Clock Cells Research Articles

Central and Peripheral Clock Control of Circadian Feeding Rhythms.

Many behaviors exhibit ~24-h oscillations under control of an endogenous circadian timing system that tracks time of day via a molecular circadian clock. In the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, most circadian research has focused on the generation of locomotor activity rhythms, but a fundamental question is how the circadian clock orchestrates multiple distinct behavioral outputs. Here, we have investigated the cells and circuits mediating circadian control of feeding behavior. Using an array of genetic tools, we show that, as is the case for locomotor activity rhythms, the presence of feeding rhythms requires molecular clock function in the ventrolateral clock neurons of the central brain. We further demonstrate that the speed of molecular clock oscillations in these neurons dictates the free-running period length of feeding rhythms. In contrast to the effects observed with central clock cell manipulations, we show that genetic abrogation of the molecular clock in the fat body, a peripheral metabolic tissue, is without effect on feeding behavior. Interestingly, we find that molecular clocks in the brain and fat body of control flies gradually grow out of phase with one another under free-running conditions, likely due to a long endogenous period of the fat body clock. Under these conditions, the period of feeding rhythms tracks with molecular oscillations in central brain clock cells, consistent with a primary role of the brain clock in dictating the timing of feeding behavior. Finally, despite a lack of effect of fat body selective manipulations, we find that flies with simultaneous disruption of molecular clocks in multiple peripheral tissues (but with intact central clocks) exhibit decreased feeding rhythm strength and reduced overall food intake. We conclude that both central and peripheral clocks contribute to the regulation of feeding rhythms, with a particularly dominant, pacemaker role for specific populations of central brain clock cells.

Effect of regular and irregular stimulation cycles of dexamethasone on circadian clock in NIH3T3 cells

ABSTRACT Animal studies have shown that irregular light-dark cycles cause circadian desynchronization, while few studies have addressed the effect of regular/irregular stimulation cycles of signaling hormones on the cellular clock in vitro. Here, we examined how cellular clocks respond to regular and irregular stimulation cycles of dexamethasone, using NIH3T3 cells transfected with the Bmal1 promoter-driven luciferase (Bmal1-Luc) reporter gene. Cyclic stimulation with dexamethasone at different time intervals (18–28 h, 3 times regularly) revealed that Bmal1-Luc bioluminescence rhythms can be entrained to 22 and 24 h cycles during the stimulation period, but not to other cycles. The rhythm entrained for 24 h cycles persisted for at least one day after the last stimulation. Irregular dexamethasone treatment (16, 24, and 16 h, sequentially; short-term jet lag protocol) resulted in an overall upregulation and phase shifts of the temporal expression of several clock genes and cell cycle genes, including c-Myc and p53. Regular dexamethasone stimulation three times with 24 h cycles also caused upregulation of Per1 and Per2 expression, but not c-Myc and p53 expression. In conclusion, our study identified the entrainable range of the circadian clock in NIH3T3 cells to the dexamethasone stimulation cycle and demonstrated that irregular dexamethasone treatment could disturb the expression of cell cycle genes.

Single‐cell transcriptomics of suprachiasmatic nuclei reveal a Prokineticin‐driven circadian network

Circadian rhythms in mammals are governed by the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), in which 20,000 clock cells are connected together into a powerful time‐keeping network. In the absence of network‐level cellular interactions, the SCN fails as a clock. The topology and specific roles of its distinct cell populations (nodes) that direct network functions are, however, not understood. To characterise its component cells and network structure, we conducted single‐cell sequencing of SCN organotypic slices and identified eleven distinct neuronal sub‐populations across circadian day and night. We defined neuropeptidergic signalling axes between these nodes, and built neuropeptide‐specific network topologies. This revealed their temporal plasticity, being up‐regulated in circadian day. Through intersectional genetics and real‐time imaging, we interrogated the contribution of the Prok2‐ProkR2 neuropeptidergic axis to network‐wide time‐keeping. We showed that Prok2‐ProkR2 signalling acts as a key regulator of SCN period and rhythmicity and contributes to defining the network‐level properties that underpin robust circadian co‐ordination. These results highlight the diverse and distinct contributions of neuropeptide‐modulated communication of temporal information across the SCN.

