.