Dorsal clock neurons in Drosophila sculpt locomotor outputs but are dispensable for circadian activity rhythms

SummaryThe circadian system is comprised three components: a network of core clock cells in the brain that keeps time, input pathways that entrain clock cells to the environment, and output pathways that use this information to ensure appropriate timing of physiological and behavioral processes throughout the day. Core clock cells can be divided into molecularly distinct populations that likely make unique functional contributions. Here we clarify the role of the dorsal neuron 1 (DN1) population of clock neurons in the transmission of circadian information by the Drosophila core clock network. Using an intersectional genetic approach that allowed us to selectively and comprehensively target DN1 cells, we show that suppressing DN1 neuronal activity alters the magnitude of daily activity and sleep without affecting overt rhythmicity. This suggests that DN1 cells are dispensable for both the generation of circadian information and the propagation of this information across output circuits.

Timed daily exercise remodels circadian rhythms in mice

Regular exercise is important for physical and mental health. An underexplored and intriguing property of exercise is its actions on the body’s 24 h or circadian rhythms. Molecular clock cells in the brain’s suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) use electrical and chemical signals to orchestrate their activity and convey time of day information to the rest of the brain and body. To date, the long-lasting effects of regular physical exercise on SCN clock cell coordination and communication remain unresolved. Utilizing mouse models in which SCN intercellular neuropeptide signaling is impaired as well as those with intact SCN neurochemical signaling, we examined how daily scheduled voluntary exercise (SVE) influenced behavioral rhythms and SCN molecular and neuronal activities. We show that in mice with disrupted neuropeptide signaling, SVE promotes SCN clock cell synchrony and robust 24 h rhythms in behavior. Interestingly, in both intact and neuropeptide signaling deficient animals, SVE reduces SCN neural activity and alters GABAergic signaling. These findings illustrate the potential utility of regular exercise as a long-lasting and effective non-invasive intervention in the elderly or mentally ill where circadian rhythms can be blunted and poorly aligned to the external world.

Mapping PERIOD-immunoreactive cells with neurons relevant to photoperiodic response in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris.

Circadian clock genes are involved in photoperiodic responses in many insects; however, there is a lack of understanding in the neural pathways that process photoperiodic information involving circadian clock cells. PERIOD-immunohistochemistry was conducted in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris to localise clock cells and their anatomical relationship with other brain neurons necessary for the photoperiodic response. PERIOD-immunoreactive cells were found in the six brain regions. In the optic lobe, two cell groups called lateral neuron lateral (LNl) and lateral neuron medial (LNm), were labelled anterior medial to the medulla and lobula, respectively. In the protocerebrum of the central brain, dorsal neuron (Prd), posterior neuron (Prp), and antennal lobe posterior neuron (pAL) were found. In the deutocerebrum, antennal lobe local neurons (ALln) were detected. Double immunohistochemistry revealed that PERIOD and serotonin were not co-localised. Furthermore, pigment-dispersing factor-immunoreactive neurons and anterior lobula neurons essential for R. pedestris photoperiodic response were not PERIOD immunopositive. LNl cells were located in the vicinity of the pigment-dispersing factor immunoreactive cells at the anterior base of the medulla. LNm cells were located close to the somata of the anterior lobula neurons. Fibres from the anterior lobula neurons and pigment-dispersing factor-immunoreactive neurons had contacts at the anterior base of the medulla. It is suggested that LNl cells work as clock cells involved in the photoperiodic response and the region at the medulla anterior base serves as a hub to receive photic and clock information relevant to the photoperiodic clock in R. pedestris.

Slowpoke functions in circadian output cells to regulate rest:activity rhythms.

The circadian system produces ~24-hr oscillations in behavioral and physiological processes to ensure that they occur at optimal times of day and in the correct temporal order. At its core, the circadian system is composed of dedicated central clock neurons that keep time through a cell-autonomous molecular clock. To produce rhythmic behaviors, time-of-day information generated by clock neurons must be transmitted across output pathways to regulate the downstream neuronal populations that control the relevant behaviors. An understanding of the manner through which the circadian system enacts behavioral rhythms therefore requires the identification of the cells and molecules that make up the output pathways. To that end, we recently characterized the Drosophila pars intercerebralis (PI) as a major circadian output center that lies downstream of central clock neurons in a circuit controlling rest:activity rhythms. We have conducted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to identify potential circadian output genes expressed by PI cells, and used cell-specific RNA interference (RNAi) to knock down expression of ~40 of these candidate genes selectively within subsets of PI cells. We demonstrate that knockdown of the slowpoke (slo) potassium channel in PI cells reliably decreases circadian rest:activity rhythm strength. Interestingly, slo mutants have previously been shown to have aberrant rest:activity rhythms, in part due to a necessary function of slo within central clock cells. However, rescue of slo in all clock cells does not fully reestablish behavioral rhythms, indicating that expression in non-clock neurons is also necessary. Our results demonstrate that slo exerts its effects in multiple components of the circadian circuit, including PI output cells in addition to clock neurons, and we hypothesize that it does so by contributing to the generation of daily neuronal activity rhythms that allow for the propagation of circadian information throughout output circuits.

Drosophila clock cells use multiple mechanisms to transmit time-of-day signals in the brain

Regulation of circadian behavior and physiology by the Drosophila brain clock requires communication from central clock neurons to downstream output regions, but the mechanism by which clock cells regulate downstream targets is not known. We show here that the pars intercerebralis (PI), previously identified as a target of the morning cells in the clock network, also receives input from evening cells. We determined that morning and evening clock neurons have time-of-day-dependent connectivity to the PI, which is regulated by specific peptides as well as by fast neurotransmitters. Interestingly, PI cells that secrete the peptide DH44, and control rest:activity rhythms, are inhibited by clock inputs while insulin-producing cells (IPCs) are activated, indicating that the same clock cells can use different mechanisms to drive cycling in output neurons. Inputs of morning cells to IPCs are relevant for the circadian rhythm of feeding, reinforcing the role of the PI as a circadian relay that controls multiple behavioral outputs. Our findings provide mechanisms by which clock neurons signal to nonclock cells to drive rhythms of behavior.

Dysregulated circadian clock and aged stem cell: An inflammatory crosstalk?

Dysregulated circadian clock and aged stem cell: An inflammatory crosstalk?

Insights into Oncogenesis from Circadian Timing in Cancer Stem Cells.

Cancer and circadian rhythms are linked in several ways, through immunomodulatory, neuroendocrine, and metabolic pathways. The circadian timing system consists of interacting circadian clocks in organs throughout the body that contain cells endowed with self-sustaining molecular circadian oscillations. Circadian rhythms are spontaneously generated by specific transcription and translation feedback cycles. Cancer cells emerging from these rhythmic tissues are subjected to daily physiological rhythms imposed by the circadian system, and some transformed cells have their own intrinsic circadian clocks. The role of these circadian clock cells in cancer prevention and oncogenesis remains to be fully explored. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that new cancers are fostered by degradation of the circadian system's rhythmic properties. In contrast, circadian clocks within cancer cells might aid in their survival if they provide benefits such as an ability to synchronize with daily nutrient availability or circadian rhythms in immune cell activity. Here, we address new evidence challenging the simplicity of carcinogenesis models that depend solely on the importance of minimized cancer risk provided by well-aligned and robust circadian clocks in the body. The biology of cancer stem cells and the benefits they may receive from their own rhythmic and non-rhythmic expressions of core circadian clock genes are examined with a focus on gliomas and liver cancer stem cells, along with possibilities for timed medical interventions.

Circadian immune circuits.

Immune responses are gated to protect the host against specific antigens and microbes, a task that is achieved through antigen- and pattern-specific receptors. Less appreciated is that in order to optimize responses and to avoid collateral damage to the host, immune responses must be additionally gated in intensity and time. An evolutionary solution to this challenge is provided by the circadian clock, an ancient time-keeping mechanism that anticipates environmental changes and represents a fundamental property of immunity. Immune responses, however, are not exclusive to immune cells and demand the coordinated action of nonhematopoietic cells interspersed within the architecture of tissues. Here, we review the circadian features of innate immunity as they encompass effector immune cells as well as structural cells that orchestrate their responses in space and time. We finally propose models in which the central clock, structural elements, and immune cells establish multidirectional circadian circuits that may shape the efficacy and strength of immune responses and other physiological processes.

Crosstalk between vrille transcripts, proteins, and regulatory elements controlling circadian rhythms and development in Drosophila.

SummaryThe vrille (vri) gene encodes a transcriptional repressor required for Drosophila development as well as circadian behavior in adults. Alternate first exons produce vri transcripts predicted to produce a short VRI isoform during development and long VRI in adults. A vri mutant (vriΔ679) lacking long VRI transcripts is viable, confirming that short VRI is sufficient for developmental functions, yet behavioral rhythms in vriΔ679 flies persist, showing that short VRI is sufficient for clock output. E-box regulatory elements that drive rhythmic long VRI transcript expression are required for developmental expression of short VRI transcripts. Surprisingly, long VRI transcripts primarily produce short VRI in adults, apparently due to a poor Kozak sequence context, demonstrating that short VRI drives circadian behavior. Thus, E-box-driven long VRI transcripts primarily control circadian rhythms via short VRI, whereas the same E-boxes drive short VRI transcripts that control developmental functions using short VRI.

Abstract 17233: Clock Modulating Small Molecule SR9011 Enhances Cell Cycle Arrest in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rapidly progressing disease of the lung vasculature, characterized by the remodeling of small pulmonary arteries in which pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) exhibit a cancer-like phenotype, with uncontrolled replication, self-sustaining growth signals, evasion of growth suppressors and resistance to apoptosis. In healthy cells, cell division is controlled by the circadian clock resulting in timed mitosis and rhythmic DNA replication. This suggests that impaired circadian clock might be involved in the cell cycle disorders seen in PAH. Especially, impaired function of the nuclear receptor Rev-Erbα (a core clock protein) has been associated with circadian clock impairment and cell cycle disorders in cancer. Hypothesis: Rev-Erbα impairment is involved in PAH pathogenesis. Methods & Results: We synchronized (Zeitgeber method using 50% horse serum for 2 hours) human PASMCs isolated from 4 PAH patients and 4 controls, and demonstrated a reduced (p=0.0192) (immunoblot) expression of Rev-Erbα 12 hours post synchronization in PAH-PASMCs compared to controls, associated with increased proliferation (Ki67 assay) and resistance to apoptosis (annexin V assay) (p<0.05), which were reversed by the Rev-Erbα agonist SR9011 (10μM for 24h). RNAseq (n=4/group) demonstrated that most of the downregulated (2-fold cut-off) genes following SR9011 treatments were involved in cytokinesis, meiosis, mitotic processes, cell cycle progression, chromosome segregation and recombination (p<0.05). In vivo , Rev-Erbα was also significantly decreased in male and female monocrotaline rats. SR9011 treatments (n=15/group) for 2 weeks (50mg/kg, i.p.) improved PA hemodynamics ( RVSP:47.80mmHg vs 75.29mmHg \mPAP:26.69mmHg vs 44.36mmHg, p<0.0001); vascular remodeling, decreased proliferation(p=0.0001), increased apoptosis(p=0.0002)) and decreased RV hypertrophy (Fulton Index:0.3869 vs 0.5093 p=0.0006) compare to vehicle treated rats. These results were also repeated in the Fawn Hooded rats model. Conclusion: Our results suggest the involvement of Clock pathways in PAH etiology and thus open new avenue of investigation in PAH and new therapeutic options using clock-modulating small molecules.

Proteomic analysis of Drosophila CLOCK complexes identifies rhythmic interactions with SAGA and Tip60 complex component NIPPED-A

Circadian clocks keep time via ~ 24 h transcriptional feedback loops. In Drosophila, CLOCK-CYCLE (CLK-CYC) activators and PERIOD-TIMELESS (PER-TIM) repressors are feedback loop components whose transcriptional status varies over a circadian cycle. Although changes in the state of activators and repressors has been characterized, how their status is translated to transcriptional activity is not understood. We used mass spectrometry to identify proteins that interact with GFP-tagged CLK (GFP-CLK) in fly heads at different times of day. Many expected and novel interacting proteins were detected, of which several interacted rhythmically and were potential regulators of protein levels, activity or transcriptional output. Genes encoding these proteins were tested to determine if they altered circadian behavior via RNAi knockdown in clock cells. The NIPPED-A protein, a scaffold for the SAGA and Tip60 histone modifying complexes, interacts with GFP-CLK as transcription is activated, and reducing Nipped-A expression lengthens circadian period. RNAi analysis of other SAGA complex components shows that the SAGA histone deubiquitination (DUB) module lengthened period similarly to Nipped-A RNAi knockdown and weakened rhythmicity, whereas reducing Tip60 HAT expression drastically weakened rhythmicity. These results suggest that CLK-CYC binds NIPPED-A early in the day to promote transcription through SAGA DUB and Tip60 HAT activity.

Neitherper, nor tim1, nor cry2 alone are essential components of the molecular circadian clockwork in the Madeira cockroach.

Circadian clocks control rhythms in physiology and behavior entrained to 24 h light–dark cycles. Despite of conserved general schemes, molecular circadian clockworks differ between insect species. With RNA interference (RNAi) we examined an ancient circadian clockwork in a basic insect, the hemimetabolous Madeira cockroach Rhyparobia maderae. With injections of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) of cockroach period (Rm´per), timeless 1 (Rm´tim1), or cryptochrome 2 (Rm´cry2) we searched for essential components of the clock´s core negative feedback loop. Single injections of dsRNA of each clock gene into adult cockroaches successfully and permanently knocked down respective mRNA levels within ~two weeks deleting daytime-dependent mRNA rhythms for Rm´per and Rm´cry2. Rm´perRNAi or Rm´cry2RNAi affected total mRNA levels of both genes, while Rm´tim1 transcription was independent of both, also keeping rhythmic expression. Unexpectedly, circadian locomotor activity of most cockroaches remained rhythmic for each clock gene knockdown employed. It expressed weakened rhythms and unchanged periods for Rm´perRNAi and shorter periods for Rm´tim1RNAi and Rm´cry2RNAi.As a hypothesis of the cockroach´s molecular clockwork, a basic network of switched differential equations was developed to model the oscillatory behavior of clock cells expressing respective clock genes. Data were consistent with two synchronized main groups of coupled oscillator cells, a leading (morning) oscillator, or a lagging (evening) oscillator that couple via mutual inhibition. The morning oscillators express shorter, the evening oscillators longer endogenous periods based on core feedback loops with either PER, TIM1, or CRY2/PER complexes as dominant negative feedback of the clockwork. We hypothesize that dominant morning oscillator cells with shorter periods express PER, but not CRY2, or TIM1 as suppressor of clock gene expression, while two groups of evening oscillator cells with longer periods either comprise TIM1 or CRY2/PER suppressing complexes. Modelling suggests that there is an additional negative feedback next to Rm´PER in cockroach morning oscillator cells.

The optic lobe–pars intercerebralis axis is involved in circa’bi’dian rhythm of the large black chafer Holotrichia parallela

The large black chafer Holotrichia parallela exhibits ~ 48-h circa'bi'dian rhythm. Although circabidian rhythm is suggested to involve the circadian clock, no physiological studies have been conducted to verify this involvement. We examined the effects of optic lobe or pars intercerebralis removal on the circabidian rhythm. After removing both optic lobes, all beetles lost their circabidian rhythms (N = 25), but all beetles exhibited circabidian rhythm after removing unilateral optic lobe (N = 18). However, 22% of the latter group exhibited day switching. After removal of the pars intercerebralis, 26.3% beetles showed arrhythmic patterns (N = 19). The number of paraldehyde fuchsin-stained pars intercerebralis cells in the arrhythmic group was significantly reduced compared to in the intact and sham-operated groups. The activity in the pars intercerebralis-removed beetles was significantly higher than that in the control groups. The results show that the optic lobe and at least part of the pars intercerebralis are necessary for circabidian rhythm, and bilateral optic lobes are necessary to maintain regularity of the two-day rhythm in H. parallela. This suggests that a neural circuit of circadian clock cells in the optic lobe to pars lateralis might be evolutionally conserved and used also for the generation of circabidian rhythm.

A molecular circadian clock operates in the parathyroid gland and is disturbed in chronic kidney disease associated bone and mineral disorder

Circadian rhythms in metabolism, hormone secretion, cell cycle and locomotor activity are regulated by a molecular circadian clock with the master clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the central nervous system. However, an internal clock is also expressed in several peripheral tissues. Although about 10% of all genes are regulated by clock machinery an internal molecular circadian clock in the parathyroid glands has not previously been investigated. Parathyroid hormone secretion exhibits a diurnal variation and parathyroid hormone gene promoter contains an E-box like element, a known target of circadian clock proteins. Therefore, we examined whether an internal molecular circadian clock is operating in parathyroid glands, whether it is entrained by feeding and how it responds to chronic kidney disease. As uremia is associated with extreme parathyroid growth and since disturbed circadian rhythm is related to abnormal growth, we examined the expression of parathyroid clock and clock-regulated cell cycle genes in parathyroid glands of normal and uremic rats. Circadian clock genes were found to be rhythmically expressed in normal parathyroid glands and this clock was minimally entrained by feeding. Diurnal regulation of parathyroid glands was next examined. Significant rhythmicity of fibroblast-growth-factor-receptor-1, MafB and Gata3 was found. In uremic rats, deregulation of circadian clock genes and the cell cycle regulators, Cyclin D1, c-Myc, Wee1 and p27, which are influenced by the circadian clock, was found in parathyroid glands as well as the aorta. Thus, a circadian clock operates in parathyroid glands and this clock and downstream cell cycle regulators are disturbed in uremia and may contribute to dysregulated parathyroid proliferation in secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Norpa Signalling and the Seasonal Circadian Locomotor Phenotype in Drosophila.

In this paper, we review the role of the norpA-encoded phospholipase C in light and thermal entrainment of the circadian clock in Drosophila melanogaster. We extend our discussion to the role of norpA in the thermo-sensitive splicing of the per 3′ UTR, which has significant implications for seasonal adaptations of circadian behaviour. We use the norpA mutant-generated enhancement of per splicing and the corresponding advance that it produces in the morning (M) and evening (E) locomotor component to dissect out the neurons that are contributing to this norpA phenotype using GAL4/UAS. We initially confirmed, by immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation in adult brains, that norpA expression is mostly concentrated in the eyes, but we were unable to unequivocally reveal norpA expression in the canonical clock cells using these methods. In larval brains, we did see some evidence for co-expression of NORPA with PDF in clock neurons. Nevertheless, downregulation of norpA in clock neurons did generate behavioural advances in adults, with the eyes playing a significant role in the norpA seasonal phenotype at high temperatures, whereas the more dorsally located CRYPTOCHROME-positive clock neurons are the likely candidates for generating the norpA behavioural effects in the cold. We further show that knockdown of the related plc21C encoded phospholipase in clock neurons does not alter per splicing nor generate any of the behavioural advances seen with norpA. Our results with downregulating norpA and plc21C implicate the rhodopsins Rh2/Rh3/Rh4 in the eyes as mediating per 3′ UTR splicing at higher temperatures and indicate that the CRY-positive LNds, also known as ‘evening’ cells are likely mediating the low-temperature seasonal effects on behaviour via altering per 3′UTR splicing.

A Functional Clock Within the Main Morning and Evening Neurons of D. melanogaster Is Not Sufficient for Wild-Type Locomotor Activity Under Changing Day Length.

A major challenge for all organisms that live in temperate and subpolar regions is to adapt physiology and activity to different photoperiods. A long-standing model assumes that there are morning (M) and evening (E) oscillators with different photoreceptive properties that couple to dawn and dusk, respectively, and by this way adjust activity to the different photoperiods. In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, M and E oscillators have been localized to specific circadian clock neurons in the brain. Here, we investigate under different photoperiods the activity pattern of flies expressing the clock protein PERIOD (PER) only in subsets of M and E oscillators. We found that all fly lines that expressed PER only in subsets of the clock neurons had difficulties to track the morning and evening in a wild-type manner. The lack of the E oscillators advanced M activity under short days, whereas the lack of the M oscillators delayed E activity under the same conditions. In addition, we found that flies expressing PER only in subsets of clock neurons showed higher activity levels at certain times of day or night, suggesting that M and E clock neurons might inhibit activity at specific moments throughout the 24 h. Altogether, we show that the proper interaction between all clock cells is important for adapting the flies’ activity to different photoperiods and discuss our findings in the light of the current literature.

Kalanchoë PPC1 Is Essential for Crassulacean Acid Metabolism and the Regulation of Core Circadian Clock and Guard Cell Signaling Genes.

Unlike C3 plants, Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plants fix CO2 in the dark using phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PPC; EC 4.1.1.31). PPC combines phosphoenolpyruvate with CO2 (as HCO3 -), forming oxaloacetate. The oxaloacetate is converted to malate, leading to malic acid accumulation in the vacuole, which peaks at dawn. During the light period, malate decarboxylation concentrates CO2 around Rubisco for secondary fixation. CAM mutants lacking PPC have not been described. Here, we employed RNA interference to silence the CAM isogene PPC1 in Kalanchoë laxiflora Line rPPC1-B lacked PPC1 transcripts, PPC activity, dark period CO2 fixation, and nocturnal malate accumulation. Light period stomatal closure was also perturbed, and the plants displayed reduced but detectable dark period stomatal conductance and arrhythmia of the CAM CO2 fixation circadian rhythm under constant light and temperature free-running conditions. By contrast, the rhythm of delayed fluorescence was enhanced in plants lacking PPC1 Furthermore, a subset of gene transcripts within the central circadian oscillator was upregulated and oscillated robustly in this line. The regulation of guard cell genes involved in controlling stomatal movements was also perturbed in rPPC1-B These findings provide direct evidence that the regulatory patterns of key guard cell signaling genes are linked with the characteristic inverse pattern of stomatal opening and closing during CAM.